LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

CALIFORNIA v DYNEGY POWER MARKETING INC Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: CVDPMI200561, CourtCode: SU, CourtName: SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Plaintiff: CALIFORNIA, State: CA California, UniqueCaseRef: LCD>CVDPMI200561, Energy, Electricity, Market, Iso, California, Wholesale, Prices, Power, Competition, Trades Electricity, Practices, Acts, Sells, Demand, Purchase, Manipulation, Scheduling Coordinator, Unfair Business, Unlawful, Certified Scheduling Coordinator, San Francisco, Professions Code, Sempra Energy, County, Consumers, Alleges, Transmission Grid , ContentID: 120249976

Case Documents
1   COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 123717
14 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 1 document , 14 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . COMPLAINT

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
ELECTRICITY
MARKET
ISO
DEFENDANTS
CALIFORNIA
WHOLESALE
PRICES
POWER
BUSINESS
COMPETITION
TRADES ELECTRICITY
PRACTICES
ACTS
SELLS
DEMAND
PURCHASE
MANIPULATION
SCHEDULING COORDINATOR
UNFAIR BUSINESS
UNLAWFUL
CERTIFIED SCHEDULING COORDINATOR
SAN FRANCISCO
COURT
PROFESSIONS CODE
SEMPRA ENERGY
COUNTY
CONSUMERS
ALLEGES
TRANSMISSION GRID
 1 LOUISE H. RENNE (36508)
      San Francisco City Attorney
 2 OWEN J. CLEMENTS (141805)
      Chief of Special Litigation
 3 D. CAMERON BAKER (154432)
      THERESA L. MUELLER (172681)
 4 Deputy City Attorneys
      1390 Market Street, 6th Floor
 5 San Francisco, CA  94102-5408
      Telephone  415/554-3800
 6 MILBERG WEISS BERSHAD
 7   HYNES & LERACH LLP
      LEONARD B. SIMON (58310)
 8 PATRICK J. COUGHLIN (111070)
      FRANK J. JANECEK, JR. (156306)
 9 EX KANO S. SAMS II (192936)
      100 Pine Street, Suite 2600
10 San Francisco, CA  94111
      Telephone:  415/288-4545
11 Attorneys for Plaintiff
12                            SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
13                                      COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
14 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF                              ) Case No.
      CALIFORNIA, by and through San Francisco             )
15 City Attorney Louise H. Renne,                          ) COMPLAINT FOR UNFAIR, UNLAWFUL
                                                           ) AND DECEPTIVE TRADE PRACTICES IN
16                                     Plaintiff,          ) VIOLATION OF BUSINESS AND
                                                           ) PROFESSIONS CODE §§17200, et seq.
17            vs.                                          ))
18 DYNEGY POWER MARKETING, INC.,                           )
      ENRON ENERGY SERVICES, INC., ENRON                   )
19 POWER MARKETING, INC., PG&E ENERGY ) (07) Business tort/Unfair business
      TRADING HOLDING CORPORATION,                         )       practice
20 RELIANT ENERGY SERVICES, INC.,                          )
      SEMPRA ENERGY TRADING                                )
21 CORPORATION, SEMPRA ENERGY                              )
      RESOURCES, SOUTHERN COMPANY                          )
22 ENERGY MARKETING L.P., WILLIAMS                         )
      ENERGY MARKETING AND TRADING                         )
23 COMPANY, DUKE ENERGY TRADING AND )
      MARKETING, LLC, NRG ENERGY, INC.,                    )
24 MORGAN STANLEY CAPITAL GROUP,                           )
      INC., AND DOES 1 THROUGH 200,                        )
25 INCLUSIVE.                                              ))
26                                     Defendants.         ))
27

                                                      COMPLAINT

SNIPPETS:
  • San Francisco, CA 94102-5408 Telephone 415/554-3800
  • 19 POWER MARKETING, INC., PG&E ENERGY) Business tort/Unfair business
  • This Court also has jurisdiction in that plaintiff's claims are brought under California's
  • Competition Act
  • contacts within California, is a citizen of California, or otherwise intentionally avails
  • market either through the distribution, sale or trade of energy in the State of California or
  • 12 Court is a court of competent jurisdiction, defendants conduct substantial business in
  • The acts upon which this action is based occurred in part
  • 18 injuries that were sustained and are being sustained as a result of defendants' unlawful
  • 20 wholesale energy.
  • 21 injuries suffered and being suffered by retail and wholesale consumers due to defendants'
  • 22 wholesale energy prices.
  • plaintiff alleges that defendants unlawfully manipulated the
  • 24 Power Exchange and the California Independent System Operator.
  • pricing and demand, and combining to raise the "market clearing bid" for electric energy on
  • As a result of defendants' conduct, retail and wholesale consumers have paid
  • 18 unfair business practices have defeated the goals of A.B. 1890.
  • As a result of the defendants' anti19 competitive scheme, the rates for wholesale electricity
  • in Houston, Texas, directly or indirectly generates and sells electricity in the PX and ISO
  • Marketing is a certified scheduling coordinator on the ISO.
  • in Houston, Texas, that sells and trades electricity in the PX and ISO markets.
  • 22 Energy Trading is a subsidiary of Sempra Energy.
  • 21 purchasers of electricity submit bids for the price and quantity of energy they are
  • the SCs call into the ISO the route on the transmission grid
  • Professions Code §17200's proscription against engaging in unlawful business acts and
  •    |