LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

BARBARA CHASE-RIBOUD v DREAMWORKS INC Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: BCRVDI183612, Plaintiff: BARBARA CHASE-RIBOUD, State: CA California, UniqueCaseRef: LCD>BCRVDI183612, Dreamworks, Chase-riboud, Shaeffer, Llp, Punch, Lions, Echo, Penguin, Copyright Infringement, Amistad, Distribution, California, Act, John, Film, Llc, Production, Basis Alleges, Barbara Chase-riboud, Unfair Competition, First Amended Complaint, Theatrical Motion Picture, State Bar, Penguin Putnam, Compensation, John Quincy Adams, Screenplay, United States, Spielberg, Lanham Act , ContentID: 120249960

Case Documents
1   COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 123680
21 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 1 document , 21 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . COMPLAINT

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
CHASE-RIBOUD
SHAEFFER
LLP
PUNCH
LIONS
ECHO
PENGUIN
COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT
AMISTAD
DISTRIBUTION
CALIFORNIA
ACT
JOHN
FILM
LLC
PRODUCTION
BASIS ALLEGES
BARBARA CHASE-RIBOUD
UNFAIR COMPETITION
FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
THEATRICAL MOTION PICTURE
STATE BAR
PENGUIN PUTNAM
COMPENSATION
JOHN QUINCY ADAMS
SCREENPLAY
UNITED STATES
SPIELBERG
LANHAM ACT
  1    O'DONNELL & SHAEFFER, LLP
  2    PIERCE O'DONNELL (State Bar No. 081298)
       JOHN SHAEFFER (State Bar No. 139331)
  3    LEE R. SELTMAN (State Bar No. 168857)
       ERIC S. VANDERPOOL (State Bar No. 187307)
  4    633 West Fifth Street, Suite 1700
  5    Los Angeles, California  90071
       (213) 532-2000
  6
  7    Attorneys for Plaintiff
       BARBARA CHASE-RIBOUD
  8
  9                                                   UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
 10                                                CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
 11                                                                WESTERN DIVISION
 12      BARBARA CHASE-RIBOUD, an Individual, ) CASE NO.  97-7619 ABC (JGx)
 13                                                                                    )
                                            Plaintiff,                                 )
 14                 v.                                                                 )) FIRST
 15      DREAMWORKS, Inc. (dba DREAMWORKS )) (1) COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT (17
 16      SKG) a Delaware Corporation;                                                        U.S.C.
         DREAMWORKS FILMS LLC, a California                                            ) (2)
 17      limited liability company; DREAMWORKS                                         )    
         DISTRIBUTION LLC, a California limited                                        ) (3)
 18      liability company; DREAMWORKS LLC, a                                          )    
         California limited liability company; PUNCH                                   ) (4) UNFAIR
 19      PRODUCTIONS INC., a Connecticut                                               )     §§
         Corporation; PENGUIN PUTNAM, INC., a                                          ) (5)
 20      Delaware Corporation; PENGUIN BOOKS                                           )     U.S.C.
         USA INC., a New York Corporation; and                                         ) (6)
 21      DOES 4 through 50, inclusive,                                                 )) JURY
 22                                         Defendants.                                ))
 23                                                                                     )
 24
 25              Plaintiff Barbara Chase-Riboud, by her undersigned attorneys, complains against
 26    DreamWorks, Inc., DreamWorks Films LLC, DreamWorks Distribution LLC, and DreamWorks
 27    LLC (collectively "DreamWorks"), Punch Productions Inc. ("Punch"), and Penguin Putnam, Inc.
 28    and Penguin Books USA Inc. (collectively "Penguin") as follows:


O'DONNELL & SHAEFFER, LLP



      1
      2                                        JURISDICTION AND VENUE
      3             1.   This First Amended Complaint alleges copyright infringement and
      4    copyright infringement arising under the Copyright Act of 1976, 17 U.S.C. §§ 101 et seq.
      5    claim for unfair competition arising under the Lanham Act of 1946 (as amended), 15 U.S.C.
SNIPPETS:
  • O'DONNELL & SHAEFFER, LLP
  • PIERCE O'DONNELL (State Bar No. 081298)
  • 12 BARBARA CHASE-RIBOUD, an Individual,) CASE NO. 97-7619 ABC
  • 15 DREAMWORKS, Inc. ) COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT (17
  • 26 DreamWorks, Inc., DreamWorks Films LLC, DreamWorks Distribution LLC, and DreamWorks
  • 27 LLC, Punch Productions Inc., and Penguin Putnam, Inc. 28 and Penguin Books USA Inc. as
  • O'DONNELL & SHAEFFER, LLP
  • copyright infringement arising under the Copyright Act of 1976, 17 U.S.C. §§ 101 et seq.
  • California law and includes a claim for declaratory relief.
  • 13 copyright infringement, contributory copyright infringement, unfair competition and other
  • 17 district and its infringing theatrical motion picture will be exhibited within this
  • 20 genocidal crime ­ our Black Holocaust ­ continue to haunt the United States of America.
  • 25 Tubman, Abraham Lincoln, and John Quincy Adams ­ are well-known;
  • 15 President and then Congressman John Quincy Adams, Cinque and his fellow Africans ultimately
  • 28 Cinque and the Amistad saga, weaving fictional characters and scenes into an absorbing
  • makes Echo of Lions a compelling epic, a work of such breathtaking originality that any
  • submitted it to Steven Spielberg in 1988.
  • 17 for a feature film and better suited for a mini-series.
  • In February 1993, Punch optioned the motion picture, television and ancillary rights to Echo
  • believes, and on that basis alleges, that less than two months after the option lapsed,
  • 10 of the screenplay, published by Defendant Penguin, has very recently arrived at bookstores.
  • 16 of the recognition and just compensation she deserves for her crucial contribution to
  • Inc. is engaged in the production and worldwide distribution of theatrical motion
  • 18 pertinent to this First Amended Complaint, DreamWorks, Inc. has controlled, succeeded to,
  • 21 that basis alleges, that Penguin Putnam, Inc. conducts substantial, continuous and
  • 27 the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. Sections 1117 and 1125.
  •    |