LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

DIGI INTERNATIONAL CLASS ACTION LITIGATION Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: DICAL218551, CourtName: CLASS ACTION CASES, State: MA Massachusetts, UniqueCaseRef: LCD>DICAL218551, Daka, Digi, Allegations, Report, Act, Complaint, Aetherworks, Fuddruckers, Fraud, Securities, Class Plaintiffs, Lsers, Sales, Common Stock, Allege, Stock, Esq, Accounting, Exchange, Class Action, Lau, Dep, Analysts, Class Period, Motion, Restaurants, Misleading, Securities Exchange Act, Entry, Equity Method, Securities Fraud, Defendant Baumhauer, Champps, Aetherworks Transaction, Violation, York, Reform Act, Materially False, Disclosures, Coopers, Minogue, Matthew, Common-law , ContentID: 120249645

Case Documents
1   MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 122482
27 pages
PDF
2   COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 122479
58 pages
HTML
3 1999-11-03 DOCKET
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 122480
11 pages
HTML
4 1998-05-22 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER 2
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 122481
19 pages
TXT
Total Documents: 4 documents , 115 pages
Price: $ 34.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
DEFENDANTS
PLAINTIFFS
AETHERWORKS
COURT
ESQ
DEP
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
AETHERWORKS TRANSACTION
ACCOUNTING
YORK
COOPERS
EQUITY METHOD
STATE EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT
BADER
EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM
PLAINTIFF LOUISIANA STATE
MINNESOTA
MINNEAPOLIS
SECURITIES LITIGATION
CONVERTIBLE NOTES
INVESTMENT
LEE SQUITIERI
WOLF POPPER ROSS
WASHINGTON AVENUE SOUTH
RULE LOB-5
AGREEMENT
WALTON BADER
DISCLOSURE
SECURED CONVERTIBLE NOTES
                                   UNITED STATES  DISTRICT  COURT
                                      DISTRICT  OF MINNESOTA



                                                                            Civil No. 97-5 (DWF/RLE)

In  re Digi International Inc.
Securities Litigation

                                                                                     MEMORANDUM
                                                                             OPINION  AND ORDER


Richard  A. Lockridge, Esq., Gregg Fishbein, Esq., and  Gregory  J.  Myers,  Esq.,  Lockridge
Grindal  Nauen, 100 Washington Avenue South, Suite 2200,  Minneapolis,  Minnesota  55401;
Robert M. Kornreich, Esq., Wolf Popper Ross  Wolf & Jones, 12h Floor, 845 Third  Avenue, New
York, New  York 10022; and Lee Squitieri, Esq., Abbey,  Gardy & Squitieri, 212  East 39* Street,
New  York,  New York 10016, for Plaintiffs.

Harold  B.  Koritz, Esq.  and William G.  Cottrell, Esq., John A. Halpern & Associates, 500
Plymouth  Building, Minneapolis, Minnesota  55402;  and I. Walton  Bader,  Esq.,  Bader  and  Bader,
65 Court Street, Whte Plains, New York 10601; for Plaintiff Louisiana State Employees
Retirement Systems.

Wendy J. Wildug, Esq.  and h a
                                        M. Thoresen  Severts,  Esq., Faegre & Benson, 90 South
Seventh  Street, Suite 2200, Minneapolis, Minnesota  55402,  for  Defendants.


                                              Introduction
                      ..
                      M ,&-

        This action arises under Sections lo@) and  20(a) of the Securities Exchange  Act of 1934.
                             -
Plaintiff  Louisiana State Employees Retirement  System ("LSERS") and the putative  class

plaintiffs  (collectively, `Tlaintiffs") allege  that  Defendants Digi International; Inc. 

