LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CLASS ACTION LITIGATION Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: CECAL209866, CourtName: CLASS ACTION CASES, State: OK Oklahoma, UniqueCaseRef: LCD>CECAL209866, Chesapeake, Securities, Common Stock, Act, Reports, Class Action, Louisiana Trend, Drilling, Price, Facts, Louisiana Austin Chalk, Austin Chalk, Individual Defendants, Class Period, Stock, Texas, Production, Reserves, Oil, Chesapeake Energy Corporation, Wilson, Rowland, Violation, Material Facts, Successful, Austin Chalk Trend, Allegations, Securities Exchange, Masters Creek, Louisiana Trend Project, United States, Corporate Officers, Exchange Act, Gas Exploration Operations, Success Rate , ContentID: 120249556

Case Documents
1 1997-09-09 COMPLAINT B
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 121993
27 pages
TXT
2 1997-08-29 COMPLAINT A
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 121992
27 pages
TXT
Total Documents: 2 documents , 54 pages
Price: $ 24.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . COMPLAINT B

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
DEFENDANTS
PLAINTIFF
LOUISIANA TREND
ACT
FACTS
SECURITIES
STOCK
CLASS ACTION
REPORTS
DRILLING
RESERVES
INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS
OIL
PRICE
VIOLATION
CLASS PERIOD
ALLEGATIONS
SECURITIES EXCHANGE
PRODUCTION
COMMON STOCK
LOUISIANA TREND PROJECT
CORPORATE OFFICERS
GAS EXPLORATION OPERATIONS
INTERNAL CORPORATE DOCUMENTS
AUSTIN CHALK
MATERIAL FACTS
SUCCESSFUL
PUBLIC FILINGS
CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATION

                        UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                        WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA




   _____________________________________

   JEFF LEZAK, on behalf of himself
   and all others similarly situated,

                         Plaintiff,

   CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATION,
   AUBREY K. McCLENDON, THOMAS L.
   WARD, MARCUS C. ROWLAND,
   SHANNON T. SELF, WALTER C.
   WILSON, HENRY J. HOOD,
   STEVEN C. DIXON, and J. MARK
   LESTER,

                         Defendants.
   _____________________________________

   )
   )
   )
   )
   )
   )
   )
   )
   )
   )
   )
   )
   )
   )
   )
   )

   No. CIV-97 1448 R
   (filed Sep. 9, 1997)

   CLASS ACTION

   COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATION
SNIPPETS:
  • COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATION OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
  • PLAINTIFF DEMANDS A TRIAL BY JURY
  • The allegations made in this complaint are based on information and belief, except those
  • Plaintiff's information and belief is based, inter alia, on the investigation made by and
  • This is a class action on behalf of purchasers of the common stock of Chesapeake Energy
  • Chesapeake is an oil and gas exploration and drilling company.
  • Throughout the Class Period, the Company told investors, securities analysts, and the
  • The foregoing was expected to lead to reduced production and revenue growth in those years.
  • The jurisdiction of this Court is founded upon Section 27 of the Securities Exchange Act of
  • Because of defendant McClendon's positions with the Company, he knew, or, in the absence of loyees, attendance at management and Board of Directors' meetings and committees thereof, and via
  • The Individual Defendants, as officers and/or directors of Chesapeake had a duty, because of
  • The Individual Defendants controlled, and could falsify the dissemination of the information
  • maintaining Chesapeake's high stock price and the illusion of successful oil and gas
  • whether the defendants acted willfully or recklessly in omitting to state and/or
  • Using this strategy, the Company, in its own words, "has rapidly expanded its reserves and
  • Because of our advanced geological understanding of the Austin Chalk and our entrepreneurial

  • 2 . COMPLAINT A

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    DEFENDANTS
    COMMON STOCK
    PLAINTIFF
    SECURITIES
    REPORTS
    LOUISIANA AUSTIN CHALK
    ACT
    CLASS ACTION
    AUSTIN CHALK
    TEXAS
    PRICE
    WILSON
    ROWLAND
    MEMBERS
    DRILLING
    AUSTIN CHALK TREND
    INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS
    CLASS PERIOD
    CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATION
    PRODUCTION
    MASTERS CREEK
    UNITED STATES
    EXCHANGE ACT
    MATERIAL FACTS
    SUCCESS RATE
    MISLEADING STATEMENTS
    NATURAL GAS
    SUCCESSFUL
    OFFERING DOCUMENTS
    
    
                          IN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                             SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
                                  HOUSTON DIVISION
    
    
       ALBION FINANCIAL LLC,
       on behalf of itself and
       all others similarly situated,
    
                             Plaintiff,
    
                  vs.
    
       CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATION,
       AUBREY K. McCLENDON,
       MARCUS C. ROWLAND,
       SHANNON T. SELF, and WALTER
       WILSON,
    
                             Defendants.
    
       )
       )
       )
       )
       )
       )
       )
       )
       )
       )
       )
       )
       )
       )
       )
    
       CIVIL ACTION NO.
       H 97-2960
       (filed Aug. 29, 1997)
    
                               CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
    
       Plaintiff, as and for plaintiff's complaint, alleges the following
       upon plaintiff's knowledge as to plaintiff's own acts, and upon
       information and belief as to all other matters. Plaintiff's
       information and belief are based, inter alia, on the investigation
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • Plaintiff, as and for plaintiff's complaint, alleges the following upon plaintiff's knowledge
  • Plaintiff's information and belief are based, inter alia, on the investigation conducted by
  • This is a class action,
  • of a class of the securities, including the common stock, of Chesapeake between April 2, 1997
  • Defendant Chesapeake is an independent oil and natural gas producer which specializes in
  • The individual defendants are directors and/or officers of Chesapeake.
  • Prior to the Class Period, Chesapeake aggressively touted the potential reserves of the
  • defendants falsely represented that the Company expected to operate successfully in the
  • Moreover, the defendants reported that Chesapeake had experienced an 84% drilling success
  • As a result of the defendants material misrepresentations and omissions as alleged herein,
  • Rather than disclose that drilling results in the outer Masters Creek area had been
  • This Court has jurisdiction of this litigation under Section 27 of the Securities Exchange
  • The Company's operations are focused on exploratory and developmental drilling in major
  • During the Class Period, while the price of Chesapeake common stock was artificially inflated
  • The members of the Class are so numerous that the joinder of all members is impractical.
  • releases and/or statements disseminated to the investing public and Chesapeake shareholders
  • the Company expands its reserves and production through the acquisition and subsequent
  • In conjunction with the Exchange Offer, Chesapeake issued a Prospectus and Registration
  • On April 2, 1997, Chesapeake issued a press release^1 announcing the successful completion of
  •    |