LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

UNITED STATES v GLENDALE POLICE DEPARTMENT, GLENDALE, AZ Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: USVGPDGA275428, CourtName: US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Plaintiff: UNITED STATES, State: AZ Arizona, UniqueCaseRef: LCD>USVGPDGA275428, Officer, Qualified Interpreter, Police, Police Department, Communication, Agreement, Arrestee, Hearing Impairment, Interrogation, Request, Provision, Auxiliary Aids, Note Pad, Glendale Police, Justice, Ada, Deaf, Victim, Interview, Report, Supervisor, Scene, Critical Witness, Enforce, Parties, Primary Consideration, Violates, Necessity, Responses, Suspect , ContentID: 120249323

Case Documents
1   SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 121374
9 pages
TXT
Total Documents: 1 document , 9 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
QUALIFIED INTERPRETER
POLICE
POLICE DEPARTMENT
COMMUNICATION
AGREEMENT
ARRESTEE
HEARING IMPAIRMENT
INTERROGATION
REQUEST
PROVISION
AUXILIARY AIDS
NOTE PAD
GLENDALE POLICE
JUSTICE
ADA
DEAF
VICTIM
INTERVIEW
REPORT
SUPERVISOR
SCENE
CRITICAL WITNESS
ENFORCE
PARTIES
PRIMARY CONSIDERATION
VIOLATES
NECESSITY
RESPONSES
SUSPECT
                        SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN
                        THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
                                   AND
               GLENDALE POLICE DEPARTMENT, GLENDALE, ARIZONA
                  DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE COMPLAINT NUMBER
                                  XXXXX

     1. This matter was initiated by a complaint filed under
title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA"), 42
U.S.C.  12131-12134, and section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act
of 1973, as amended ("section 504") 29 U.S.C.  794, with the
United States Department of Justice ("Department of Justice")
against the City of Glendale Police Department ("Police
Department"). Allegedly, when the Glendale police officers
arrested an individual who was deaf and used sign language for
communication, he requested a sign language interpreter, but no
interpreter was provided.
     2. The Department of Justice is authorized under 28 C.F.R.
Part 35, Subpart F, to investigate fully the allegations of the
complaint in this matter to determine the Police Department's
compliance of the Police Department with title II of the ADA and
the Justice Department's implementing regulation, issue findings,
and, where appropriate, negotiate and secure voluntary compliance
agreements. Furthermore, the Attorney General is authorized
under 42 U.S.C.  12133, to bring a civil action enforcing title
II of the ADA should the Department of Justice fail to secure
voluntary compliance pursuant to Subpart F.
     3. The parties to this Settlement Agreement are the United
States of America and the Glendale Police Department. In
consideration of the terms of this Agreement as set forth below,
the Attorney General agrees to refrain from filing civil suit in
this matter. In the interest of securing compliance by voluntary
means, the parties have entered into this Agreement and agree to
the terms set forth below.
     4. By signing this Agreement, the Police Department does
not admit that the operation of its police services, policies, or
practices violates in any respect the ADA or its implementing
regulation.
     5. The ADA applies to the Police Department because it is a
public entity as defined in title II of the ADA and the title II
regulation. 42 U.S.C.  12115; and 28 C.F.R.  35.104. Section
504 applies to the Police Department because it is a recipient as
                              - 2 -
SNIPPETS:
  • GLENDALE POLICE DEPARTMENT, GLENDALE, ARIZONA
  • DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE COMPLAINT NUMBER
  • Allegedly, when the Glendale police officers arrested an individual who was deaf and used
  • The Department of Justice is authorized under 28 C.F.R. Part 35, Subpart F, to investigate
  • The parties to this Settlement Agreement are the United States of America and the Glendale
  • In the interest of securing compliance by voluntary means, the parties have entered into this
  • By signing this Agreement, the Police Department does not admit that the operation of its
  • The subject of this Settlement Agreement is the provision of qualified interpreting services
  • The Police Department agrees to furnish appropriate auxiliary aids and services when
  • In any situation involving an individual who is deaf or hard of hearing, the Police
  • The Police Department agrees to give primary consideration to the expressed choice of the
  • deadline or any other provision herein will not be construed as a waiver of its right to
  • Successful police contact with citizens is characterized by effective communication between
  • police officers encountering an individual with hearing impairment should use appropriate
  • In situations involving drivers who are deaf and use sign language for communication, the
  • These guidelines address only those situations where a police officer, after consulting with
  • Arrest Upon Probable Cause Without An Interview
  • a qualified interpreter may be required if an officer is unable to convey to the arrestee the
  • If the investigation does not involve a serious offense, the officer must postpone the
  • the officer must document his or her investigation as completely as possible and file the
  • If the investigation involves a serious offense, the officer, before leaving the scene, must
  • If an officer cannot effectively inform the arrestee of the Miranda warnings without the use
  • If an officer is able to communicate effectively by writing questions on a note pad and
  • However, if an investigating officer is unable to communicate effectively with a victim or
  •    |