LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

UNITED STATES v GESTON Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: USVG118495, CourtName: US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Plaintiff: UNITED STATES, State: CA California, UniqueCaseRef: LCD>USVG118495, Officer, United States, Plain Error, Testimony, Baton, District, Evidence, Geston, Ruling, Motion, Witnesses, Prosecutorial Misconduct, Cir, Hernandez, Appeals, Officer Garrett, Cross-examination, Government Counsel, Prejudice, Sentencing, Judicial Proceedings, Examination, Evidentiary Rulings, Erroneous Testimony, Incorrect Testimony, Petty Officer, Seriously Affect , ContentID: 120249319

Case Documents
1   APPELLANT BRIEF
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 121368
56 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 1 document , 56 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . APPELLANT BRIEF

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
UNITED STATES
COURT
PLAIN ERROR
TESTIMONY
BATON
DISTRICT
EVIDENCE
COUNSEL
GESTON
RULING
MOTION
WITNESSES
PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT
CIR
HERNANDEZ
APPEALS
OFFICER GARRETT
CROSS-EXAMINATION
GOVERNMENT COUNSEL
PREJUDICE
SENTENCING
JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
EXAMINATION
DEFENDANT
EVIDENTIARY RULINGS
ERRONEOUS TESTIMONY
INCORRECT TESTIMONY
PETTY OFFICER
SERIOUSLY AFFECT
                                      Nos. 01-50081, 01-50163

                  IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                   FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
                                          ________________

                              UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                                            Plaintiff-Appellee/
                                                                           Cross-Appellant

                                                           v.

                                          JACK A. GESTON,

                                                                             Defendant-Appellant/
                                                                           Cross-Appellee
                                     _____________________

             ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT
           COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
                                          ________________

                BRIEF FOR THE UNITED STATES AS APPELLEE
                                   AND CROSS-APPELLANT
                                          ________________


PATRICK K. O'TOOLE                                               RALPH F. BOYD, JR.
   United States Attorney                                          Assistant Attorney General

BRUCE R. CASTETTER                                               JESSICA DUNSAY SILVER
   Chief, Appellate Section                                      JENNIFER LEVIN
   Criminal Division                                               Attorneys
                                                                   Department of Justice
RANDY K. JONES                                                     P.O. Box 66078
  Assistant U.S. Attorney                                          Washington, D.C.  20035- 6078
                                                                   (202) 305-0025




                                       TABLE OF CONTENTS

                                                                                                   

STATEMENT OF JURISDICTION AND BAIL STATUS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1

STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
  • ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
  • Evidentiary Rulings
  • Defendant's Motion For New Trial Based
  • On Alleged Prosecutorial Misconduct
  • Sentencing
  • GOVERNMENT COUNSEL DID NOT KNOWINGLY
  • USE FALSE OR ERRONEOUS TESTIMONY OF
  • Given The Disputed Evidence On Officer
  • Incorrect Testimony
  • Review, At Best, To Plain Error
  • Argument On Garrett's Baton
  • Of The Judicial Proceedings
  • THE UNITED STATES' CROSS EXAMINATION OF WITNESSES WAS NOT PLAIN ERROR AND THERE IS NOT
  • Cross-Examination Of Officer Garrett
  • The Error, If Any, Did Not Seriously Affect The
  • THE DISTRICT COURT DID NOT ERR IN BARRING SPECIFIC EVIDENCE OF UNRELATED
  • GESTON CANNOT ACHIEVE ON CUMULATIVE
  • 763 F.2d 1036 (9th Cir.
  • United States v. Hernandez,
  •    |