![]() |
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1
.
PLTFFS COMBINED RESP TO DEF
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
No key words found in document. -------------- This indicates that document is an image. -------------- Images in PDF files often contain text readable by persons but not by scanners. |
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
EASTERN DIVISION
JOHN VENTRE, MARY H. O'NEIL
and HAROLD O'NEIL, individually
and 'as representatives on behalf
of a class of similarly situated
persons,
Plaintiffs,
V. ) Judge
DATRONIC RENTAL CORPORATION, an
lllinois corporation, et al.,
Defendants.
PLAINTIFFS' COMBINFsD RESPONSE TO
DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS
THE SEVENTH AMENDED COMPLAINT
This brief is respectfully submitted
plaintiff class in opposition to the motions
Price Waterhouse ("Price"), Weiss and Company
Siegan, Barbakoff, Gomberg & Kane ("SB&G")
through XXX1 of the Seventh Amended Complaint
violations of the Securities laws and seeking
therefor.
STATEMENT OF FACTS
Datronic Rental Corporation ("Datronic"),
capital for its operations, created a series
partnerships. The earliest, as is typical,
placements involving relatively small
amounts of cash. In April 1987, after the apparent
the earlier ventures, Datronic began to offer
interests publicly, 1 in much more substantial
Between April 1987 and April 30, 1991, Datronic
SNIPPETS:
|
| | | |