former  corporate officers Ervin F. Kamm, Jr.,  and  Gerald A. Wall artificially inflated  Digi's

earnings  during the  class period by using  improper accouiting methods to misrepresent Digi's

investment  in AetherWorks Corporation  ("AetherWorks").
                                                                                         AUG  1 7 
                                                                            FILED FRANCIS E. DC
                                                                            JUDGMENT ENTD
                                                                            DEPUTY CLERK
SNIPPETS:
  • In re Digi International Inc. Securities Litigation
  • Richard A. Lockridge, Esq., Gregg Fishbein, Esq., and Gregory J. Myers, Esq., Lockridge
  • and William G. Cottrell, Esq., John A. Halpern & Associates, 500 Plymouth Building,
  • Seventh Street, Suite 2200, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402, for Defendants.
  • Plaintiff Louisiana State Employees Retirement System and the putative class
  • investment in AetherWorks Corporation.
  • .A,&This action arises under Sections lo@) and 20of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
  • The Plaintiffs' Rule lob-5 and Section 20claims survived an earlier motion to dlsmiss
  • (Sachs Dep.
  • Pursuant to the agreement, Digi would also be obligated to purchase approximately $1.43
  • Defendant Wall was responsible for determining the correct accounting treatment of the
  • regarding the equity method of accounting.
  • determined that APB 18, the equity method, did not apply because the AetherWorks transaction
  • after consulting with Dig's outside auditors at Coopers & Lybrand,' that the notes receivable
  • In discussing the disclosure regarding the AetherWorks transaction,
  • The increase in notes receivable arose from the sale of the Company's former corporate

  • 2 . COMPLAINT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    DEFENDANTS
    REPORT
    FUDDRUCKERS
    SECURITIES
    SALES
    COMMON STOCK
    EXCHANGE
    CLASS ACTION
    ANALYSTS
    RESTAURANTS
    ACT
    PLAINTIFFS
    DEFENDANT BAUMHAUER
    CLASS PERIOD
    CHAMPPS
    MATERIALLY FALSE
    MISLEADING
    MANAGEMENT
    COMMUNICATIONS
    ROBERTSON STEPHENS
    ALLEGATIONS
    MASSACHUSETTS
    SUCCESSFUL
    PIPER JAFFRAY
    NEGATIVELY IMPACT FUDDRUCKERS
    FOODSERVICE
    INTER ALIA
    CONFERENCE
    SHAREHOLDERS
    
                         UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                      FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
    
    
    ___________________________________
                                       )
    RITA VENTURINO, COSMOS PHILLIPS    )  Civil Action No. 96-12109
    and MATTHEW MINOGUE on behalf      )
    of themselves and all others       )
    similarly situated,                )
                                       )  CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
                           Plaintiffs, )
                                       )
                   v.                  )
                                       )  PLAINTIFFS DEMAND A
    DAKA INTERNATIONAL, INC. and       )  TRIAL BY JURY
    WILLIAM H. BAUMHAUER,              )
                                       )
                           Defendants. )
    ___________________________________)
    
    
              Plaintiffs, by their attorneys, for their Class Action
    
    Complaint, make the following allegations upon personal knowledge
    
    as to themselves and their own acts and as to all other matters
    
    upon information and belief based upon, inter alia, the
    
    investigation made by and through their attorneys, which
    
    investigation has included a review of the public filings of DAKA
    
    International, Inc. ("DAKA" or the "Company") with the Securities
    
    and Exchange Commission ("SEC"), published reports and news
    
    articles regarding DAKA and other reliable sources derived from
    
    plaintiffs, investigation.  Plaintiffs believe that further
    
    substantial evidentiary support will exist for the allegations
    
    set forth below after a reasonable opportunity for discovery.
    
      __________________________________________________________________________
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • DAKA INTERNATIONAL,
  • Plaintiffs, by their attorneys, for their Class Action
  • make the following allegations upon personal knowledge
  • Inc. with the Securities
  • defendants and certain related parties,
  • Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and related
  • common stock throughout the Class Period.
  • Prior to and throughout the Class Period,
  • materially false and misleading statements and omissions
  • regarding sales results at the Company's Fuddruckers,
  • misleading and lacking in reasonable basis due
  • Corporate Place, 55 Ferncroft Road, Danvers, Massachusetts.
  • telephone communications and the facilities of the national
  • foodservice and restaurant company operating in the contract
  • foodservice management industry and in the restaurant industry.
  • Fuddruckers restaurants, which specialize in moderately-priced,
  • "Champps Sports Cafe," and the exclusive rights to develop Champps
  • Baumhauer signed the Form 10-K report filed
  • Defendant Baumhauer was
  • presentations to securities analysts and other public statements
  • Company during the Class Period were Robertson Stephens & Company
  • communications included, but were not limited to, conference
  • successful in hiding these material problems and trends from the
  • We negotiated a price so high for me and my shareholders
  • inter alia, the reasons stated in ¶¶ 39-46 above.
  • Similarly, on November 2, 1995, Piper Jaffray
  • negatively impact Fuddruckers' sales results going forward.

