LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

UNITED STATES v FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF VICKSBURG Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: USVFNBOV246942, CourtName: US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Plaintiff: UNITED STATES, State: MS Mississippi, UniqueCaseRef: LCD>USVFNBOV246942, Bank, Home Improvement Loans, United States, Consent Decree, Credit Opportunity Act, Equal Credit Opportunity, Unsecured Home Improvement, Customers, Vicksburg, District, First National Bank, Fair Housing Act, Discrimination, Civil Rights, Race, Black Customers, Loans, Mississippi, Act, White Customers, Violations, Paragraph, Single Payment, Senior Loan Officer, Deputy Comptroller, Complaint, Hereinafter, District Administrator, Home Improvement, Compensation Fund, Rights, Fair Housing , ContentID: 120249313

Case Documents
1 1993-07 CONSENT DECREE
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 121359
16 pages
HTML
2 1993-06 COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 121358
4 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 2 documents , 20 pages
Price: $ 24.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . CONSENT DECREE

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
HOME IMPROVEMENT LOANS
UNITED STATES
CONSENT DECREE
CREDIT OPPORTUNITY ACT
EQUAL CREDIT OPPORTUNITY
CUSTOMERS
VICKSBURG
DISTRICT
FIRST NATIONAL BANK
FAIR HOUSING ACT
UNSECURED HOME IMPROVEMENT
DISCRIMINATION
RACE
CIVIL RIGHTS
BLACK CUSTOMERS
VIOLATIONS
MISSISSIPPI
WHITE CUSTOMERS
SENIOR LOAN OFFICER
DEPUTY COMPTROLLER
COMPLAINT
HEREINAFTER
PARAGRAPH
DISTRICT ADMINISTRATOR
COMPENSATION FUND
SINGLE PAYMENT
EMPLOYEES
LOAN POLICY
PROPOSED LOAN POLICY
                    IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                  FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
                              JACKSON DIVISION

   UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
   Plaintiff,

   v.

   FIRST NATIONAL BANK
   OF VICKSBURG,
   Defendant.

   ______________________________

                               CONSENT DECREE

   The United States files this Consent Decree simultaneously with its
   Complaint against the First National Bank of Vicksburg (hereinafter
   "Bank") alleging violations of the Fair Housing Act (Title VIII of the
   Civil Rights Act of 1968, as amended by the Fair Housing Amendments
   Act of 1988), 42 U.S.C. {{ 3601-3619; and the Equal Credit Opportunity
   Act, 15 U.S.C. {{ 1691-1691f. The Complaint alleges that the Bank has
   engaged in policies and practices that discriminated on the basis of
   race in the extension of unsecured home improvement loans by
   subjecting its black customers to terms and conditions for unsecured
   home improvement loans that resulted in their paying more for their
   loans than similarly situated white customers.

   The Bank neither admits nor denies all of the allegations in the
   Complaint and states that it has never discriminated on the basis of
   race in its unsecured home improvement loan business.

   More specifically, the United States alleges that the Bank has for a
   number of years offered unsecured home improvement loans which were
   either single payment loans, to be paid in full at maturity, or
   amortized, with monthly payments due during the loan term. Interest on
   single payment loans was calculated by the simple interest method
   while the interest on amortized loans was calculated, until July 1993,
   either as simple interest or add-on interest. The add-on interest
   method resulted in a significantly higher annual percentage rate than
   simple interest. The United States alleges that nearly all of the
   Bank's black customers for unsecured home improvement loans were
   treated in a disparate fashion with respect to repayment terms and
   interest rates. An investigation by the Comptroller of the Currency
   showed that during calendar year 1992, 97% (59 of 61) of the Bank's
   black customers for unsecured home improvement loans received
   amortized loans, while 49% (62 of 126) of the Bank's white customers
SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
  • FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
  • FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF VICKSBURG,
  • The United States files this Consent Decree simultaneously with its Complaint against the
  • The Complaint alleges that the Bank has engaged in policies and practices that discriminated
  • More specifically, the United States alleges that the Bank has for a number of years offered
  • The parties have also agreed that there should be no evidentiary hearing, trial or other
  • The Bank, its officials, employees, and agents, as well as successors as specified in
  • If, within thirty days after receipt of the proposed loan policy described above, counsel for
  • Within thirty days of the approval of the proposed loan policy by the District Administrator
  • Prior to the final decision whether to extend or reject an application for any home
  • The senior loan officer shall also certify, by signature, that any proposed home improvement
  • liability for violations of the Fair Housing Act,
  • policies regarding illegal discrimination, including the
  • Within ninety days after execution of this Consent Decree, the Bank shall submit to counsel
  • Dollars into a trust account entitled "First National Bank of Vicksburg Compensation Fund
  • Compliance Department First National Bank of Vicksburg Post Office Box 39 Vicksburg,
  • Civil Rights Division

