LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

STENSON v MCLAUGHLIN Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: SVM108506, CourtName: THE COURT HAS CONSOLIDATED WITH A CONSIDERATION OF THE CASE ON THE MERITS. PROCEDURAL, Plaintiff: STENSON, State: NH New Hampshire, UniqueCaseRef: LCD>SVM108506, Citizens, Hampshire, Stenson, Voters, Complaint, Advocacy, Amici, Disclosure, Candidates, Statute, Election, First Amendment, Provisions, Buckley, Supreme Court, Federal Election, Communications, Political Advertising, District Court, Memorandum, Constitutionality, Rsa, Interpretation, Advertisements, Advocacy Test, Corruption, Narrowing Construction , ContentID: 120250223

Case Documents
1 2000-11-07 AMICUS CURIAE BRIEF
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 124098
26 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 1 document , 26 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . AMICUS CURIAE BRIEF

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
PLAINTIFFS
CITIZENS
HAMPSHIRE
STENSON
LAW
VOTERS
COMPLAINT
ADVOCACY
AMICI
DISCLOSURE
CANDIDATES
STATUTE
ELECTION
FIRST AMENDMENT
PROVISIONS
BUCKLEY
SUPREME COURT
FEDERAL ELECTION
COMMUNICATIONS
POLITICAL ADVERTISING
DISTRICT COURT
MEMORANDUM
CONSTITUTIONALITY
RSA
INTERPRETATION
ADVERTISEMENTS
ADVOCACY TEST
CORRUPTION
NARROWING CONSTRUCTION
                        UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                          DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

____________________________________
ROGER STENSON, and CITIZENS FOR )
LIFE, INC.,                                   ))
                       Plaintiffs,            ))
       v.                                     )     Civil Action No. 00-514-JD
                                              )
PHILIP MCLAUGHLIN, in his official            )
capacity as the New Hampshire Attorney  )
General and JEANNE SHAHEEN, in her  )
official capacity as Governor of the state of )
New Hampshire,                                ))
                       Defendants.            )
____________________________________)

      MEMORANDUM OF LAW OF  AMICI CURIAE IN OPPOSITION TO
   PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND
                            PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

       Amici Curiae League of Women Voters of New Hampshire and New Hampshire

Public Interest Research Group submit this memorandum of law in opposition to

plaintiffs' Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction, which

the Court has "consolidated with a consideration of the case on the merits."  Procedural

Order, November 7, 2000.  To the extent that the Court Order transformed plaintiffs'

pleadings into a motion for summary judgment, Amici submit this memorandum of law to

oppose summary judgment in favor of plaintiffs.

                             STATEMENT OF THE CASE

       Plaintiffs filed a Verified Complaint on October 31, 2000, seeking temporary and

permanent injunctive relief in the form of a court order declaring three provisions of RSA

Chapter 664 unconstitutional.  Though plaintiffs' complaint alleges four causes of action,



they in effect make only two arguments: 1) that the definition of "political advertising"

set forth in RSA § 664:2, VI impermissibly regulates so-called "issue advocacy"; and 2)

SNIPPETS:
  • UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
  • DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
  • ROGER STENSON, and CITIZENS FOR)
  • MEMORANDUM OF LAW OF AMICI CURIAE IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR TEMPORARY
  • Amici Curiae League of Women Voters of New Hampshire and New Hampshire
  • Public Interest Research Group submit this memorandum of law in opposition to
  • permanent injunctive relief in the form of a court order declaring three provisions of RSA
  • Though plaintiffs' complaint alleges four causes of action,
  • Facts Concerning New Hampshire's Interests in the Disclosure and Identification Required by
  • candidates for office and holding them accountable once elected.
  • advertising help deter corruption and the appearance of corruption.
  • disclosure of the sponsors of political advertising will be essential to them as
  • See, e.g., Interest Groups Spending Up and The Ads Are More Aggressive, N.Y. Times, March 18, Attacks, N.Y. Times Oct. 26, 1998; Ruth Marcus & Charles R. Babcock, The System Cracks Under the
  • On November 3 and 4, 2000, Citizens paid for two advertisements to
  • THE COURT SHOULD CERTIFY QUESTIONS OF INTERPRETATION OR SEVERANCE OF NEW HAMSPHIRE STATUTES
  • THE FIRST AMENDMENT DOES NOT PROHIBIT APPLICATION OF RSA 664:2,
  • statute" that is "void for vagueness".
  • Buckley v. Valeo, 424 U.S. 1; but see Richey v. Tyson, -- F. Supp.
  • communications in the context of candidate campaigns.
  • person at any election."
  • the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1974 in response to a First Amendment challenge.
  • Court to adopt a narrowing construction that would distinguish between electoral
  • the Furgatch court properly emphasized that the express advocacy test requires
  • Defending the Constitutionality of the FEC's New Express Advocacy
  • doubt is amplified in the district court opinion adopted by the First Circuit in MRLC.
  •    |