  • 3 . DOCKET

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    MOTION
    ENTRY
    MINOGUE
    MATTHEW
    COSMOS PHILLIPS
    RITA VENTURINO
    JUDGE GEORGE
    ENTERED CC/CL
    EXTEND TIME
    BAUMHAUER
    WILLIAM
    MEMORANDUM
    COUNSEL
    APPROVE
    GRANTING
    COMPLAINT
    SETTLEMENT
    DISMISS
    SUPPORT
    SELECTION
    APPOINTMENT
    AFFIDAVIT
    FUNDS
    DISTRIBUTION
    DUMAIN
    SANFORD
    FEES
    COURT
    PLAINTIFFS
    
    Case docket was last updated on: 11/03/99.
    
    
    Docket as of November 3, 1999 10:22 pm               Page 1
    
    Proceedings include all events.
    1:96cv12109 Venturino, et al v. Daka International, et al         CLOSED
    
                                                                CLOSED
                           U.S. District Court
              U.S. District Court - Massachusetts (Boston)
    
                  CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 96-CV-12109
    
    Venturino, et al v. Daka International, et al               Filed: 10/18/96
    Assigned to: Judge George A. O'Toole, Jr.    Jury demand: Plaintiff
    Demand: $0,000                               Nature of Suit:  850
    Lead Docket: None                            Jurisdiction: Federal Question
    Dkt# in other court: None
    
    Cause: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act
    
    
    RITA VENTURINO                    Edward F. Haber
         Plaintiff                    (COR LD NTC)
                                      Shapiro, Grace & Haber
                                      75 State Street
                                      Boston, MA 02109
                                      617-439-3939
    
                                      Sanford P. Dumain
                                      (COR LD NTC)
                                      Milberg, Weiss, Bershad, Hynes
                                      & Lerach
                                      One Penn Plaza
                                      New York City, NY 10002
    
                                      David J. Bershad
                                      (COR LD NTC)
                                      Jerome M. Congress
                                      (COR LD NTC)
                                      Salvatore J. Graziano
                                      (COR LD NTC)
                                      Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes &
                                      Lerach LLP
                                      One Pennsylvania Plaza
                                      49th Floor
                                      New York, NY 10119
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • U.S. District Court - Massachusetts
  • Judge George A. O'Toole,
  • MATTHEW MINOGUE, on behalf of Edward F. Haber
  • 10/18/96 1 Complaint filed.
  • (Entry date 10/24/96)
  • 10/18/96 -- Summons issued for Daka International, William H. Baumhauer
  • International (lau)
  • 11/6/96 4 Assented to Motion by Daka International,
  • Baumhauer to extend time to 12/13/96 to respond to
  • granting motion to extend time to 12/13/96 to respond
  • Entered cc/cl
  • 12/17/96 6 Motion by Rita Venturino, Cosmos Phillips, Matthew Minogue
  • of their selection of lead counsel,
  • 12/17/96 7 Memorandum by Rita Venturino, Cosmos Phillips, Matthew
  • Minogue in support of motion for their appointment
  • 12/17/96 8 Affidavit of Rita Venturino, Cosmos Phillips, Matthew
  • Matthew Minogue to be appointed lead plaintiffs for this
  • The motion to approve the selection
  • dismiss plaintiff's complaint, filed.
  • 12/19/97 -- Proposed Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement by Rita
  • for Sanford P. Dumain to appear pro hac vice,
  • Minogue for attorney fees and disbursements,
  • for distribution of class funds,
  • motion for distribution of class

