LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

COMPAQ COMPUTER CLASS ACTION LITIGATION Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: CCCAL205924, CourtName: CLASS ACTION CASES, State: TX Texas, UniqueCaseRef: LCD>CCCAL205924, Compaq, Securities, Channel, Report, Sales, Price, Analysts, Exchange, Class Period, Act, Motion, Compaq Stock, Distribution, Inventory, Market, Build-to-order, Entry, Vice President, Odm, Personal Computer, Receivables, Material Non-public Information, Compensation, Representatives, Federal Securities Laws, Violations, Chief Financial Officer, Senior Vice President, Channel Stuffing, Individual Defendants, Judge Vanessa, Appointment, Consolidate, Lead Pltfs, Gilmore, Compaq Computer , ContentID: 120249584

Case Documents
1   CONSOLIDATED AMENDED COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 122190
88 pages
TXT
2 1999-06-21 LEAD DOCKET
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 122191
8 pages
TXT
Total Documents: 2 documents , 96 pages
Price: $ 24.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . CONSOLIDATED AMENDED COMPLAINT

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
DEFENDANTS
PLAINTIFFS
SECURITIES
CHANNEL
REPORT
SALES
PRICE
ANALYSTS
EXCHANGE
CLASS PERIOD
ACT
COMPAQ STOCK
DISTRIBUTION
INVENTORY
MARKET
BUILD-TO-ORDER
VICE PRESIDENT
ODM
PERSONAL COMPUTER
RECEIVABLES
MATERIAL NON-PUBLIC INFORMATION
COMPENSATION
REPRESENTATIVES
FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS
VIOLATIONS
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT
CHANNEL STUFFING
INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS


                    IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                    FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                             HOUSTON DIVISION

   _____________________________________________

   BERGER, et al.,

   Plaintiffs,

   v.

   COMPAQ COMPUTER CORP., et al.,

   Defendants.

   _____________________________________________

   :

   :

   :

   :

   :

   :

   Consolidated Civil Action No. 98-1148


                     CONSOLIDATED AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR

                   VIOLATION OF FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS

   Plaintiffs, as and for their consolidated amended complaint, allege
   the following upon personal knowledge as to themselves, their counsel,
   and their own acts, including plaintiffs' suitability to serve as
   class representatives. All other allegations herein are based upon the
   investigation of Compaq Computer Corp. ("Compaq" or the "Company")
   conducted by plaintiffs by and through their attorneys, which
   included, inter alia, a review of public filings of defendant Compaq
SNIPPETS:
  • COMPAQ COMPUTER CORP., et al.,
  • VIOLATION OF FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS
  • Plaintiffs, as and for their consolidated amended complaint, allege the following upon
  • This Court has jurisdiction over this litigation under Section 27 of the Securities Exchange
  • Venue is proper in this district pursuant to Section 27 of the Exchange Act because defendant
  • In connection with the conduct complained of herein, defendants, directly or indirectly, used
  • largest personal computer manufacturer in the world.
  • Combined, its three largest competitors, IBM, Hewlett Packard and Dell Computer Corp.,
  • Dell builds each PC to order and keeps virtually no inventory of finished PC's or components
  • Compaq's sales model requires it to project customer demand and manufacture enough product in
  • In addition, Compaq delivers all its finished product to distributors and dealers, known in
  • Compaq's sales model, therefore, unlike Dell's, has been historically heavily dependent upon
  • By mid-1996, approximately one year prior to the beginning of the Class Period, Company
  • By July 10, 1997, the beginning of the Class Period, defendants realized that the ODM was
  • However, for several reasons, defendants were determined to postpone this negative news about
  • Defendants used the high price of Compaq's stock to purchase both Tandem computers, Inc. for
  • Second, the Individual Defendants had much of their wealth tied up in Compaq stock and
  • Third, much of the Individual Defendants' compensation was in the form of year-end bonuses,
  • Although these practices allowed the Company to report high sales and profitability figures
  • channel stuffing was never acknowledged by defendants during the Class Period.
  • Second, to prevent the market from discovering this channel stuffing, defendants began
  • The market, including numerous securities analysts closely following the Company, bought
  • Defendant Mason sold over $3,700,000 of his own Compaq shareholdings at artificially inflated
  • Defendant John T. Rose was elected Senior Vice President of Enterprise Computing Group for
  • As officers, directors and/or controlling persons of a company that is and, at all relevant sults of Compaq, so that the market price of the Company's publicly traded securities would be
  • The first phase of the ODM was Compaq's Build-to-Order concept, pursuant to which Compaq
  • "I think most of our channel partners would like that," said Earl Mason, Compaq's chief

