 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1
.
PARTY AND COUNSEL LIST
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
No key words found in document. -------------- This indicates that document is an image. -------------- Images in PDF files often contain text readable by persons but not by scanners. |
5:98cv20104 Leff v. Cor Therapetics, Inc, et al
TERMED
U.S. District Court
U.S. District for the Northern District of California (San Jose)
ROBERT LEFF Alan Schulman
Plaintiff (COR LD NTC)
Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes &
Lerach LLP
600 W Broadway Ste 1800
One America Plaza
San Diego, CA 92101
(619) 231-1058
Lisa K. Buckser
(COR LD NTC)
Bernstein Litowitz Berger &
Grossmann
1285 Avenue of the Americas
33rd Flr
New York, NY 10019
(212) 554-1400
v.
COR THERAPETICS, INC
defendant
VAUGHN M. KAILIAN
defendant
SNIPPETS:
|
|
2
.
COMPLAINT
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
PLAINTIFFS SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT FACTS LAWS CLASS PERIOD COUNSEL ALLEGATIONS COMPLAINT MEMBERS COMMON STOCK PURSUANT DAVID FINKELSTEIN MISLEADING MATERIALLY FALSE INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS CENTENNIAL TECHNOLOGIES MASSACHUSETTS REPRESENTATIONS ARTIFICIALLY INFLATED PRICES MISREPRESENTATIONS FINANCIAL CONDITION FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS ADVERSE NON-PUBLIC INFORMATION RELEVANT TIMES FINANCIAL REPORTING BUSINESS PROSPECTS DISSEMINATION MANAGEMENT |
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
____________________________________
)
RONALD SCHWARTZ and )
DAVID FINKELSTEIN, on behalf of )
themselves and all )
others similarly situated, )
) CASE NO. 97-10304-REK
)
Plaintiffs, ) CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
) FOR VIOLATIONS OF
v. ) FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS
)
CENTENNIAL TECHNOLOGIES INC.; )
EMANUEL PINEZ; and JAMES M. )
MURPHY; )
)
Defendants. )
____________________________________)
Plaintiffs make the following allegations upon
information and belief, except as to allegations specifically
pertaining to the plaintiffs and their counsel, based on the facts
alleged below, which are predicated upon the investigation
undertaken by plaintiffs' counsel, and plaintiffs believe that
further substantial evidentiary support will exist for the
allegations set forth below after a reasonable opportunity for
discovery.
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
1. The claims asserted herein arise under and pursuant
SNIPPETS:
|
|
3
.
DOCKET
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
CENTENNIAL TEC ENTRY CENTENNIAL TECHNOL MOTION C/S COURT BFC DAVID FINKELSTEIN NTC COR GLEN DEVALERIO RONALD SCHWARTZ RAMAEKERS LAWRENCE JUDGE ROBERT DEFENDANT MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE MEMORANDUM COMPLAINT SETTLEMENT EXTEND TIME ORDER ENTERED GRANTING OPPOSITION AMENDED COMPLAINT CLASS PLAINTIFFS STIPULATION APPROVAL HEARING CENTENNIAL TECH LEAD DERIVATIVE COUNSEL |
Case docket was last updated on: 09/12/00.
Docket as of September 12, 2000 10:57 pm Page 1
Proceedings include all events.
1:97cv10304 In Re Centennial Tec, et al v. Centennial Technol, et al
LEAD
LEAD
U.S. District Court
U.S. District Court - Massachusetts (Boston)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 97-CV-10304
In Re Centennial Tec, et al v. Centennial Technol, et al Filed: 02/11/97
Assigned to: Judge Robert E. Keeton Jury demand: Both
Demand: $0,000 Nature of Suit: 160
Lead Docket: None Jurisdiction: Federal Question
Dkt# in other court: None
Cause: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act
RONALD SCHWARTZ, on behalf of Glen DeValerio
themselves and all others (COR LD NTC)
similarly situated Norman Berman
Plaintiff (COR LD NTC)
Berman, DeValerio & Pease
One Liberty Square
Boston, MA 02109
617-542-8300
David Bershad
(COR LD NTC)
Milberg, Weiss, Bershad, Hynes
& Lerach
One Penn Plaza
New York City, NY 10002
Stanley Bernstein
(COR LD NTC)
Bernstein Liebhard & Lifshitz,
LLP
10 East 40th Street
New York, NY 10016
USA
212 779-1414
SNIPPETS:
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|