  • 4 . MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER 2

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    PLAINTIFFS
    ALLEGATIONS
    DIGI
    COURT
    ACT
    COMPLAINT
    FRAUD
    CLASS PLAINTIFFS
    LSERS
    ALLEGE
    STOCK
    AETHERWORKS
    SECURITIES FRAUD
    VIOLATION
    REFORM ACT
    DISCLOSURES
    COMMON-LAW
    AETHERWORKS INVESTMENT
    MISLEADING
    ACCOUNTING
    PARTICULARITY
    CONTROLLING
    EQUITY METHOD
    CLASS PERIOD
    AMENDED COMPLAINT
    UNITED STATES DISTRICT
    SALES PROGRAM
    COMPENSATION
    INSUFFICIENT
    
                            UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
    
                               DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
    
       In re DIGI INTERNATIONAL INC.
       SECURITIES LITIGATION
       ________________________________________
    
       )
       )
       )
       )
       )
       )
    
       Civil Master File No.
       97-5 (JRT/RLE)
       (filed May 22, 1998)
    
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    AND ORDER
    
       This action involves allegations of securities fraud. In a
       consolidated amended complaint, a putative class of persons who
       purchased Defendant Digi International, Inc.'s ("Digi") stock between
       January 25, 1996 and December 23, 1996 ("class plaintiffs") allege
       securities fraud under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of
       1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b), and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, 17
       C.F.R. § 240.10b-5, and controlling person liability under Section
       20(a) of the 1934 Act, 15 U.S.C. § 78t(a). In a separate amended
       complaint, the Louisiana State Employees Retirement System ("LSERS"),
       a purchaser of Digi stock proceeding individually, alleges similar
       violations under sections 10(b) and 20(a). LSERS brings additional
       claims under Section 18(a) of the 1934 Act, 15 U.S.C. § 78r(a), and
       pursuant to the Minnesota common-law theories of fraud and negligent
       misrepresentation. Class plaintiffs and LSERS (collectively
       "plaintiffs") claim, in essence, that defendants Digi, Ervin F. Kamm,
       Jr., Gerald A. Wall, and Gary L. Deaner (collectively "defendants")
       knowingly or recklessly used improper accounting methods which allowed
       Digi to report artificially inflated earnings and concealed various
       material facts which would have informed the public of Digi's true
       financial condition during the relevant time period.
    
       Defendants have brought two motions to dismiss. In their first motion,
       defendants move to dismiss the class plaintiffs' complaint on the
       grounds that the Complaint fails to meet the pleading standards of the
       Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, 15 U.S.C. § 78u-4(b)
       ("Reform Act"), and Fed. R. Civ. P. 9(b) ("Rule 9(b)"), and fails to
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
  • In re DIGI INTERNATIONAL INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION
  • This action involves allegations of securities fraud.
  • In a consolidated amended complaint, a putative class of persons who purchased Defendant Digi
  • In a separate amended complaint, the Louisiana State Employees Retirement System, a purchaser
  • LSERS brings additional claims under Section 18of the 1934 Act, 15 U.S.C. § 78r, and pursuant
  • Class plaintiffs and LSERS claim, in essence, that defendants Digi, Ervin F. Kamm, Jr.,
  • The Court summarizes these allegations as if true solely for the purpose of addressing
  • During the class period, its stock was traded actively on the NASDAQ national market.
  • these defendants had access to various non-public information during the class period and had
  • The investment in AetherWorks was in the form of a convertible secured note in a principal
  • Plaintiffs further allege Digi never disclosed that its investment in AetherWorks was an
  • During most of the class period, Digi accounted for the AetherWorks investment using the
  • Based on these alleged omissions and improper accounting techniques, plaintiffs assert that
  • RULE 9AND THE REFORM ACT
  • Rule 9states that "in all averments of fraud or mistake, the circumstances constituting fraud
  • the complaints have set forth facts -- Deaner's sale of shares and the individual defendants'
  • The cases cited by defendants merely stand for the proposition that performance-based
  • These circumstances --which involve the alleged violation of accounting principles and other
  • Defendants also argue that plaintiffs' allegations regarding the "new sales program,"
  • The defendants also contend plaintiffs have failed to state a claim for controlling person
  •    |