LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

PEG BALL v PHYLLIS BIEDESS Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: PBVPB128711, Plaintiff: PEG BALL, State: AZ Arizona, UniqueCaseRef: LCD>PBVPB128711, Care, Hcbs, Health, Ahcccs, Arizona, Attendant Care, Intervener-plaintiff, Disabilities, Altcs, Community, Care Plan, Pima Health System, Workers, Assistance, Wheelchair, Recipient, Institutionalization, Nursing Home, Medical Assistance, Beneficiaries, Receiving, Authorizes, State Agency, Native American Protection, Phyllis Biedess, Action Lawsuit, Health Care Cost, Containment System , ContentID: 120250180

Case Documents
1   AMENDED COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 124024
19 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 1 document , 19 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . AMENDED COMPLAINT

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
HCBS
HEALTH
AHCCCS
ARIZONA
ATTENDANT CARE
DEFENDANTS
INTERVENER-PLAINTIFF
DISABILITIES
LAW
ALTCS
COMMUNITY
CARE PLAN
PIMA HEALTH SYSTEM
WORKERS
ASSISTANCE
WHEELCHAIR
RECIPIENT
INSTITUTIONALIZATION
NURSING HOME
MEDICAL ASSISTANCE
BENEFICIARIES
RECEIVING
AUTHORIZES
STATE AGENCY
NATIVE AMERICAN PROTECTION
PHYLLIS BIEDESS
ACTION LAWSUIT
HEALTH CARE COST
CONTAINMENT SYSTEM
      1  SALLY HART  AZ Bar. No. 13453
      2 STEPHEN PALEVITZ AZ Bar No. 013356
           ARIZONA CENTER FOR DISABILITY LAW
      3 3131 N. Country Club, Suite. 100
           Tucson, AZ 85716
      4 (520) 327-9547

      5 ANNE RONAN  AZ Bar No. 006041
           TAMI JOHNSON AZ Bar No. 017296
      6 ARIZONA CENTER FOR DISABILITY LAW
           3839 N. Third St., Ste. 209
      7 Phoenix, AZ 85012
           (602) 274-6287
      8  THERESE YANAN
      9 DNA PEOPLES LEGAL SERVICES
           NATIVE AMERICAN PROTECTION & ADVOCACY PROJECT
     10 P.O. Box 3539
           Tuba City, AZ 86045
     11 (520) 283-3208

     12 BRUCE B. VIGNERY
           SARAH LENZ LOCK
     13 AARP LITIGATION
           601 E. Street, NW
     14 Washington, DC 20049

     15 Attorneys for Plaintiffs

     16                                       UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

     17                                              DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
     18  PEG BALL, CREE JAMES, a minor person by                    )
     19 and through her grandfather and guardian BENNIE             )
            JAMES, and JEANNE SPINKA, as individuals                )     No. CIV 00 - 67 TUC ACM
     20 and as representatives of a class of persons                )
           similarly situated,                                      )     INTERVENERS=
     21                              Plaintiffs,                    )     AMENDED COMPLAINT
                                                                    )
     22 VENNETTA GRAHAM, COLLIN PHELAN, a                           )
           minor person by and through his mother KIM               )
     23 BOWMAN, GRACE COLLIER, JUDETH                               )     CLASS ACTION
           HINTON, and VIRGINIA HASKELL, as                         )
     24 individuals and as representatives of a class of            )
           persons similarly situated,                              )
     25                              Intervener-plaintiffs          )
           v.                                                       )
     26                                                             )
           PHYLLIS BIEDESS, Director of the Arizona Health  )
     27 Care Cost Containment System, THE ARIZONA                   )
SNIPPETS:
  • ARIZONA CENTER FOR DISABILITY LAW
  • DNA PEOPLES LEGAL SERVICES NATIVE AMERICAN PROTECTION & ADVOCACY PROJECT
  • PHYLLIS BIEDESS, Director of the Arizona Health)
  • action lawsuit against the Director of the Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System,
  • The suit seeks to compel the defendants to provide adequate
  • home care services to recipients of Home and Community Based Services under the Arizona Long
  • Term Care System [ALTCS].
  • 11 HCBS because they have been found to be at risk of institutionalization.
  • 14 attendant care, personal care, housekeeper, and respite care services, but in this lawsuit
  • 18 shortfall in home care services is not corrected, intervener-plaintiffs and other HCBS
  • 21 give them written denial notices when they fail to provide workers to implement their care
  • ALTCS and are receiving HCBS services from defendant AHCCCS based on their limited financial
  • 18 Containment System, known as AHCCCS.
  • It authorizes the establishment by states of medical assistance programs for low
  • 25 individuals have been determined eligible, the state agency must continue to furnish
  • 26 the recipient is found to be ineligible.
  • When she complained to Pima Health System, her case worker appeared to be
  • right to appeal when they failed to provide attendant care workers to carry out her care plan.
  • 20 DES Division of Developmental Disabilities.
  • Intervener-Plaintiff Grace Collier
  • 11 toilet, change her diaper, dress, and transfer from wheelchair to bed.
  • Pillow then said that her only option was to enter a nursing home until Pima Health
  •    |