LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

DAY RUNNER CLASS ACTION LITIGATION Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: DRCAL177626, CourtName: CLASS ACTION CASES, State: CA California, UniqueCaseRef: LCD>DRCAL177626, Runner, Act, Securities, Common Stock, Class Action, Violation, Exchange Act, Financial Statements, Complaint, Stull, Freeman, Federal Securities Laws, Misleading, Market, Yourman, Class Period, Damages, Brody, Individual Defendants, Los Angeles, United States, Vahn Alexander, Lisa Jones, Material Facts, Accounting, Disclosures, Catherine Redcliff, California, Entry, Representatives, Motion, Botticelli, Accepted Accounting Principles, Internal Control Structure, Gaap, Materially False , ContentID: 120249634

Case Documents
1   COMPLAINT B
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 122439
17 pages
TXT
2 2001-08-03 COMPLAINT A
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 122438
15 pages
PDF
3 1999-12-07 DOCKET A
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 122440
3 pages
TXT
4 1999-09-23 DOCKET B
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 122441
2 pages
TXT
Total Documents: 4 documents , 37 pages
Price: $ 34.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . COMPLAINT B

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
RUNNER
PLAINTIFFS
SECURITIES
ACT
CLASS ACTION
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
STULL
FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS
VIOLATION
FREEMAN
YOURMAN
CLASS PERIOD
BRODY
LOS ANGELES
MISLEADING
VAHN ALEXANDER
LISA JONES
INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS
ACCOUNTING
EXCHANGE ACT
UNITED STATES
DISCLOSURES
CATHERINE REDCLIFF
BOTTICELLI
ACCEPTED ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES
MATERIAL FACTS
INTERNAL CONTROL STRUCTURE
GAAP
MATERIALLY FALSE
99cv01161 Jones, et al v Day Runner, Inc, et al - 9/21/99 ComplaintWEISS &
YOURMAN
Kevin J. Yourman (147159)
Vahn Alexander (167373)
Ronald T. Theda (193223)
10940 Wilshire Blvd, 24th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90024
(310) 208-2800

STULL, STULL & BRODY
Michael D. Braun (170736)
10940 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 2300
Los Angeles, CA 90024
(310) 209-2468

Attorneys for Plaintiffs






UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SOUTHERN DIVISION






      LISA JONES and VINCE JONES On Behalf Of Themselves and All Others
      Similarly Situated

      Plaintiffs,

      v.

      DAY RUNNER INC., MARK A. VIDOVICH, JAMES E. FREEMAN, JR., DENNIS K.
      MARQUADT, DONALD E. BOTTICELLI, and CATHERINE REDCLIFF,
      Defendants.
      __________________________________________)
      )
      )
      )
      )
      )
      )
SNIPPETS:
  • 99cv01161 Jones, et al v Day Runner, Inc, et al - 9/21/99 ComplaintWEISS &
  • Kevin J. Yourman
  • Vahn Alexander
  • Los Angeles, CA 90024
  • STULL, STULL & BRODY
  • Attorneys for Plaintiffs
  • UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION
  • COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATION OF FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS
  • Plaintiffs bring this securities class action on behalf of a class of person
  • During the Class Period, Day Runner reported materially false and misleading financial
  • result of defendants' wrongful course of conduct, the price of Day Runner commo
  • these financial statements were deceptive and failed to conform with both mandatory SEC
  • As a result of these disclosures, plaintiffs have been damaged due to defendants' conscious
  • financial standards in violation of GAAP and SEC rules.
  • The jurisdiction of this Court is based upon §27 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15
  • The claims asserted herein arise under §§10and 20of the Exchange Act
  • Plaintiff Lisa Jones acquired Day Runner securities during the Class Period as indicated on
  • Defendant James A. Freeman,
  • Defendant Donald E. Botticelli is,
  • Defendant Catherine Redcliff is, and at all times relevant hereto has been the Vice
  • Defendants Vidovich, Freeman, Marquadt, Botticelli and Redcliff are collectively referred to
  • As officers, directors and/or controlling persons of a Company registered with the SEC under
  • There are questions of law and fact common to all class members which predominate over any Company; Whether defendants issued false financial statements and/or made materially
  • statements prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles have been
  • "Consideration of the Internal Control Structure in a Financial Statement Audit

  • 2 . COMPLAINT A

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    RUNNER
    DEFENDANTS
    COMMON STOCK
    PLAINTIFF
    COMPLAINT
    MARKET
    DAMAGES
    LAW
    EXCHANGE ACT
    SECURITIES
    MEMBERS
    REPRESENTATIVES
    MISLEADING
    COUNSEL
    CALIFORNIA
    NET INCOME
    REPORTED SALES
    ATTORNEYS
    RELEPHONE
    BROADWAY
    MATERIAL FACTS
    VIOLATION
    INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS
    CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER
    UNITED STATES
    REASONABLE COSTS
    PURCHASE
    DIRECTLY RELATING
    DEFENDANTS FREEMAN
    
