LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

CONAGRA FOODS CLASS ACTION LITIGATION Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: CFCAL189178, CourtName: CLASS ACTION CASES, State: NE Nebraska, UniqueCaseRef: LCD>CFCAL189178, Conagra, Securities, Class Action, Exchange Act, Conagra Foods, Reports, Common Stock, Rohde, Earnings, Misleading, Materially False, Sales, Individual Defendants, Uap, Artificially Inflated Prices, Purchasers, Reported Net Sales, Material Facts, Accounting Practices, Market Price, Net Income, Allegations, United States, Normal Recurring Adjustments, Management, Financial Position , ContentID: 120249593

Case Documents
1 2001-05-23 COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 122228
25 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 1 document , 25 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . COMPLAINT

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
SECURITIES
PLAINTIFF
DEFENDANTS
CLASS ACTION
EXCHANGE ACT
CONAGRA FOODS
REPORTS
COMMON STOCK
ROHDE
EARNINGS
MEMBERS
MISLEADING
MATERIALLY FALSE
SALES
BUSINESS
INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS
UAP
ARTIFICIALLY INFLATED PRICES
PURCHASERS
REPORTED NET SALES
MATERIAL FACTS
ACCOUNTING PRACTICES
MARKET PRICE
NET INCOME
ALLEGATIONS
UNITED STATES
NORMAL RECURRING ADJUSTMENTS
MANAGEMENT
FINANCIAL POSITION
                          IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                               FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

__________________________________________
JOHN GEBHARDT, Individually And On                           ) CASE NO.
Behalf Of All Others Similarly Situated,                     ))
                                 Plaintiff,                  )) CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
                vs.                                          ) FOR VIOLATIONS OF
                                                             ) FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS
CONAGRA FOODS INC., BRUCE C. ROHDE, )
JAMES P. O'DONNELL, KENNETH W. DIFONZO, )
and JAY D. BOLDING,                                          ) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
                                                             )
                                 Defendants.                 ))
__________________________________________


        Plaintiff has alleged the following based upon the investigation of plaintiff's counsel,

a review of United States Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") filings by ConAgra Foods Inc.,

("ConAgra" or the "Company"), as well as regulatory filings and reports, securities analysts

advisories about the Company, press releases and other public statements issued by the Company, and

media reports about the Company, and plaintiff believes that substantial additional evidentiary

exist for the allegations set forth herein after a reasonable opportunity for discovery.

                                      NATURE OF THE ACTION

        1.      This is a federal class action on behalf of purchasers of the common stock of

between August 28, 1998 and May 23, 2001, inclusive (the "Class Period"), seeking to pursue remedies

under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act").



                                     JURISDICTION AND VENUE

            2.    The claims asserted herein arise under and pursuant to Sections 10(b) and 20(a)

Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. §§ 78j(b) and 78t(a)] and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder by the

and Exchange Commission ("SEC") [17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5].

            3.    This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action pursuant to 28

SNIPPETS:
  • Plaintiff has alleged the following based upon the investigation of plaintiff's counsel,
  • a review of United States Securities and Exchange Commission filings by ConAgra Foods Inc.,
  • , as well as regulatory filings and reports, securities analysts reports and
  • This is a federal class action on behalf of purchasers of the common stock of ConAgra
  • Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder by the Securities
  • Many of the acts charged herein, including the preparation and dissemination of materially
  • and misleading information, occurred in substantial part in this District.
  • their chief executive offices and principal place of business within this District.
  • In connection with the acts alleged in this complaint, defendants, directly or indirectly,
  • The individual defendants identified below,
  • positions with the Company, directly participated in the management of the Company, was
  • management, earnings and present and future business prospects, and to correct any
  • and caused plaintiff and other members of the Class to purchase
  • ConAgra securities at artificially inflated prices.
  • PLAINTIFF'S CLASS ACTION ALLEGATIONS
  • Period misrepresented material facts about the business, operations, financial statements of
  • Defendant Rohde commented as follows:
  • Our preliminary findings indicate that certain conduct at UAP circumvented generally accepted
  • After reviewing the results of the investigation, the Company has determined that UAP
  • $6,483,400,000, and net income of $109,300,000, or $0.23 basic earnings per share.
  • The unaudited interim financial information included herein reflects the adjustments
  • second quarter of 1999, the Company reported net sales of $6,404,400,000, and net income of
  • securities relying upon the integrity of the market price of ConAgra's securities and market
  •    |