LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

UNITED STATES v FLEET MORTGAGE CORP Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: USVFMC180597, CourtName: US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Plaintiff: UNITED STATES, State: NY New York, UniqueCaseRef: LCD>USVFMC180597, Loan, Mortgage, Borrowers, United States, Overages, Practices, Fleet, Settlement, Fmc, Act, Federal Reserve, Officers, Fair Housing, Prices, Underages, Discriminatory, Settlement Fund, Rights, Equal Credit Opportunity, Settlement Agreement, Fref, Discriminatory Policies, Civil, African-american, Hispanics, Price, Home Mortgage, Race, National Origin, District, York, Fleet Mortgage, Monitoring, Basis, Westbury, Woodbridge, Applicants, Home Mortgage Loans, Paid, Compensation , ContentID: 120249314

Case Documents
1 1993-08-01 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 121361
5 pages
HTML
2 1977-03-23 COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 121360
4 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 2 documents , 9 pages
Price: $ 24.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
SETTLEMENT
FMC
UNITED STATES
OVERAGES
MORTGAGE
BORROWERS
OFFICERS
PRICES
SETTLEMENT FUND
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
FREF
FEDERAL RESERVE
HOME MORTGAGE
DISTRICT
YORK
FLEET MORTGAGE
MONITORING
UNDERAGES
PAID
COMPENSATION
PRACTICES
ATTORNEY
COURT
LENDER
HOUSING
HIGHER PRICES
SHEET
PRICING
CIVIL RIGHTS
                    IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                    FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

   UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
        Plaintiff,

   v.

                                                               CV 96 2279

   FLEET MORTGAGE CORP.
        Defendant.

   __________________________________

                            SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

    I. INTRODUCTION
       The parties, acting by and through their counsel, jointly enter
       into and file this Settlement Agreement in order to fully and
       finally resolve the lawsuit filed contemporaneously herewith by
       the United States against Fleet Mortgage Corp. ("FMC" or the
       "lender") alleging violations of the Fair Housing Act, 42 U.S.C.
       §§ 3601-3619 and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, 15 U.S.C.
       1691-1691f, which allegations FMC denies.
         A. The Claims Made By The United States.
              1. The United States alleges that from August 1, 1993,
                 through June 30, 1994, FMC's predecessor, Fleet Real
                 Estate Funding Corp. ("FREF") engaged in discriminatory
                 treatment of African-American and Hispanic borrowers at
                 its branch offices in Woodbridge, New Jersey, and
                 Westbury, New York, by charging them higher prices in
                 the form of greater "overages" and fewer "underages" on
                 home mortgage loans than it charged white borrowers. An
                 overage occurs when a loan closes with higher points
                 than are required on the price sheet for the applicable
                 loan product or when a premium interest rate is obtained
                 and then retained by the lender. An underage occurs when
                 the loan officer obtains fewer points than the price
                 sheet baseline. These higher prices were not based on
                 differences in risk or other neutral factors such as
                 local market conditions.
              2. During the period in question, overages were used by
                 FREF to allow regional branches to adjust loan prices to
                 local market conditions and as an incentive to loan
                 officers to originate more profitable loans. FREF
                 furnished its branches with daily, national price sheets
                 that established baseline prices (in the form of
SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
  • FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
  • FLEET MORTGAGE CORP. Defendant.
  • The parties, acting by and through their counsel, jointly enter into and file this Settlement
  • home mortgage loans than it charged white borrowers.
  • loan product or when a premium interest rate is obtained
  • and then retained by the lender.
  • sheet baseline.
  • These higher prices were not based on
  • During the period in question, overages were used by
  • FREF to allow regional branches to adjust loan prices to
  • officers to originate more profitable loans.
  • In 1994 and 1995 the staff of the Federal Reserve Bank
  • in the frequency of overages and underages as to certain
  • The Defense Asserted By Fleet FMC has undertaken its own statistical analysis of its overages
  • While the overall variances in loan pricing at the two branches during the period in question
  • Monitoring FMC has developed a monitoring and compliance system to ensure uniform application
  • The primary purpose of the Settlement Fund is to compensate those African-American and
  • There will be only one compensation amount per loan.
  • DEVAL L. PATRICK ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL
  • Civil Rights Division

