LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

UNITED STATES v GHANASHYAMBHAI PATEL Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: USVGP185666, CourtName: US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Plaintiff: UNITED STATES, State: FL Florida, UniqueCaseRef: LCD>USVGP185666, Consent Order, Econo-lodge Motel, United States, Florida, Public Accommodations, America, Patel, Race, Discrimination, Act, Parties, Basis, Florida City, Civil Rights, African-american, Ghanashyambhai, Joyitshana, Econo Lodge, Employees, Motel Rooms, Accommodations, Injunction, Complaint, Alleged Violation, Nondiscriminatory Policies, Public Accommodation, Rights, Facilities, Compliance Tests, United States District, Joint Motion, Practice, Southern District, Equal Enjoyment, Refusing, Failing , ContentID: 120249320

Case Documents
1   COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 121369
3 pages
HTML
2 2000-10-18 CONSENT ORDER
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 121370
10 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 2 documents , 13 pages
Price: $ 24.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . COMPLAINT

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
AFRICAN-AMERICAN
ECONO-LODGE MOTEL
DEFENDANTS
ACCOMMODATIONS
UNITED STATES
PUBLIC ACCOMMODATION
PATEL
ATTORNEY
RIGHTS
FACILITIES
FLORIDA CITY
PRACTICE
BASIS
SOUTHERN DISTRICT
COURT
CIVIL RIGHTS
RACE
EQUAL ENJOYMENT
REFUSING
FAILING
AMERICA
GHANASHYAMBHAI
JOYITSHANA
ACT
PURSUANT
CHARGING AFRICAN-AMERICAN
PATTERN
SEQ
DENY
                        UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                        SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

   UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
        Plaintiff,

   v.

   Ghanashyambhai M. Patel and
   Joyitshana G. Patel, d/b/a
   Econo-Lodge Motel
        Defendants.

   ______________________________

                                 COMPLAINT

   The United States of America, by and through the undersigned United
   States Attorney, files this complaint and alleges:

    1. This action is brought by the Attorney General on behalf of the
       United States of America to enforce Title II of the Civil Rights
       Act of 1964 ("Public Accommodations Act"), 42 U.S.C. §2000a,
       pursuant to the provisions of 42 U.S.C. §2000a-5(a).
    2. This Court has jurisdiction of this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C.
       §2000a-6(a) and 28 U.S.C. §1345.
    3. The Defendants, Ghanashyambhai M. Patel and Joyitshana P. Patel,
       own and/or operate the Econo-Lodge Motel, located at 553 N.E. 1^st
       Avenue, Florida City, Florida, which is within the Southern
       District of Florida.
    4. The Defendants, Ghanashyambhai M. Patel and Joyitshana P. Patel
       reside within the Southern District of Florida.
    5. The Econo-Lodge is a business establishment that provides lodging
       facilities to transient guests for a fee.
    6. Econo-Lodge is a "place of public accommodation" within the
       meaning of 42 U.S.C. §2000a-(b)(1).
    7. The operations of the Econo-Lodge affect commerce within the
       meaning of 42 U.S.C. §2000a-(c)(1).
    8. The Defendants and their employees and/or agents, have implemented
       a policy and practice of denying African-American persons, on the
       basis of their race and color, the full and equal enjoyment of the
       facilities, services and accommodations of the Econo-Lodge Motel
       on the same basis as such facilities, services and accommodations
       are provided to white persons. This policy and practice has been
       implemented, among other ways, as follows:
         a. Assigning African-American persons to specifically designated
            rooms and/or areas of the motel because of their race and
            color;
SNIPPETS:
  • UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
  • SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
  • Ghanashyambhai M. Patel and Joyitshana G. Patel,
  • Econo-Lodge Motel
  • The United States of America, by and through the undersigned United States Attorney, files
  • This action is brought by the Attorney General on behalf of the United States of America to
  • Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §2000a, pursuant to the provisions of 42 U.S.C. §2000a-5.
  • The Defendants, Ghanashyambhai M. Patel and Joyitshana P. Patel, own and/or operate the
  • The Econo-Lodge is a business establishment that provides lodging facilities to transient
  • The Defendants and their employees and/or agents, have implemented a policy and practice of
  • This policy and practice has been implemented, among other ways, as follows:
  • Assigning African-American persons to specifically designated rooms and/or areas of the motel
  • Refusing to accommodate the preferences of African-American guests in the location and
  • The conduct of the Defendants, as described above in paragraph 8, constitutes a pattern or
  • This pattern or practice is of such a nature as to, and is intended to, deny the full
  • Failing or refusing to lease rooms at the Econo-Lodge Motel in Florida City, Florida, or any