  • 2 . COMPLAINT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    ACT
    EQUAL CREDIT OPPORTUNITY
    UNSECURED HOME IMPROVEMENT
    HOME IMPROVEMENT
    UNITED STATES
    RIGHTS
    FAIR HOUSING
    PRACTICES
    DEFENDANT
    BLACK CUSTOMERS
    CIVIL RIGHTS
    DISCRIMINATORY
    POLICIES
    SINGLE PAYMENT
    ADD-ON
    MISSISSIPPI
    NATIONAL BANK
    REAL ESTATE-RELATED TRANSACTIONS
    COMPTROLLER
    COURT
    VIII
    FAIR HOUSING AMENDMENTS
    LENDING
    BORROWERS
    PARAGRAPH
    RACE
    WHITE CUSTOMERS
    APPLICANTS
    ATTORNEY
    
                        IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                      FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
                                  JACKSON DIVISION
    
       UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
       Plaintiff,
    
       v.
    
       FIRST NATIONAL BANK
       OF VICKSBURG,
       Defendant.
    
       ______________________________
    
                                     COMPLAINT
    
       The United States of America alleges:
    
        1. This action is brought by the United States to enforce the
           provisions of Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968 (the Fair
           Housing Act), as amended by the Fair Housing Amendments Act of
           1988, 42 U.S.C. §§3601-3619, and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act,
           15 U.S.C. §§1691-1691f.
        2. This Court has jurisdiction of this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
           §1345, 42 U.S.C. §3614, and 15 U.S.C. §1691(h).
        3. Defendant, First National Bank of Vicksburg (hereinafter "First
           National"), is a national bank doing business in the State of
           Mississippi. First National is a subsidiary of First National
           Corporation incorporated in the State of Mississippi. Its
           principal place of business is at 1301 Washington Street,
           Vicksburg, Mississippi 39180. Its business includes engaging in
           residential real estate-related transactions and regularly
           extending credit to persons.
        4. As of June 1993, First National had approximately $238,514,000 in
           deposits, assets of $276,652,000, equity capital of $28,958,000,
           and 8 branch offices.
        5. As a national bank, First National is subject to the regulatory
           authority of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. As a
           federally regulated lending institution, First National is subject
           to federal laws governing fair lending, including the Fair Housing
           Act and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act.
        6. Since at least 1985, First National has offered and extended
           unsecured loans to individuals for the purpose of "improving,
           repairing or maintaining a dwelling" as defined by 42 U.S.C.
           3602(b) and 3605(b)(1)(A). (Hereinafter referred to as "unsecured,
           home improvement loans.") The unsecured home improvement loans
           offered by First National were either single payment loans, which
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
  • This action is brought by the United States to enforce the provisions of Title VIII of the
  • Defendant, First National Bank of Vicksburg, is a national bank doing business in the State
  • Its business includes engaging in residential real estate-related transactions and regularly
  • As a federally regulated lending institution, First National is subject to federal laws
  • home improvement loans.")
  • The unsecured home improvement loans offered by First National were either single payment
  • the interest on amortized loans was calculated either as simple interest or add-on interest.
  • Based on the bank's 1992 rates sheets, borrowers with add-on interest were assessed rates as
  • the bank discontinued using the add-on interest method for these loans in response to a fair
  • the Comptroller of the Currency conducted an investigation of the lending practices of First
  • Based on information gathered in its investigation, the Comptroller determined that he had
  • During calendar year 1992, 97% of First National's black customers for unsecured home
  • Defendant First National's policies and practices, as described in paragraphs 6 through 12,
  • Persons who have been victims of Defendant's discriminatory policies and practices as
  • Acting Assistant Attorney General Civil Rights Division
  •    |