 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1
.
STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
COMMISSION THOMAS GOOLNIK COURT FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION HEREBY FTC ACT COMPLAINT LAW NORTHERN DISTRICT BUSINESS PARTIES PERMANENT INJUNCTION JUDGEMENT CONSUMER PURSUANT PLAINTIFF ILLINOIS ADMISSION TLD NETWORKS FINANCIAL STATEMENTS REPRESENTATIVES UNITED STATES EMPLOYEES SELLING DOMAIN JOINT MOTION WRONGDOING WHATSOEVER DEFENDANTS ADMITTING LIABILITY INDEPENDENT CONTRACTORS |
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,
1
Plaintiff,
;
V. Case No. 02 CV 1475
-1~
TLD NETWORK LTD., QUANTUM Judge Holderman
MANAGEMENT U.S., INC., QUANTUM i
MANAGEMENT (GB) LTD., TBS > Magistrate Judge Ashman
INDUSTRIES LTD., TLD NETWORKS LTD., )
and THOMAS GOOLNIK, individually, and
as an officer of the above companies, ;
Defendants
STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER
FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND CONSUMER REDRESS
Plaintiff Federal Trade Commission ("Commission" or "FTC") having filed its
for a permanent injunction and other rehef in this matter, pursuant to Section 13(b) of
Trade Commission Act ("FTC Act"), 15 U.S.C. $ 53(b), respectively, and the parties
conferred through counsel, and having agreed to settle this action without adjudication or
of any issue of fact or law and without Defendants admitting liability for any of the
in the Complaint or for any wrongdoing whatsoever, therefore, on the joint motion of the
is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED as follows:
FINDINGS
1. This Court has jurisdiction of the subject matter of this case and of
consenting hereto.
2. Venue is proper as to all parties in the Northern District of Illinois
U.S.C. $8 1391(b), (c) & (d), and 15 U.S.C. 5 53(b).
3. The activities of Defendants are in or affecting commerce, as defined in
SNIPPETS:
|
|
2
.
TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
ASSETS COMMISSION PURSUANT RESTRAINING COURT FINANCI CONTROL PLAINTIFF ACT FEDERAL RULES CIVIL PROCEDURE ENJOINING CIV PRIOR MANAGEMENT DEPOSITIONS CUSTOMER REQUEST LIMITATION PROVISION PARTY REPORTS LEDGERS AFFILIATES BUSINESS SUBSIDIARIES IMMEDIATE DISPOSITION TLD NETWORK |
STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
~ EASTERN DIVISION
>
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, >
1
Plan& >
1
V. > Case No.
1
TLD NETWORK LTD., QUANTU/M >
MANAGEMENT (GB) LTD., TBSI >
INDUSTRIES LTD., THOMAS G$XHXIK, and )
EDWARD HARRIS GOOLNIK, individually, > I. -. .,-,m
: `""! ne
and as officers of the above compan,kes. > _ * ,d' i
Defendants.
RESTRAINING ORDER WITH
ASSET FREE AND OTHER EOUITABLE RELIEF
Plaintiff Federal'Trade Cornmission (`Commission" or "FTC"), having filed its
complaint for a permanent injunction and other relief in this matter, pursuant to Section
the Federal Trade Commission Act ("FI'C Act"), 15 U.S.C. 0 53(b), and having moved exparte
for a Temporary Restraining Order pursuant to Rule 65 of the Federal Rules of Civil
Fed. R. Civ. P. 65, and the Court having considered the complaint, declarations, exhibits
memorandum of law filed in support thereof, and now being advised in the premises,
1. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of the case, and
cause to believe that the Court will have jurisdiction over the parties;
2. Venue lies properly with this Court;
SNIPPETS:
|
|
3
.
MEMORANDUM
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
WEB SITES INTERNET RELIEF COURT TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER GOOLNIK FTC CONSUMERS DEFENDANTS SELL ATT FTC ACT FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION THOMAS GOOLNIK EQUITABLE RELIEF MATTER IMMEDIATE PRACTICES TLD NETWORK EDWARD HARRIS GOOLNIK INTERNET USERS DECEPTIVE PRACTICES UNITED STATES ICANN AUTHORITY REPRESENTATIONS CREDIT CARDS CONSUMER INJURY INJUNCTIVE RELIEF INDUSTRIES |
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLIN lfz i""
EASTERN DIVISION *..
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,
Plaintiff,
V.
TLD NETWORK LTD., QUANTUM
MANAGEMENT (GB) LTD., TBS
INDUSTRIES LTD., THOMAS GOOLNIK, and
EDWARD HARRIS GOOLNIK, individually,
and as officers of the above companies.
Defendants.
MEMORANDUM SUPPORTING PLAINTIFF'S EX PARTI? MOTION FOR
TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER, OTHER EQUITABLE RELIEF, AND ORDER
TO SHOW CAUSE WHY A PRELIMINARY JNJUNCTION SHOULD NOT ISSUE
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter involves straightforward Internet fraud. Defendants sell Internet
names that do not work, and almost assuredly will never be usable, over the Internet. '
Defendants send unsolicited email ("spam") falsely claiming that their domain names,
suffixes such as ".usa" and ".sex," work like recognized existing domain names with
". corn. " Defendants sell their domain names on professional looking Web sites that
deficiencies of the domain names. We ask that the Court bring this scam to an immediate
' Domain names assist Internet users to find Web sites and communicate via email.
11'1( 3.) For example, the domain name of the Federal Trade Commission - "ftc.gov" - is
to identify the FTC's Web site, www.ftc.gov, and email to the FTC is directed to
~~~~~~?~~-~~~~g~~~~~~
SNIPPETS:
|
|
4
.
COMPLAINT
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
FTC ACT CONSUMERS INTERNET VIOLATIONS RELIEF UNITED STATES PRACTICES COURT COMPLAINT DECEPTIVE ACTS COMMERCE THOMAS GOOLNIK EQUITABLE RELIEF DISTRICT PLAINTIFF INJURE CONSUMERS BUSINESS EXTENSION WEB SITES REGISTER UNITED KINGDOM PRINCIPLE FINCHLEY ROAD LONDON ENGLAND NW1 QUANTUM TBS CONCERT EDWARD HARRIS |
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISIoN
)
t
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, >
Plaintiff,
V. > Case No.
>
TLD NETWORK LTD., QUANTUM >
MANAGEMENT (GB) LTD., TBS >
INDUSTRXES LTD., THOMAS GOOLNIK, and )
EDWARD HARRIS GOOLNIK, individually, )
and as officers of the above companies. >
>
Defendants. )
COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE AND OTHER EOUITABLE RELIEF
Plaintiff, the Federal Trade Commission ("FTC" or "the Commission") for its
alleges as follows:
1. The FTC brings this action under Section 13(b) of the Federal Trade
Act (`FTC Act"), 15 U.S.C. 0 53(b), to secure temporary, preliminary, and permanent
relief, restitution, recission of contracts, disgorgement and other equitable relief for
deceptive acts or practices in violation of Section 5(a) of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. $
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
2. This Court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 15 U.S.C. $0
53(b), and 28 U.S.C. $0 1331, 1337(a) and 1345.
3. Venue in the United States District Court for the Northern District of
proper under 15 U.S.C. 0 53(b), and 28 U.S.C. $0 1391(b), (c) & (d).
SNIPPETS:
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|
