 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1
.
CONSOLIDATED AMENDED COMPLAINT
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
CIGARETTES DEFENDANTS FACTS PHILIP MORRIS STOCK NICOTINE CLASS PERIOD MEMBERS COMMON TOBACCO SMOKING MISREPRESENTATIONS INDUSTRY DISREGARD ACT STOCK EXCHANGE ADDICTION DISCLOSE PARTICIPATING RULE LOB-5 PLAINTIFFS TOBACCO COMPANIES EVIDENCE RECKLESS COMMON QUESTIONS AFFECTING QUIT SMOKING DENOBLE FDA |
45jaw039.phm
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
----- 4 --------------------------------- x
BETTY GRAYSON KURZWmL and ROBERT
GRAYSON as trustees of the trust i
under the will of FLORENCE ROSENMAN, I
WILLIAM STEINER, and JERRY KING on I I
behalf of themselves and all others
similarly situated,
Plaintiff,
I
- against -
I
PHILIP MORRIS COMPANIES, INC., WILLIAI: ;
MURRAY, MICHAEL A. MILES, HANS G. I
STORR and WILLIAM I. CAMPBELL I I
Defendants. I 1 X
INTRODUCTICg
Plaintiffs for their Consol.dated
Action Complaint allege upon informat.on and
part, upon the investigation conducted by and
undersigned attorneys), except as to .,:hose paragraphs
the plaintiffs, their purchases of Ph.lip
("Philip Morris" or the "Company") common stock
suitability to serve as a class repre:entatives,
alleged upon personal knowledge, the iollowing:
JURISDICTION ANL VENUE
1. This Court has jurisdiction
matter of this action pursuant to seczion
Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Azt"),
28 U.S.C. 5 1331.
2. The claims asserted herein
45jaw039.phm
10(b) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act, :5
78t (ah and Rule lob-5 promulgated
and Exchange Commis&on (the IISECI'), :7
SNIPPETS:
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|
