LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

PILCHUCK AUDOBON SOCIETY v NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: PASVNMFS309950, Plaintiff: PILCHUCK AUDOBON SOCIETY, State: WA Washington, UniqueCaseRef: LCD>PASVNMFS309950, Critical Habitat, Chinook Salmon, Street Project, Puget Sound, Species, Threatened Puget Sound, Biological Opinion, Designated Critical Habitat, Jeopardize, Washington, Everett, Snohomish River, Endangered Species Act, Adverse Modification, Nmfs, Simpson Site, Pilchuck Audubon Society, Continued Existence, Consultation, Landfill Site, Lowell River Road, Esa, Audubon Society, Destruction, Listed Species, Western District, Fisheries Service, Unduly Narrow , ContentID: 120250185

Case Documents
1   COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 124034
18 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 1 document , 18 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . COMPLAINT

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
CHINOOK SALMON
STREET PROJECT
PUGET SOUND
SPECIES
THREATENED PUGET SOUND
BIOLOGICAL OPINION
DESIGNATED CRITICAL HABITAT
JEOPARDIZE
WASHINGTON
EVERETT
SNOHOMISH RIVER
ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT
ADVERSE MODIFICATION
NMFS
SIMPSON SITE
PLAINTIFFS
PILCHUCK AUDUBON SOCIETY
CONTINUED EXISTENCE
CONSULTATION
LANDFILL SITE
LOWELL RIVER ROAD
ESA
AUDUBON SOCIETY
DESTRUCTION
LISTED SPECIES
ATTORNEYS
WESTERN DISTRICT
FISHERIES SERVICE
UNDULY NARROW

 1 KRISTEN L. BOYLES (WSB #23806)
      PATTI A. GOLDMAN (WSB #24426)
 2 Earthjustice Legal Defense Fund
      705 Second Ave., Suite 203
 3 Seattle, WA  98104
      (206) 343-7340
 4 (206) 343-1526 [FAX]
      kboyles@earthjustice.org
 5 pgoldman@earthjustice.org

 6 Attorneys for Plaintiffs

 7                                 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                          FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
 8  PILCHUCK AUDUBON SOCIETY; and  )  Civ. No.
 9 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES FOR                              )
      ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSIBILITY,                  )  COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY
10                                                   )  JUDGMENT AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
        Plaintiffs,                                  )
11                                                   )
       v.                                            )
12                                                   )
      NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES                      )
13 SERVICE,                                          )
        Defendant.                                   )
14

15                                           INTRODUCTION

16           1. This action challenges a biological opinion issued by the National Marine

17 Fisheries Service under Section 7(a)(2) of the Endangered Species Act, 16 U.S.C. § 1536(a)(2),

18 for the 41st  Street Overcrossing Freight Mobility Project ("the 41st  Street Project") ­ a

19 proposed highway project in Everett, Washington.  The biological opinion concludes that the

20 41st Street Project will not jeopardize the continued existence of threatened Puget Sound

21 chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) or result in destruction or adverse modification of

22 the salmon's designated critical habitat.  This action challenges the biological opinion because

23 the scope of the biological opinion is unduly narrow; it misses key impacts on threatened Puget

24 Sound salmon; it runs counter to the evidence before the agency and prior determinations made
                                                                  Earthjustice Legal Defense Fund
SNIPPETS:
  • Attorneys for Plaintiffs
  • FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
  • PILCHUCK AUDUBON SOCIETY; and) Civ.
  • 19 proposed highway project in Everett,
  • 20 41st Street Project will not jeopardize the continued existence of threatened Puget Sound
  • 21 chinook salmon or result in destruction or adverse modification of
  • This action challenges the biological opinion because
  • by the agency; it fails to independently assess the project's impact on designated critical
  • result in adverse modification of the species' designated critical habitat within the meaning
  • Endangered Species Act.
  • also seeks an injunction directing National Marine Fisheries Service to withdraw the
  • 22 NMFS to comply with the law.
  • United States Department of Commerce responsible for administering the provisions of the ESA
  • The Snohomish River Watershed
  • The Landfill Site is a triangular area of approximately 70 acres owned by
  • Everett purchased the Simpson Site in the early-1990s with the intent to turn the
  • 18 will connect with the Lowell River Road and result in approximately 8 acres of impervious
  • Endangered Species Act Consultation
  • adverse modification of habitat" of a listed species.
  • ESA § 7requires NMFS to review projects to determine if they are likely to 14 jeopardize the
  • APA, 5 U.S.C. § 706, because the scope of the biological opinion is unduly narrow;
  • 15 C. Award plaintiffs their costs and attorneys' fees in this action pursuant to the Equal
  •    |