     1  CHOENGOLD & SPORN, P.C.
     2  iamuel P. Spom, Esq. (SPS-4444)
           Xistopher  Lometti  (CL-9 124)
     3  'ay P. Saltanan (JPS-7335)
           !33 Broadway
     4  rJew  York, New York  10279
           relephone: (212) 964-0046
     5  LAW OFFICES OF LIONEL Z. GLANCY
     6  Lionel Z.  Glancy (134180)
           I801 Avenue of the Stars,  Suite  3 11
     7  20s Angela, California  90067
           relephone:  (310) 201-9150
     8  4ttorneys for Plaintiff
     9
    10                                     UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                                           CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
    11
    12
    13                      Plaintiff,                                                                 
    14
                  V.
    15
    
    16
    
    17
    
    18
    19                      Plaintiff,  individually and  on behalf of a 111  other persons similarly 
    20  undersigned counsel, for its complaint, alleges upon personal knowledge as to itself and its
    21  and upon information and belief as to all other matters, based upon, inter alia, the
    22  by and through its attorneys, as follows:
    23                                             N A T W  OF ACTION
    24            1.        PIaintiff brings this action  as a class action on behalf of itself and 
    25  who purchased the common stock of Day  Runner, Inc. CDay  Runner" or the "Company")  on the
    26  open  market during the period October 20,1998 through and including August 3 1,1999 (the
                                                                                                       
    27  Period") to recover damages caused by defendants' violation of the federal securities laws. 
    28  the Class Period, defendants issued to the investing public false and misleading financial
    
    
    
     1  and  press releases concerning Day Runntr's  publicly reported revenue and net income.
     2           2.      The materially false and  misleahng statements, which are described in detail
     3  concerned the Company's financial  condition, and were contained in public statements, filings
     4  the Securities and Exchaoge  Commission ("SEC',) and press releases.  AS a result ofthese false
     5  misleading statements, the market price of the Company's  common stock was artificially inflated
     6  during the Class Period.
     7           3.       On August 3 1, 1999, Day Runner  shocked the investing community when it
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • LAW OFFICES OF LIONEL Z. GLANCY
  • California 90067 relephone:
  • 22 by and through its attorneys,
  • 25 who purchased the common stock of Day Runner, Inc. CDay Runner" or the "Company") on the
  • 27 Period") to recover damages caused by defendants' violation of the federal securities laws.
  • defendants issued to the investing public false and misleading financial statements
  • and press releases concerning Day Runntr's publicly reported revenue and net income.
  • the market price of the Company's common stock was artificially inflated
  • 19 Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. $5 78j@) and 78t, and Rule lob-5, 17
  • Parkway, Imine, California.
  • Its products are carried by approximately 20,000 retail stores across 10 the United States.
  • Chief Operating Officer and Chief Executive Officer.
  • 17 as to constitute a fraud and deceit upon plaintiff and the other members of the Class.
  • affiliates, legal representatives, heirs, predecessors, successor and assigns of m y of rhe
  • 25 md has retained counsel competent and experienced in class actions and securities
  • time the defendants faiIed to disclose or misrepresented material facts and the time
  • 23 reported sales of S47,73 1,000, up 25.2% from $38,138,000 in the comparable period in the
  • The September 30,1998 10-Q G vas signed by defendants Freeman and Mquardt.
  • 19 was, among other things, to induce plaintiff and the other members of the Class to
  • Throughout the Class Period, Day Runner acted through the Individual Defendants, 26 whom it
  • COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE SECURmES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
  • beyond my pro rata share of any possible recovery, except for an award, as ordered by the
  • and expenses directly relating to our representation of the Class.
  • Schoengold & Sporn, P.C., 233 Broadway, New York, NY 10279 232-8092

  • 3 . DOCKET A

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    ENTRY
    DEFENDANT
    RUNNER
    MRGO
    ORD
    PROP
    LEAD CNSL
    APPVL
    LEAD PLFS
    APPT
    CONSOLIDATE
    DOCKET
    SECURITIES
    DISCOVERY ELGIN EDWARDS
    CARTER
    JUDGE DAVID
    MAHLER
    COURT
    DISTRICT
    SPECIFICS
    PRE-TRIAL ORDER
    SUPPT
    GLANCY
    LIONEL
    DECLARATION
    SUPPORT
    LAW
    MEMORANDUM
    LODGED PROP ORD
    
    Docket as of December 7, 1999 (retrieved 1/2/00)
    
    Proceedings include all events.
    8:99cv1096 Arnold Nelson Mahler, et al v. Day Runner, Inc, et al         (EEx)
    
                                                                (EEx)
                           U.S. District Court
              Central District of California (Southern Div)
    
                   CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 99-CV-1096
    
    Arnold Nelson Mahler, et al v. Day Runner, Inc, et al       Filed: 09/02/99
    Assigned to: Judge David O. Carter
                 Referred to: Discovery Elgin Edwards
    Demand: $0,000                               Nature of Suit:  850
    Lead Docket: None                            Jurisdiction: Federal Question
    Dkt# in other court: None
    
