LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

ALAMEDA GATEWAY LTD v UNITED STATES Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: AGLVUS176490, CourtCode: FED, CourtName: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS, Plaintiff: ALAMEDA GATEWAY LTD, State: HI Hawaii, UniqueCaseRef: LCD>AGLVUS176490, Navigational Servitude, Facts, Kupchak Hastert, Damon Key Leong, Corps, Fast Land, District Court, Exhibit, United States, Private, Piers, Navigable Waters, History, Agl, Compensation, Federal Government, Kaiser Aetna, Undisputed Fact, Regulatory Jurisdiction, Navigational Servitude Defense, Regulation, California, Summary Judgment, Counterstatement, Authority, Carolina Coastal Council, Law Corporation , ContentID: 120249945

Case Documents
1   PLAINTIFFS MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO DEF MOT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 123630
24 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 1 document , 24 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . PLAINTIFFS MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO DEF MOT

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
COURT
FACTS
KUPCHAK HASTERT
DAMON KEY LEONG
LAW
CORPS
FAST LAND
DISTRICT COURT
EXHIBIT
UNITED STATES
PRIVATE
PIERS
NAVIGABLE WATERS
HISTORY
AGL
COMPENSATION
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT
KAISER AETNA
UNDISPUTED FACT
REGULATORY JURISDICTION
NAVIGATIONAL SERVITUDE DEFENSE
REGULATION
CALIFORNIA
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ATTORNEYS
COUNTERSTATEMENT
AUTHORITY
CAROLINA COASTAL COUNCIL
LAW CORPORATION
                         1 DIANE D. HASTERT
                             Attorney of Record
                         2 R. CHARLES BOCKEN
                         3 ROBERT H. THOMAS
                             Of Counsel:
                         4 DAMON KEY LEONG KUPCHAK HASTERT
                             Attorneys at Law
                         5 A Law Corporation
                             1001 Bishop Street
                         6 1600 Pauahi Tower
                             Honolulu, Hawaii 96813
                         7 http://www.hawaiilawyer.com
                             Telephone: (808) 531-8031
                         8 Facsimile:   (808) 533-2242
                         9 Attorneys for Plaintiff
                               ALAMEDA GATEWAY, LTD.
                    10
                    11                              IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
                    12 ALAMEDA GATEWAY, LTD.,                          )    Case No. 97-160 L
                    13                                                 )
                                      Plaintiff,                       )    Judge Emily C. Hewitt
                    14                                                 )
                                      vs.                              )    PLAINTIFF'S MEMORANDUM
                    15                                                 )    OPPOSITION TO
                             UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                 )    FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT;
                    16                                                 )    DECLARATION OF JOHN C.
                                      Defendant,                       )    DECLARATION OF ROBERT
                    17                                                 )    EXHIBITS 39 - 42;
                               and                                     )    SERVICE
                    18                                                 )
                             PORT OF OAKLAND,                          )
                    19                                                 )
                                      Defendant/Intervenor.            )
                    20 ____________________________________)
                    21
                    22
                    23
                    24
                    25
                    26
                    27
                    28

DAMON KEY LEONG
  KUPCHAK HASTERT
    A LAW CORPORATION



SNIPPETS:
  • A Law Corporation
  • Attorneys for Plaintiff
  • DAMON KEY LEONG KUPCHAK HASTERT A LAW CORPORATION
  • COUNTERSTATEMENT OF THE ISSUES
  • Navigational Servitude Issue, And Its "Undisputed Facts" Are Not Material
  • The District Court Decisions
  • Dry, Fast Land
  • Prevent It From Using The Navigational Servitude Defense
  • Exhibit and Tab Description
  • Rules of the Court of Federal Claims,
  • 15 Armstrong v. United States,
  • South Carolina Coastal Council,
  • Nollan v. California Coastal Comm'n,
  • 10 Kaiser Aetna v. United States, 444 U.S. 164, 172-173.
  • 11 for Summary Judgment the United States asserts it can take Alameda Gateway,
  • 13 To support this assertion the Corps introduces facts that prove only that AGL's property
  • 14 to regulation under the Rivers and Harbors Appropriation Act of 1899,
  • 17 Congressional approval does not insulate the Corps from the requirement of compensation in
  • basin and the piers in the Basin, was inversely condemned by the Corps when it
  • refused to compensate AGL.
  • 18 private effort are not impressed with a servitude unless compensation is paid.4 The Corps
  • present case were created with the full consent of the federal government,
  • 12 piers in the navigable waters of the United States?"
  • 19 the Corps can remove the piers as an exercise of commerce authority,
  • waterways subject to federal regulatory jurisdiction, or it can refer to waterways subject to
  • 21 Corps omits the critical history of the property - a history about which the Corps has
  • 22 recitation of any undisputed fact relevant to the navigational servitude,
  •    |