![]() |
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1
.
COMPLAINT
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
AFRICAN-AMERICAN ECONO-LODGE MOTEL DEFENDANTS ACCOMMODATIONS UNITED STATES PUBLIC ACCOMMODATION PATEL ATTORNEY RIGHTS FACILITIES FLORIDA CITY PRACTICE BASIS SOUTHERN DISTRICT COURT CIVIL RIGHTS RACE EQUAL ENJOYMENT REFUSING FAILING AMERICA GHANASHYAMBHAI JOYITSHANA ACT PURSUANT CHARGING AFRICAN-AMERICAN PATTERN SEQ DENY |
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
v.
Ghanashyambhai M. Patel and
Joyitshana G. Patel, d/b/a
Econo-Lodge Motel
Defendants.
______________________________
COMPLAINT
The United States of America, by and through the undersigned United
States Attorney, files this complaint and alleges:
1. This action is brought by the Attorney General on behalf of the
United States of America to enforce Title II of the Civil Rights
Act of 1964 ("Public Accommodations Act"), 42 U.S.C. §2000a,
pursuant to the provisions of 42 U.S.C. §2000a-5(a).
2. This Court has jurisdiction of this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C.
§2000a-6(a) and 28 U.S.C. §1345.
3. The Defendants, Ghanashyambhai M. Patel and Joyitshana P. Patel,
own and/or operate the Econo-Lodge Motel, located at 553 N.E. 1^st
Avenue, Florida City, Florida, which is within the Southern
District of Florida.
4. The Defendants, Ghanashyambhai M. Patel and Joyitshana P. Patel
reside within the Southern District of Florida.
5. The Econo-Lodge is a business establishment that provides lodging
facilities to transient guests for a fee.
6. Econo-Lodge is a "place of public accommodation" within the
meaning of 42 U.S.C. §2000a-(b)(1).
7. The operations of the Econo-Lodge affect commerce within the
meaning of 42 U.S.C. §2000a-(c)(1).
8. The Defendants and their employees and/or agents, have implemented
a policy and practice of denying African-American persons, on the
basis of their race and color, the full and equal enjoyment of the
facilities, services and accommodations of the Econo-Lodge Motel
on the same basis as such facilities, services and accommodations
are provided to white persons. This policy and practice has been
implemented, among other ways, as follows:
a. Assigning African-American persons to specifically designated
rooms and/or areas of the motel because of their race and
color;
SNIPPETS:
|
|
2
.
CONSENT ORDER
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
CONSENT ORDER ECONO-LODGE MOTEL UNITED STATES PUBLIC ACCOMMODATIONS AMERICA FLORIDA COURT DISCRIMINATION PATEL PARTIES ACT RACE PLAINTIFF BASIS ECONO LODGE FLORIDA CITY CIVIL RIGHTS GHANASHYAMBHAI JOYITSHANA EMPLOYEES MOTEL ROOMS INJUNCTION COMPLAINT AFRICAN-AMERICAN ALLEGED VIOLATION NONDISCRIMINATORY POLICIES COMPLIANCE TESTS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JOINT MOTION |
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 00-3832
Ghanashyambhai M. Patel and
Joyitshana G. Patel, d/b/a
Econo-Lodge Motel
Defendant.
___________________________________
CONSENT ORDER
THIS MATTER came before the Court on the parties' Joint Motion to
Enter Consent Order. The Court having reviewed the Motion and the file
in this matter, and being otherwise duly advised in the premises
thereof, finds as follows:
I. INTRODUCTION
1. On October 18, 2000, the Plaintiff, United States of America filed
this action against the defendants, Ghanashyambhai M. Patel and
Joyitshana G. Patel, the owners and/or operators of the Econo
Lodge Motel, located at 553 N.E. 1^st Avenue, Florida City,
Florida, pursuant to Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
("Public Accommodations Act"), 42 U.S.C. §2000a, seeking a
permanent injunction against the defendants from engaging in a
pattern or practice of discrimination on the basis of race in the
operation of their business.
2. The complaint alleges that the defendants engaged in a pattern or
practice of denying African-Americans the full and equal enjoyment
of rights secured to them under 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000a et. seq., in
the operation of the Econo Lodge Motel. Specifically, the United
States alleges that the Defendants and their employees and/or
agents, have implemented a policy and practice of denying
African-American persons, on the basis of their race and color,
the full and equal enjoyment of the facilities, services and
accommodations of the Econo-Lodge Motel on the same basis as such
facilities, services and accommodations are provided to white
persons. This policy and practice has been implemented, among
other ways, as follows:
a. Assigning African-American persons to specifically designated
SNIPPETS:
|
| | | |