 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1
.
COMPLAINT
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
PHONES ACT DEFENDANTS SAFETSHIELD FTC ACT CELLULAR ADVERTISING CORDLESS NODANGER ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVES EAR TELEPHONES PRACTICES RADIATION CONSUMERS BRAIN REPRESENTATIONS VIOLATION ELECTROMAGNETIC ENERGY EARPIECE EXHIBIT MOBILE PHONE AFFECTING COMMERCE PENETRATING RELIEF DECEPTIVE ACTS SALE COURT PROTECT |
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case No.
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, )
)
Plaintiff )
)
v. )
)
STOCK VALUE 1, INC., a/k/a SV1, and )
DEBORAH JENKINS, )
)
Defendants. )
___________________________________)
COMPLAINT FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION
AND OTHER EQUITABLE RELIEF
Plaintiff, the Federal Trade Commission ("Commission" or "FTC"), by its undersigned
alleges as follows:
1. This is an action under Section 13(b) of the Federal Trade Commission Act
15 U.S.C. § 53(b), to secure a permanent injunction and other equitable relief against Defendants
deceptive acts or practices and false advertisements in connection with the advertising, marketing,
of purported electromagnetic radiation-blocking cellular telephone patches called "No Danger" and
"SafeTShield" in violation of Sections 5(a) and 12 of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 45(a) and 52.
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
2. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over Plaintiff's claim pursuant
1331, 1337(a) and 1345, and 15 U.S.C. §§ 45(a), 52 and 53(b).
3. Venue in this District is proper under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391(b) and (c) and 15 U.S.C.
53(b).
PLAINTIFF
SNIPPETS:
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|
