LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

IN RE CHEYENNE SOFTWARE INC SECURITIES LITIGATION Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: CSI105871, CourtName: CLASS ACTION CASES, UniqueCaseRef: LCD>CSI105871, Common Stock, Cheyenne Common Stock, Securities, Shares, Sold, Market, Distributors, Revenue, Gaap, Feed False, Conduit, Securities Analysts, Guidance, Omit, Scheme, Common Course, Class Action, Levine Sold, Shareholders, Oxenhorn Sold, Paid, Pret, Common Law, Market Forces , ContentID: 120249557

Case Documents
1 1995-03-03 CONSOLIDATED AMENDED COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 121994
50 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 1 document , 50 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . CONSOLIDATED AMENDED COMPLAINT

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
CHEYENNE COMMON STOCK
SECURITIES
SHARES
SOLD
MARKET
DISTRIBUTORS
REVENUE
GAAP
FEED FALSE
CONDUIT
SECURITIES ANALYSTS
GUIDANCE
OMIT
SCHEME
COMMON COURSE
CLASS ACTION
LEVINE SOLD
SHAREHOLDERS
OXENHORN SOLD
PAID
PRET
COMMON LAW
MARKET FORCES
                                          --,.





                                           UNITED  STATES  DISTRICT                                
                                           EASTERN  DISTRICT                          OF  NEW  YORK



 In  re  CHEYENNE  SOFTWARE,  INC.                                       )  CLASS  ACTION
,SECURITIES                 LITIGATION
                                                                                  Master        
                                                                                  CONSOLIDATED 
       i!
This  Document                  Relates            to  All                        CLASS  ACTION 
Actions                                                                  i                         
                                                                                                   

                                                                         ;

                                                                         ,' )

            Plaintiffs,                 by  their        undersigned                         
Cb;nsolidated                 Amended  Class  Action                               Complaint       
gainst

defendants,                  allege        upon  information                           and  belief 
                                                                                                   
investigation                   of  counsel,             except                   as  to  the 
pertain            to  the  named  plaintiffs                               and  their             

                                                   SUMMARY  OF  THE  ACTION
            1.       This  is  a  class                  action                   brought          
who,purchased                   the  common  stock                   of  Cheyenne                  

 ("Cheyenne"                 or  the  "Company")                    during              the  period
 1994
through            June  17,  1994  (the  "Class                                   Period").       
computer            software             company.              Prior               to  the 
Class  Period,                  Cheyenne            was  reported                     to  be  one 
profitable             publicly               traded       companies,                        with  

margins            in  the  software                  industry,                    and  reported   
th            in



SNIPPETS:
  • market forces.
  • common law.
  • Cheyenne common stock on March 25, 1994 at $41 per share (preT.
  • Company under which he is now paid $150,000 per year and receives
  • .Oxenhorn sold 97,000 shares of the Company's common stock for
  • Shareholders.
  • Levine sold 149,500 shares of the Company's common stock for
  • a class action.
  • in a common course of conduct and scheme to omit and/or
  • CHEYENNE'S GUIDANCE TO SECURITIES ANALYSTS
  • AND USE OF THEM AS A CONDUIT TO FEED FALSE
  • from Cheyenne and under GAAP no revenue should have been
  • the distributors.
  •    |