 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1
.
COMPLAINT
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
DARK FIBER CAPROCK STOCK SECONDARY OFFERING FIBER NETWORK SHARES CAPROCK COMMUNICATIONS CUSTOMERS CARRIER CLASS ACTION MCALEER REVENUE SOUTHWEST DEMAND CYR UNITED STATES EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURCHASED SHARES FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS IRUS CONSTRUCTION INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS INTEGRATED SERVICES IRUS SOLD PROJECTIONS LONG-HAUL FIBER NETWORK SCALABLE LONG-HAUL FIBER ACQUIRED CAPROCK CAPROCK COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION |
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
DALLAS DIVISION
_____________________________________________
HECTOR ALFARO, On Behalf of
Himself and All Others Similarly
Situated,
Plaintiff,
vs.
CAPROCK COMMUNICATIONS
CORPORATION, LEO J. CYR, JERE
W. THOMPSON, JR. and KEVIN W.
McALEER,
Defendants.
_____________________________________________
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Civil Action No.
CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
SNIPPETS:
|
|
2
.
DOCKET
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
VDF DEFENDANT CIVIL ACTION ENTRY CONSOLIDATED PLAINTIFF JUDGE ORDER CONSOLIDATING BUCHMEYER COUNSEL REFERENCE MATTER DOCKET FUTURE PLEADINGS ISSUED-4 MCALEER KEVIN THOMPSON JERE CYR LEO CAPROCK HECTOR ALFARO DEMAND JURY ASSIGNMENT COURT DISTRICT CONSOLIDATED LEAD SPECIFICS JUDGE PAUL STICKNEY |
Case docket was last updated on: 09/06/00.
Docket as of September 6, 2000 5:11 pm Page 1
Proceedings include all events. M-STI
3:00cv1613 Alfaro, et al v. Caprock Comm, et al LEAD
JURY
M-STI LEAD
JURY
U.S. District Court
Northern District of Texas (Dallas)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 00-CV-1613
Alfaro, et al v. Caprock Comm, et al Filed: 07/26/00
Assigned to: Chief Judge Jerry Buchmeyer Jury demand: Plaintiff
Demand: $0,000 Nature of Suit: 850
Lead Docket: None Jurisdiction: Federal Question
Dkt# in other court: None
Cause: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act
HECTOR ALFARO, On behalf of Marc R Stanley, Attorney at Law
himself and all others 214/443-0358 FAX
similarly situated (COR LD NTC ret)
plaintiff Stanley Mandel & Iola
3100 Monticello Ave
Suite 750
Dallas, TX 75205
USA
214/443-4300
ANGELA AMOS, On behalf of Thomas E Bilek, Attorney at Law
herself and all others 713/227-9404 FAX
similarly situated (COR LD NTC ret)
consolidated plaintiff Hoeffner Bilek & Eidman
440 Louisiana
Suite 720
Houston, TX 77002-1634
USA
713/227-7720
TERESA A CICALA Marc R Stanley, Attorney at Law
consolidated plaintiff (See above)
SNIPPETS:
|
|
3
.
CONSOLIDATED AMENDED COMPLAINT
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
CYBERGUARD REVENUES PLAINTIFFS COMMON STOCK SALES LOSS CARBERRY ACT FACTS REPRESENTATIONS MISLEADING EXECUTIVE OFFICER AUDIT ASSETS GROSS PROFIT RESELLERS MISREPRESENTATIONS GROSS MARGIN KPMG GAAP CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OPERATING LOSS CONTRACTS CYKRGUARD SECURITY PRODUCTS ALLEGATIONS SET FCLNH SUBSTANTIAI CYBEFFIUARD FRAUDULENT |
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NIGHT
FOR THE !WJTHERN DISTRICT QF FILED
FLORiDA
MIAMI PIVISION
STEVEN CHENEY at al.. individually ~rul
on behaIf of all others simikIy ~ituatcd, ;
Plaintiff, i 1
V.
1
CYBERGUARD CORPORATIOFd, ROBERT )
L. CARBERRY and WILLIAM D. MURRAY, )
Defendants. ;
_--- -_l_l---__._____T1_ * .__* - LI--q" _"ch-ewmm+qM*
q_+-. -"---I x
CONSQLT'DATED AND AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
Lead plabtiffs Robert Ciovic, Michael Brown, Sudhir Mehta, Anthony Paoltiico,
I&IO Miller, Etiot Meshularn. Jorin Daieanes, Thomas Schueck and Mary LOU Htivey
("Plaintiffs') make the allegations set fclnh in this Amended Class Action Complaint upon
information and belief, except those allegations specifically pertaining to Plaintiffs or
cour~l. which allegations are based on Plaintiffs' personal knowlerlge.
1.
NATTJREOFTHEACTION
I. This is a wurities fraud class action brought on behalf of a class (the
consisting of in\lestors who acguired the common stock of defendant CyberGuard
&qorarion ("CyberGuard" or the `Company") between November 7, 1996 and August 24,
3998 (the "Class Period"), and who wecc damaged thereby. Plaintiffs seek re&iea under
tht &&tics and Exctige Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act*`).
2. The defendants i~ltie: (a) Robert Carberry, who was CyberGuard's
SNIPPETS:
|
|
4
.
COMPLAINT
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
TRUTH ARCA ACUUISITION INDICATORS REVENUE RECOGNITION BASIS |
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
---X
EDWIN DICKLER, individually and on Civil
behalf of,all others similarly
situated, CLASS
Plaintiff,
- v. - : JURY
CYBERGUARD CORPORATION, ROBERT L.
CARBERRY and WILLIAM D. MURRAY,
Defendants.
Plaintiff, individually and on behalf
persons similarly situated, by his undersigned
complaint, alleges upon personal knowledge as
own acts, and upon information and belief as to
matters, based upon, inter alia, the investigation
through his attorneys, which investigation
things, a review of the public documents,
Commission ("SECVV) filings, analyst reports,
media reports, regarding CyberGuard Corporation
the t'Companytt), as follows:
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
1. The claims alleged herein arise
10(b) and 20 of the Securities Exchange Act of
"Exchange Act"), 15 U.S.C. §§ 78j(b) and 78t, and
C.F.R. § 240.10b-5 promulgated thereunder.
2. The jurisdiction of this Court
27 of the Exchange Act, 15 U.S.C. § 78aa and 28
SNIPPETS:
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|
