LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

FTC v 9094-5486 QUEBEC INC Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: FVQI101088, CourtCode: FED, CourtName: FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff: FTC, State: CA California, UniqueCaseRef: LCD>FVQI101088, Act, Consumers, Ftc Act, Federal Trade Commission, Qbi, Relief, Vouchers, Practices, Accommodations, Customers, Hotel Accommodations, Sale, Travel, Marketing, Violation, Charges, California, Injunction, Deceptive Acts, Promotion, Representation, District, Fees, Vacations, Deposit, Numerous Instances , ContentID: 120249907

Case Documents
1   COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 123517
6 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 6 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . COMPLAINT

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
ACT
CONSUMERS
FTC ACT
BUSINESS
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
QBI
RELIEF
VOUCHERS
PRACTICES
ACCOMMODATIONS
CUSTOMERS
HOTEL ACCOMMODATIONS
PLAINTIFF
SALE
TRAVEL
MARKETING
COURT
VIOLATION
CHARGES
CALIFORNIA
INJUNCTION
DECEPTIVE ACTS
PROMOTION
REPRESENTATION
DISTRICT
FEES
VACATIONS
DEPOSIT
NUMEROUS INSTANCES

   DEBRA A. VALENTINE
   General Counsel

   RAYMOND E. MCKOWN, Bar No. 150975
   JENNIFER LARABEE, Bar No. 163989
   Federal Trade Commission
   10877 Wilshire Blvd., Ste. 700
   Los Angeles, California 90024
   (310) 824-4343 ph.
   (310) 824-4380 fax

   Attorneys for Plaintiff
   FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

                        UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                       CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
                              WESTERN DIVISION

                    FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff,

                                     v.

                  QBI, INC., a California Corporation, and
    JEFFREY ALLEN DONOHUE, individually and as an officer of QBI, Inc.,
                                Defendants.

                                No. ________

            COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE AND OTHER EQUITABLE RELIEF

   Plaintiff, the Federal Trade Commission, ("FTC" or "Commission") for
   its complaint alleges:

   1. The FTC brings this action under Section 13(b) of the Federal Trade
   Commission Act ("FTC Act"), 15 U.S.C. § 53(b), to secure preliminary
   and permanent injunctive relief, restitution, rescission or
   reformation of contacts, disgorgement, and other equitable relief for
   the defendants' unfair or deceptive acts or practices in violation of
   Section 5(a) of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. § 45(a).

                           JURISDICTION AND VENUE

   2. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 15 U.S.C.
   §§ 45(a), and 53(b), and 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1337(a) and 1345.

   3. Venue is proper under 15 U.S.C. § 53(b) and 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b) and
   (c).
SNIPPETS:
  • Federal Trade Commission
  • UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
  • CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
  • FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff,
  • QBI, INC., a California Corporation, and JEFFREY ALLEN DONOHUE, individually and as an
  • COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE AND OTHER EQUITABLE RELIEF
  • The FTC brings this action under Section 13of the Federal Trade Commission Act, 15 U.S.C. §
  • The Commission is charged, inter alia, with enforcement of Section 5of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C.
  • Its principal place of business is 3711 Lomita Boulevard, Suite 190, Torrance, California
  • At all times relevant to this complaint, the defendants have maintained a substantial course
  • Since at least January 1996, defendants QBI and Donohue have marketed and sold a promotion to
  • The promotion centers on a travel voucher that defendants represent can be redeemed by a
  • The defendants sell the vouchers to the businesses for approximately $10 each.
  • The rack rate charges are higher than the typical rates available to consumers in the
  • Neither the vouchers nor other marketing materials disclose certain other charges consumers
  • The vouchers further represent that customers must post a $100 per person deposit to process
  • In numerous instances since at least 1996, in connection with the advertising, marketing,
  • In light of the representations made to consumers as set forth in paragraph 15, defendants'
  • Therefore, defendants' representation set forth in paragraph 18 is false and misleading and
  • Award plaintiff such preliminary injunctive and ancillary relief as may be necessary to avert
  •    |