  • 2 . CONSENT ORDER

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    CONSENT ORDER
    ECONO-LODGE MOTEL
    UNITED STATES
    PUBLIC ACCOMMODATIONS
    AMERICA
    FLORIDA
    COURT
    DISCRIMINATION
    PATEL
    PARTIES
    ACT
    RACE
    PLAINTIFF
    BASIS
    ECONO LODGE
    FLORIDA CITY
    CIVIL RIGHTS
    GHANASHYAMBHAI
    JOYITSHANA
    EMPLOYEES
    MOTEL ROOMS
    INJUNCTION
    COMPLAINT
    AFRICAN-AMERICAN
    ALLEGED VIOLATION
    NONDISCRIMINATORY POLICIES
    COMPLIANCE TESTS
    UNITED STATES DISTRICT
    JOINT MOTION
    
                        IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                        FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
    
       UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
            Plaintiff,
    
       v.
    
                                                             Case No. 00-3832
    
       Ghanashyambhai M. Patel and
       Joyitshana G. Patel, d/b/a
       Econo-Lodge Motel
            Defendant.
    
       ___________________________________
    
                                   CONSENT ORDER
    
       THIS MATTER came before the Court on the parties' Joint Motion to
       Enter Consent Order. The Court having reviewed the Motion and the file
       in this matter, and being otherwise duly advised in the premises
       thereof, finds as follows:
    
        I. INTRODUCTION
    
        1. On October 18, 2000, the Plaintiff, United States of America filed
           this action against the defendants, Ghanashyambhai M. Patel and
           Joyitshana G. Patel, the owners and/or operators of the Econo
           Lodge Motel, located at 553 N.E. 1^st Avenue, Florida City,
           Florida, pursuant to Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
           ("Public Accommodations Act"), 42 U.S.C. §2000a, seeking a
           permanent injunction against the defendants from engaging in a
           pattern or practice of discrimination on the basis of race in the
           operation of their business.
        2. The complaint alleges that the defendants engaged in a pattern or
           practice of denying African-Americans the full and equal enjoyment
           of rights secured to them under 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000a et. seq., in
           the operation of the Econo Lodge Motel. Specifically, the United
           States alleges that the Defendants and their employees and/or
           agents, have implemented a policy and practice of denying
           African-American persons, on the basis of their race and color,
           the full and equal enjoyment of the facilities, services and
           accommodations of the Econo-Lodge Motel on the same basis as such
           facilities, services and accommodations are provided to white
           persons. This policy and practice has been implemented, among
           other ways, as follows:
             a. Assigning African-American persons to specifically designated
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
  • FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
  • UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
  • Ghanashyambhai M. Patel and Joyitshana G. Patel,
  • THIS MATTER came before the Court on the parties' Joint Motion to Enter Consent Order.
  • On October 18, 2000, the Plaintiff, United States of America filed this action against the usiness.
  • The complaint alleges that the defendants engaged in a pattern or practice of denying
  • Specifically, the United States alleges that the Defendants and their employees and/or
  • Assigning African-American persons to specifically designated rooms and/or areas of the motel
  • Defendants deny all material allegations of the complaint, and specifically have denied that
  • The provisions of this Consent Order shall apply to the Defendants, their employees, agents,
  • This Consent Order addresses all conduct that the Plaintiffs allege occurred at the Econo
  • By entering into this Consent Order, Defendants do not admit to any violation of Title II of
  • INJUNCTION
  • Failing or refusing to take such affirmative steps as may be necessary to eliminate the
  • It is ORDERED that within thirty days of the entry of this Order, the defendants shall take
  • Prominently post in the lobby at the Econo-Lodge motel, and all other places of public
  • It is further ORDERED that the United States may request a local testing agency to conduct,
  • It is further ORDERED that the Plaintiff, United States of America, shall notify Defendants
  •    |