LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

CONCUR TECHNOLOGIES CLASS ACTION LITIGATION Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: CTCAL226358, CourtName: CLASS ACTION CASES, State: NY New York, UniqueCaseRef: LCD>CTCAL226358, Offering, Shares, Concur, Commissions, Prospectus, Securities, Common Stock, Exchange, Materials, Price, Underwriting, Market, Omissions, Material Misrepresentations, Transactions, Regulation S-k, Exchange Act, Aftermarket, Material Facts, Class Period, Registration Statement, States District Court, Selling Stockholders, Misleading, Ipo, Allocations, Materially False , ContentID: 120249594

Case Documents
1 1998-12-13 COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 122229
17 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 1 document , 17 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . COMPLAINT

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
SHARES
DEFENDANT
CONCUR
COMMISSIONS
PROSPECTUS
SECURITIES
PLAINTIFF
COMMON STOCK
EXCHANGE
MATERIALS
PRICE
UNDERWRITING
MARKET
OMISSIONS
ATTORNEYS
MATERIAL MISREPRESENTATIONS
TRANSACTIONS
REGULATION S-K
EXCHANGE ACT
AFTERMARKET
MATERIAL FACTS
CLASS PERIOD
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
STATES DISTRICT COURT
SELLING STOCKHOLDERS
MISLEADING
IPO
ALLOCATIONS
MATERIALLY FALSE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

GERALD PLATTS, on behalf of himself and all              :
others similarly situated,                               :: Index No.
                                     Plaintiff,          :: CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
                                                               FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE
                              vs.                        :: FEDERAL SECURITIES
                                                               LAWS
BANCBOSTON ROBERTSON STEPHENS, INC.,                     ::
                                     Defendant.          ::

       Plaintiff, by his undersigned attorneys, individually and on behalf of the Class described

below, upon information and belief, based upon, inter alia, the investigation of counsel, which

includes, among other things, a review of public announcements made by defendant, Securities

and Exchange Commission ("SEC") filings made by defendant, and press releases, and media

reports, except as to the paragraph applicable to the named plaintiff which is alleged upon

personal knowledge, brings this Complaint (the "Complaint") against the defendant named

herein, and alleges as follows:

                                          SUMMARY OF ACTION

       1.      This is a securities class action alleging that the Registration Statement dated

December 13, 1998 and the Prospectus dated December 16, 1998 for the issuance and initial

public offering of 3,100,000 shares of Concur Technologies, Inc. ("Concur" or the "Company")

common stock, contained material misrepresentations and/or omissions.   The Registration

Statement and Prospectus are referred to herein collectively as the "Prospectus."



           2.    Concur describes itself as a leading provider of Intranet-based employee-facing

applications that extend automation to employees throughout the enterprise and to partners,

vendors and service providers in the extended enterprise.  Its principal place of business is

located at 6222 185th Avenue NE, Redmond, Washington 98052.  Defendant is an underwriter of

the Offering, who engaged in a pattern of conduct to surreptitiously extract inflated commissions
SNIPPETS:
  • UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
  • Plaintiff, by his undersigned attorneys, individually and on behalf of the Class described
  • includes, among other things, a review of public announcements made by defendant, Securities
  • and Exchange Commission filings made by defendant, and press releases, and media
  • This is a securities class action alleging that the Registration Statement dated
  • December 13, 1998 and the Prospectus dated December 16, 1998 for the issuance and initial
  • public offering of 3,100,000 shares of Concur Technologies, Inc.
  • common stock, contained material misrepresentations and/or omissions.
  • the Offering, who engaged in a pattern of conduct to surreptitiously extract inflated
  • greater than those disclosed in the Offering materials,
  • of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
  • Plaintiff Gerald Platts purchased shares of Concur during the Class Period.
  • as well as to increase the Company's equity capital, create a public market for the Company's
  • Of the 3,100,000 shares of Common Stock offered hereby, 2,900,000 shares are being sold by
  • See "Underwriting" for information relating to the method of determining the initial public
  • If such an option is exercised in full, the total Price to Public, Underwriting Discounts and
  • make huge profits by reselling the shares at much higher prices in the aftermarket.
  • agreed to and did pay defendant excessive commissions on transactions in other securities
  • payment by certain investors of extra-large, undisclosed "kickbacks" for allocations in
  • The NASD is examining IPO allocation practices at several securities firms, including
  • Defendant's False and Misleading Statements
  • Regulation S-K specifically governs the forepart of the Registration Statement and outside
  • The Prospectus violated Regulation S-K and was materially false and misleading
  • untrue statements of material fact and/or omitted to state material facts necessary to make
  • Such defendant's material misrepresentations and/or omissions were done
  •    |