    Cause: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act
    
    
    ARNOLD NELSON MAHLER              Samuel P Sporn
         plaintiff                    (COR LD NTC)
                                      Jay P Saltzman
                                      (COR LD NTC)
                                      Christopher Lometti
                                      (COR LD NTC)
                                      Schoengold & Sporn
                                      233 Broadway
                                      New York, NY 10279
                                      212-964-0046
    
                                      Lionel Z Glancy
                                      FAX 310-201-9160
                                      (COR LD NTC)
                                      Lionel Z Glancy Law Offices
                                      1801 Avenue of the Stars
                                      Ste 311
                                      Los Angeles, CA 90067
                                      310-201-9150
    
    
    ROBERTA JO MAHLER FAMILY TRUST,   Samuel P Sporn
    on behalf of itself and all       (See above)
    others similarly situated         (COR LD NTC)
         plaintiff                    Jay P Saltzman
                                      (See above)
                                      (COR LD NTC)
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • Docket as of December 7,
  • U.S. District Court
  • Central District of California
  • Arnold Nelson Mahler, et al v.
  • Day Runner, Inc, et al Filed: 09/02/99 Assigned to: Judge David O. Carter
  • Cause: 15:78mSecurities Exchange Act
  • referred to Discovery Elgin Edwards
  • (Entry date 09/07/99)
  • 11/1/99 3 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION by defendant Day Runner,
  • motion hearing set for 8:30 12/6/99 Lodged prop ord (mrgo)
  • 11/1/99 4 MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT by defendant Day Runner,
  • of dft's motion to consolidate cases, motion for appt
  • of lead plfs, motion for appvl of lead cnsl,
  • 11/1/99 5 DECLARATION of Lionel Z Glancy by defendant Day Runner,
  • in suppt of dft's motion to consolidate cases,
  • 12/1/99 6 PRE-TRIAL ORDER #1 approved by Judge David O. Carter (see
  • doc for specifics)

  • 4 . DOCKET B

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    DOCKET
    ENTRY
    JONES
    ELGIN EDWARDS
    DISCOVERY
    COURT
    DISTRICT
    PLF LISA JONES
    CERTIFICATION
    CATHERINE REDCLIFF
    DONALD BOTTICELLI
    DENNIS MARQUADT
    FREEMAN
    JAMES
    VIDOVICH
    MARK
    RUNNER
    PLAINTIFF
    BRAUN
    MICHAEL
    VINCE
    SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
    DKT
    CIVIL DOCKET
    SOUTHERN DIV
    CALIFORNIA
    CENTRAL DISTRICT
    
    Docket as of September 23, 1999 (retrieved 1/2/00)
    
    Proceedings include all events.
    8:99cv1161 Lisa Jones, et al v. Day Runner, Inc, et al                   (EEx)
    
                                                                (EEx)
                           U.S. District Court
              Central District of California (Southern Div)
    
                   CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 99-CV-1161
    
    Lisa Jones, et al v. Day Runner, Inc, et al                 Filed: 09/21/99
    Assigned to: Judge David O. Carter           Jury demand: Plaintiff
                 Referred to: Discovery Elgin Edwards
    Demand: $0,000                               Nature of Suit:  850
    Lead Docket: None                            Jurisdiction: Federal Question
    Dkt# in other court: None
    
    Cause: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act
    
    
    LISA JONES, On Behalf of          Michael D Braun
    Herself and All Others            FAX 310-209-2087
    Similarly Situated                (COR LD NTC)
         plaintiff                    Stull Stull & Brody
                                      10940 Wilshire Blvd
                                      Suite 2300
                                      Los Angeles, CA 90024
                                      310-209-2468
    
                                      Kevin J Yourman
                                      FAX 310-209-2348
                                      (COR LD NTC)
                                      Vahn Alexander
                                      (COR LD NTC)
                                      Ronald Thomas Theda
                                      (COR LD NTC)
                                      Weiss & Yourman
                                      10940 Wilshire Blvd
                                      24th Fl
                                      Los Angeles, CA 90024
                                      310-208-2800
    
    
    VINCE - JONES, On Behalf of       Michael D Braun
    Himself and All Others            (See above)
    Similarly Situated                (COR LD NTC)
         plaintiff
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • Docket as of September 23,
  • U.S. District Court
  • Central District of California (Southern Div)
  • CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #:
  • Referred to: Discovery Elgin Edwards
  • Dkt# in other court: None
  • Cause: 15:78mSecurities Exchange Act
  • VINCE - JONES, On Behalf of Michael D Braun
  • DAY RUNNER, INC
  • MARK A VIDOVICH
  • JAMES E FREEMAN, JR
  • DENNIS MARQUADT
  • DONALD BOTTICELLI
  • CATHERINE REDCLIFF
  • Elgin Edwards (Entry date 09/23/99)
  • 9/21/99 2 CERTIFICATION of Interested Parties filed by plf Lisa Jones
  •    |