LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

ROBERT JOSLYN v JOHN J ARMSTRONG Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: RJVJJA170139, Plaintiff: ROBERT JOSLYN, State: CT Connecticut, UniqueCaseRef: LCD>RJVJJA170139, Prisoners, Restraints, Wrsp, Joslyn, Connecticut, Defendant Armstrong, Pursuant, Virginia, Suffering, Confinement, Relief, Constitution, Subjecting, Punishment, Cdoc, Contract, Toilet, Robert Joslyn, Correction, Complaint, Declaratory Relief, Custody, Staff, Civil, Vdoc, Policy, Cell Door , ContentID: 120250196

Case Documents
1 2001-02-07 CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 124048
10 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 1 document , 10 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
RESTRAINTS
WRSP
JOSLYN
PLAINTIFFS
CONNECTICUT
DEFENDANT ARMSTRONG
PURSUANT
VIRGINIA
SUFFERING
CONFINEMENT
COURT
RELIEF
CONSTITUTION
SUBJECTING
PUNISHMENT
CDOC
CONTRACT
TOILET
ROBERT JOSLYN
CORRECTION
COMPLAINT
DECLARATORY RELIEF
CUSTODY
STAFF
LAW
CIVIL
VDOC
POLICY
CELL DOOR
                              UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                                 DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

                                           Civil Action No.
                                        Date: February 7, 2001

                          ROBERT JOSLYN , on behalf of himself and all
                                       others similarly situated,


                                              Plaintiffs,


                                                   v.


                           JOHN J. ARMSTRONG , Commissioner of the
                             Connecticut Department of Correction, in his
                                           official capacity,

                                              Defendant.


      CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE AND DECLARATORY RELIEF


                                  PRELIMINARY STATEMENT

1.        This is a class action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the Eighth and Fourteenth

      Amendments to the United States Constitution.  This action seeks injunctive and declaratory

relief on behalf of Connecticut state prisoners confined at Wallens Ridge State Prison (WRSP) in

Big Stone Gap, Virginia.  This action alleges that by housing prisoners in his custody at WRSP,

defendant John J. Armstrong is knowingly subjecting them to conditions that constitute cruel and

unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution of

                                          the United States.

                                          JURISDICTION



                                                   1


SNIPPETS:
  • Connecticut Department of Correction, in his
  • CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE AND DECLARATORY RELIEF
  • Amendments to the United States Constitution.
  • Big Stone Gap, Virginia.
  • This action alleges that by housing prisoners in his custody at WRSP,
  • This Court has subject matter jurisdiction of this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331
  • omissions giving rise to plaintiffs' claims occurred in this district.
  • Plaintiff Robert Joslyn is a prisoner committed to the custody of the Connecticut
  • Department of Correction (CDOC) pursuant to a judgment of a Connecticut state court.
  • he has acted under color of state law.
  • On or about October 12, 1999, defendant Armstrong, on behalf of the CDOC, signed a
  • contract with the VDOC providing for the confinement of Connecticut prisoners at WRSP.
  • but to inflict summary punishment on prisoners who have somehow
  • Prisoners in five-point restraints are bound to a steel bed by restraints at
  • and sticking a rolled-up piece of paper out the cell door.
  • Prisoners in restraints are not adequately monitored by medical staff.
  • Often prisoners in restraints are not allowed timely access to toilet facilities,
  • The use of five-point restraints on prisoners at WRSP is sanctioned by official policy.
  • The complete immobilization caused by the restraints resulted in Mr. Joslyn suffering
  • subjecting prisoners in his custody to the unconstitutional use of five-point restraints
  • experienced in class action, civil rights, and prison conditions litigation.
  •    |