LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

UNITED STATES v JEFFERSON COUNTY Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: USVJC173199, CourtName: US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Plaintiff: UNITED STATES, State: AL Alabama, UniqueCaseRef: LCD>USVJC173199, City, Wilks, Appeals, District Court, Ensley Branch, United States, Birmingham, Selection Procedures, Naacp, Jefferson County, Decrees, Parties, Seibels, Wilks Plaintiffs-intervenors, Disparate Impact, Discrimination, Consent Decrees, Certificate, Applicants, Employee Selection, Fire Fighters, Validation Studies, Vii, Employment, Selection Devices, Adverse Impact, Jurisdiction, Fitzpatrick, Lawful Selection Procedures , ContentID: 120249340

Case Documents
1   APPELLANT BRIEF
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 121408
30 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 1 document , 30 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . APPELLANT BRIEF

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
CITY
WILKS
APPEALS
DISTRICT COURT
ENSLEY BRANCH
UNITED STATES
BIRMINGHAM
SELECTION PROCEDURES
NAACP
JEFFERSON COUNTY
DECREES
PARTIES
SEIBELS
WILKS PLAINTIFFS-INTERVENORS
DISPARATE IMPACT
DISCRIMINATION
CONSENT DECREES
CERTIFICATE
APPLICANTS
EMPLOYEE SELECTION
FIRE FIGHTERS
VALIDATION STUDIES
VII
EMPLOYMENT
SELECTION DEVICES
ADVERSE IMPACT
JURISDICTION
FITZPATRICK
LAWFUL SELECTION PROCEDURES
                              No. 01-10544-II
_______________________________________________________________
                IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

                     ENSLEY BRANCH,  NAACP, et al.,
                                             Plaintiffs-Appellees
                                      v.

                         GEORGE SEIBELS, et al.,
                                             Defendants-Appellees.
                         JOHN W. MARTIN, et al.,
                                             Plaintiffs-Appellees
                                       v.
                       CITY OF BIRMINGHAM, et al.,
                                            Defendants-Appellees.
                      UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                             Plaintiffs-Appellees,
                         ROBERT K. WILKS, et al.,
                                             Plaintiffs-Intervenors-Appellants
                                       v.
                        JEFFERSON COUNTY, et al.,
                                             Defendants-Appellees.

             APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
               FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

                BRIEF FOR THE UNITED STATES AS APPELLEE

                                   WILLIAM R. YEOMANS
                                     Acting Assistant Attorney General
                                   DENNIS J. DIMSEY
                                   REBECCA K. TROTH
                                     Attorneys
                                     Department of Justice
                                     P.O. Box 66078
                                       Washington, D.C.  20035-6078
                                     (202) 514-4541
_______________________________________________________________






                         Ensley Branch, NAACP v. Seibels, et al.
                                      01-10544-II
               CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES AND
                  CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
  • ROBERT K. WILKS, et al.,
  • APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
  • Ensley Branch, NAACP v. Seibels, et al.
  • following persons and parties have an interest in the outcome of this case:
  • Birmingham Fire Fighters Association, IAFF Local 117
  • City of Birmingham, Alabama
  • Fitzpatrick, Cooper & Clark, L.L.P.
  • Jefferson County, Alabama
  • THIS COURT HAS NO JURISDICTION BECAUSE
  • THE DISTRICT COURT DID NOT ABUSE ITS DISCRETION
  • Across-The-Board Validation Studies Absent Evidence
  • Of Disparate Impact
  • The City's Selection Procedures Are Discriminatory
  • CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE
  • In re Birmingham Reverse Discrimination Employment Litig.,
  • Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title VII,
  • This is a long-standing employment discrimination case that the Ensley
  • consent decrees resolving all claims were entered in 1981.
  • employee selection procedures, the district court entered modified consent decrees in
  • Wilks plaintiffs-intervenors filed a motion for additional relief,
  • would continue to provide a sufficient pool of qualified applicants.
  • requirement that defendants develop lawful selection procedures.
  • selection devices.
  • those positions for which no adverse impact has been found (Doc.
  •    |