LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

CALIFORNIA INDEPENDENT SYSTEM OPERATOR CORP v WILLIAMS ENERGY MARKETING and TRADING CO Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: 13, Plaintiff: CALIFORNIA INDEPENDENT SYSTEM OPERATOR CORP, State: CA California, UniqueCaseRef: LCD>13, Tariff, Is0, California, Injunction, Credits, Aes, Complaint, Control, Parte, Detmers, Regulatory, Agreement, Bond, Tro, Mpa, Obligations, Emergency, Threat, Blackouts, Power, Capacity, Exh, Cir, Complying, Participating Generator, Dynegy, Safety, Aqmd , ContentID: 120249971

Case Documents
1   EX PARTE APPLICATION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 123710
10 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 1 document , 10 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . EX PARTE APPLICATION

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
DEFENDANTS
IS0
CALIFORNIA
INJUNCTION
CREDITS
AES
COMPLAINT
CONTROL
PARTE
DETMERS
REGULATORY
AGREEMENT
BOND
TRO
MPA
COURT
OBLIGATIONS
EMERGENCY
THREAT
BLACKOUTS
POWER
CAPACITY
EXH
CIR
COMPLYING
PARTICIPATING GENERATOR
DYNEGY
SAFETY
AQMD
                                                                                                   

.





        1  Norma G. Formanek (CA Bar No. 111474)
              Laura C. Roche (CA Bar No. 174596)
       2      FARELLA  BRAUN  &  MARTEL  LtiP
              Russ Building, 30th Floor                                              QRIGINAL
       3      235 Montgomery Street
              San Francisco, CA  94104
       4      Telephone: (415) 954-4400
              Facsimile: (415) 954-4480
       5
              Edward Berlin                                                     CLERK,
                                                                                        U.S.
                                                                                                   
       6                                                                      EASmw  DISTRICT OF
             John R. Ferguson                                                 BY
              Timothy A. Ngau                                                            DEPM'YCLERK
       7      SWIDLER BERLIN  SHEREFF FRIEDMAN,  LLP
              3000 K  Street, N.W.
       8     Washington, DC 20007
             Telephone: (202) 424-7500
       9     Facsimile:  (202) 424-7643

      10  Attorneys for Plaintiff
             CALIFORNIA  INDEPENDENT SYSTEM
      11  OPERATOR CORPORATION

      12                                                  UNITED  STATES DISTRICT  COURT
      13                                        FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
      14
                                                                   SACRAMENTO DIVISION
      15

      16  CALIFORNIA  INDEPENDENT SYSTEM                                              Civil  No. 
      17  OPERATOR CORPORATION,                                                       EX PARTE
      18                                  Plaintiff,                                  TEMPORARY
                                                                                      AND ORDER TO
      19                 vs.                                                          PRELIMINARY
                                                                                      MEMORANDUM OF
      20     WILLIAMS  ENERGY MARKETING  &                                            AUTHORITIES
             TRADING  COMPANY;  AES PACERITA INC;                                     THEREOF
      21     AES ALAMITOS,  LLC;  AES HUNTINGTON
             BEACH, LLC;  AES REDONDO BEACH, LLC;                                     Date:        
SNIPPETS:
  • EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR TRO; MPA IN SUPPORT THEREOF
  • Defendants to comply with their obligations under the Tariff of the California ISO.
  • Verified Complaint in the action, the Declarations of James W. Detmers, Tracy Bibb and Norma
  • time and date for hearing a motion for preliminary injunction as required by L.R. 65-23 1.
  • 15 and approved by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.* The Tariff states:
  • The IS0 shall, subject to Section 5.6.2,
  • or threatened System Emergency or to retain Operational Control
  • 10 widespread blackouts of longer duration.
  • 11 aggregate, have approximately 4,083 megawatts of power generation capacity in California.
  • 12 Dynegy has roughly 2,000 megawatts of capacity.
  • 13 middle man between IS0 and AES, purchasing AES' energy output and reselling it to ISO.
  • 14 Verified Complaint, ¶I 10 - 14 and Exh.
  • The reason given was the Dynegy was running out of NOx emission credits.
  • Agreement wit the AQMD.
  • settlement agreement with AQMD HAS NOT CREATED any such circumstances.
  • SHOULD BE ISSUED TO MAINTAIN THE SAFETY AND RELIABILITY OF
  • 21 Barahona-Gomez v. Reno, 167 F.3d 1228, 1234 (Sti Cir.
  • 11 Participating Generator Agreements with the California IS0 in which they expressly agree
  • 22 Supreme Court has held that "rights as defined by the tariff cannot be varied or enlarged
  • (threat to public safety constituted irreparable harm requiring vacation of order staying
  • NO BOND SHOULD BE REOUIRED.
  • order and/or preliminary injunction requiring the Defendants to continue complying with the
  •    |