  • 2 . COMPLAINT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    FLEET
    ACT
    PRACTICES
    MORTGAGE
    BORROWERS
    DEFENDANT
    FAIR HOUSING
    DISCRIMINATORY
    UNITED STATES
    RIGHTS
    EQUAL CREDIT OPPORTUNITY
    DISCRIMINATORY POLICIES
    CIVIL
    AFRICAN-AMERICAN
    HISPANICS
    PRICE
    RACE
    NATIONAL ORIGIN
    BASIS
    WESTBURY
    WOODBRIDGE
    APPLICANTS
    HOME MORTGAGE LOANS
    OVERAGES
    COURT
    BUSINESS
    FEDERAL RESERVE
    UNDERAGES
    SIMILARLY SITUATED WHITE
    
                        IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                        FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
    
       UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
            Plaintiff,
    
       v.
    
                                                                   CV 96 2279
    
       FLEET MORTGAGE CORP.
            Defendant.
    
       ________________________________
    
                                     COMPLAINT
    
       The United States of America alleges:
    
        1. The United States brings this action to enforce the provisions of
           Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968 ("Fair Housing Act"),
           as amended by the Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988, 42 U.S.C.
           §§ 3601-3619, and of the Equal Credit Opportunity Act ("ECOA"), 15
           U.S.C. §§ 1691-1691f.
        2. This court has jurisdiction of this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
           1345, 42 U.S.C. § 3614, and 15 U.S.C. § 1691(h) and venue is
           appropriate pursuant to 28 U.S.C § 1391(c) and 1392(a).
        3. Defendant, Fleet Mortgage Corp., is incorporated under the laws of
           the State of South Carolina, with its principal place of business
           in Columbia, South Carolina. Fleet Mortgage Corp. (hereinafter
           "Fleet" or "the lender") is the successor to Fleet Real Estate
           Funding Corporation, the name under which the defendant did
           business during the occurrence of the events described in this
           Complaint. Fleet is a subsidiary of Fleet Mortgage Group, Inc.,
           which is in turn a subsidiary of Fleet Financial Group, Inc., with
           its principal place of business in Providence, Rhode Island. Fleet
           Financial Group, Inc., is a bank holding company, making it and
           all of its subsidiaries subject to the regulatory supervision of
           the Federal Reserve Board.
        4. Fleet's business includes engaging in residential real
           estate-related transactions and regularly extending credit to
           persons. Fleet is a creditor as that term is defined by section
           702(e) of the ECOA, 15 U.S.C. § 1692a(e), and is, therefore,
           subject to the requirements of the ECOA and its implementing
           Regulation B, as amended, 12 C.F.R. Part 202, in effect on or
           after March 23, 1977.
        5. Fleet is organized on a regional basis. Its Mid-Atlantic Region
           includes branch offices in Westbury, New York, and in Woodbridge,
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
  • FLEET MORTGAGE CORP. Defendant.
  • The United States brings this action to enforce the provisions of Title VIII of the Civil
  • Fleet Mortgage Corp. is the successor to Fleet Real Estate Funding Corporation, the name
  • Fleet Financial Group, Inc., is a bank holding company, making it and all of its subsidiaries
  • During the time period that is the subject of this Complaint, these two branch offices had a
  • Fleet uses the price sheets and related information to inform its loan officers of both the
  • During the time period described in the preceding paragraph, loan officers at Fleet's
  • In 1994, the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston conducted an investigation of the lending
  • Based on information gathered in its investigation, the Federal Reserve determined that in
  • The defendant and its employees in the Westbury and Woodbridge branches failed to implement
  • Beginning at the latest on January 1, 1993, and continuing until at least June 30, 1994,
  • Fleet has subjected African-American and Hispanic customers of its Westbury and Woodbridge
  • Persons who have been victims of Fleet's discriminatory policies and practices are aggrieved
  • The discriminatory policies and practices of the defendant were intentional and willful, and
  •    |