![]() |
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1
.
CONSENT DECREE
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
DECREE EMPLOYMENT ECCF OFFICERS UNITED STATES INMATES CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS CONSENT DECREE ERIE COUNTY COMPLAINTS COURT GENDER VII CHARGES DISCRIMINATION YORK JUSTICE TRIP FEMALE PARTIES BASIS ESCORT MALE RESOLVE EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION VIOLATION ENTRY TRANSPORT |
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff
v
ERIE COUNTY, NEW YORK,
Defendant.
CONSENT DECREE
This action was brought by the United States against Erie County, New
York, ("Erie") to enforce the provisions of Title VII of the Civil
Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et seq. ("Title
VII"), following receipt by the Department of Justice from the Equal
Employment Opportunity Commission of charges filed by four
correctional officers employed at the Erie County Correctional
Facility ("ECCF").
The correctional officers -- one man and three women --alleged that
the ECCF improperly used gender as a basis for choosing correctional
officers to escort inmates on trips away from the ECCF. For example,
if a female prisoner was sent to the eye doctor, ECCF policy required
her to be escorted by at least one female correctional officer.
Similarly, all male inmates had to be escorted by at least one male
correctional officer, regardless of whether or not the inmate was
likely to need to undress during the trip.
In its complaint, the United States alleges that Erie, in the ECCF,
violated Title VII by assigning only men to guard male inmates and
only women to guard female inmates during trips outside the ECCF, when
such gender-based assignments were not reasonably necessary as bona
fide occupational qualifications.
The parties, desiring that this action be settled by appropriate
consent decree and without the burden of protracted litigation, agree
to the jurisdiction of this Court over the parties and the subject
matter of this action. Subject to the Court's approval of this Consent
Decree, the parties waive a hearing and findings of fact and
conclusions of law on all issues, and further agree to the entry of
this Decree as final and binding between themselves as to the issues
raised in the United States' complaint filed in this case and the
matters resolved in this Decree.
SNIPPETS:
|
|
2
.
COMPLAINT
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
DEFENDANT YORK CIVIL RIGHTS GUARDS ECCF EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATE PLAINTIFF VII SEX ATTORNEY CIVIL RIGHTS DIVISION WESTERN DISTRICT COURT ERIE COUNTY INMATES BASIS POLICIES PRACTICES JUSTICE ALLEGES CIVIL RIGHTS ACT MEANING EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES ASSIGNING CHARGES MATTER PLAINTIFF PRAYS RELIEF |
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
v.
ERIE COUNTY, NEW YORK
Defendant.
COMPLAINT
Plaintiff United States of America alleges that:
1. This action is brought by the United States to enforce the
provisions of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended,
42 U.S.C. §2000e, et seq., (hereinafter "Title VII").
2. This Court has jurisdiction over this action under 28 U.S.C. §1345
and 42 U.S.C. §2000e-5(f).
3. The defendant Erie County, New York, is a municipal corporation
established by laws of the State of New York.
4. The defendant, through its Erie County Correctional Facility
("ECCF"), employs guards to supervise inmates at the ECCF and assigns
duties to those guards.
5. The defendant is a person within the meaning of 42 U.S.C. §2000e(a)
and an employer within the meaning of 42 U.S.C. §2000e(b).
6. The defendant has discriminated against Niala Diebold, Roberta
Grachowski, Claudia Pustulka and Craig Duff ("complainants"), guards
at the ECCF, on the basis of their sex in violation of Title VII, by
pursuing policies and practices that discriminate against men and
women, deprive or tend to deprive men and women of employment
opportunities, and adversely affect the status of men and women as
employees because of their sex. The defendant has implemented these
policies and practices by assigning only men to guard male inmates and
only women to guard female inmates during trips outside the ECCF,
regardless of whether such gender-based assignments are reasonably
necessary as bona fide occupational qualifications.
6. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("EEOC") received
timely charges filed by the complainants, in which they alleged that
SNIPPETS:
|
| | | |