  • 2 . LEAD DOCKET

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    ENTRY
    JUDGE VANESSA
    APPOINTMENT
    CONSOLIDATE
    COUNSEL
    DEFENDANT
    LEAD PLTFS
    GILMORE
    COMPAQ COMPUTER
    MOTION DOCKET
    CO-LEAD COUNSEL
    HARVEY GREENFIELD
    SCHROEDER
    SCHEDULING
    COMPLAINT
    ORDER GRANTING
    MARK BERGER
    JOHN
    CIVIL ACTION
    DEFTS
    RESPONSE
    EDIT
    DISMISS
    JUDGE LEE
    SECURITIES
    LAW
    HALDENSTEIN ADLER
    WOLF HALDENSTEIN
    MIW
    
    Docket as of June 21, 1999 (retrieved 6/29/99)
    
    Proceedings include all events.
    4:98cv1148 Berger, et al v. Compaq Computer Corp, et al           LEAD
    
                                                                LEAD
                           U.S. District Court
               TXS - Southern District of Texas (Houston)
    
                   CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 98-CV-1148
    
    Berger, et al v. Compaq Computer Corp, et al                Filed: 04/16/98
    Assigned to: Judge Vanessa D Gilmore         Jury demand: Plaintiff
    Demand: $0,000                               Nature of Suit:  850
    Lead Docket: None                            Jurisdiction: Federal Question
    Dkt# in other court: None
    
    Cause: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act
    
    
    MARK BERGER, on behalf of         Thomas E Bilek
    himsel and all others             713-227-9404 fax
    similarly situated                (COR LD NTC)
         plaintiff                    Hoeffner Bilek & Eidman
                                      440 Louisiana
                                      Ste 720
                                      Houston, TX 77002-1634
                                      713-227-7720
    
                                      Mel E Lifshitz
                                      (COR LD NTC)
                                      Bernstein Liebhard & Lifshitz
                                      10 E 40th St
                                      New York, NY 10016
                                      212-779-1414
    
                                      Stanley Bernstein
                                      (COR LD NTC)
                                      Sandy A Liebhard
                                      (COR LD NTC)
                                      Bernstein Liebhard et al
                                      10 E 40th St
                                      New York, NY 10016
                                      212-779-1414
    
    
    STEPHEN B SCHROEDER               Harvey Greenfield
         plaintiff                    212-949-0049 fax
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • Cause: 15:78mSecurities Exchange Act
  • JOHN W WHITE
  • conference for 8:30 9/25/98 before Judge Lee H. Rosenthal
  • Rosenthal) (Entry date 04/20/98)
  • Deadlines in scheduling orders
  • 4/27/98 -- CASE reassigned to Judge Vanessa D. Gilmore
  • for Summary Judgment and Analogous Motions to Dismiss,
  • 6/16/98 6 MOTION for appointment of lead pltfs,
  • consolidate cases with 98cv1816 by Proposed Liaison Cou,
  • Motion Docket Date 7/6/98 motion,
  • proposed lead pltfs selection of counsel,
  • appointments by Stephen B Schroeder, Motion Docket Date
  • 9/9/98 10 JOINT DISCOVERY/Case Management Plan by Mark Berger,
  • 9/10/98 11 ORDER granting Compaq Computer Corp. motion for Frank
  • 9/16/98 12 MOTION for Harvey Greenfield to appear pro hac vice by
  • co-lead counsel, and motion for entry of order
  • (Edit date 09/21/98)
  • Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz to Appointment as Co-Lead
  • 10/19/98 17 DECLARATION of Harvey Greenfield In Response To Opposition
  • Of Wolf Haldenstein,
  • Civil Action No. H-98-1901 shall be consolidated
  • complaint on counsel for defts.
  • The law firms of Wolf Haldenstein Adler
  • Support of Defts Motion to Dismiss by Compaq Computer Corp
  •    |