LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

UNITED STATES v EDWARD ROSE CONSTRUCTION CO Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: USVERCC227274, CourtName: US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Plaintiff: UNITED STATES, State: IN Indiana, UniqueCaseRef: LCD>USVERCC227274, Dwellings, Fair Housing, United States, Complexes, Construction, Fair Housing Act, Indiana, Apartment, Design, Discriminatory, Civil, Rights, Practices, Handicap, Violation, Compliance, Failing, Refusing, Damages, Northern District, America, Enforcement, Laws, Common, Passage, Premises, Wheelchairs , ContentID: 120249309

Case Documents
1 1991-03-13 COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 121352
4 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 4 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . COMPLAINT

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
DWELLINGS
FAIR HOUSING
UNITED STATES
COMPLEXES
CONSTRUCTION
FAIR HOUSING ACT
INDIANA
APARTMENT
DESIGN
DISCRIMINATORY
CIVIL
RIGHTS
PRACTICES
HANDICAP
ATTORNEY
VIOLATION
COMPLIANCE
FAILING
REFUSING
DAMAGES
NORTHERN DISTRICT
COURT
AMERICA
ENFORCEMENT
LAWS
COMMON
PASSAGE
PREMISES
WHEELCHAIRS
                IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
                        NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

   UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
        Plaintiff,

   v.

   EDWARD ROSE CONSTRUCTION CO.
   and OCCIDENTAL DEVELOPMENT
   CO,
        Defendants.

   ______________________________

                                 COMPLAINT

   The United States of America alleges:

    1. This action is brought by the United States to enforce the Fair
       Housing Act, Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968, as
       amended by the Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988 (Fair Housing
       Act), 42 U.S.C. §§ 3601-3619.
    2. This Court has jurisdiction over this action under 28 U.S.C.
       1345 and 42 U.S.C. § 3614(a).
    3. Defendant Edward Rose Construction Co. is a corporation organized
       under the laws of Michigan. Defendant Occidental Development Co.
       is also a corporation organized under the laws of Michigan. Each
       defendant is engaged in the construction and operation of rental
       apartment complexes in the Northern District of Indiana and
       elsewhere.
    4. Among the apartment complexes constructed and operated by the
       defendants are complexes known as Hurwich Farms, which is located
       in South Bend, Indiana; Indian Lakes, which is located in
       Mishawaka, Indiana; Waterfront Apartments, which is located in
       Virginia Beach, Virginia; and Oak Shores Apartments, which is
       located in Oak Creek, Wisconsin. These four garden-style apartment
       complexes are hereinafter referred to as "the subject complexes."
    5. Each of the subject complexes contains residential apartment units
       that are "dwellings" within the meaning of 42 U.S.C. § 3602(b).
    6. A substantial number of the units contained in Hurwich Farms, and
       all of the units contained in the other subject complexes, were
       designed and constructed for first occupancy after March 13, 1991.
       The ground floor units at each of the subject complexes are
       "covered multi-family dwellings" within the meaning of 42 U.S.C.
       3604(f)(7)(A) and are subject to the requirements of 42 U.S.C.
       3604(f)(3)(C).
    7. Defendants have failed to design and construct the dwelling units
SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
  • The United States of America alleges:
  • This action is brought by the United States to enforce the Fair Housing Act, Title VIII of
  • Defendant Edward Rose Construction Co. is a corporation organized under the laws of Michigan.
  • Each defendant is engaged in the construction and operation of rental apartment complexes in
  • Among the apartment complexes constructed and operated by the defendants are complexes known
  • Each of the subject complexes contains residential apartment units that are "dwellings"
  • Defendants have failed to design and construct the dwelling units and common use and public
  • all the doors designed to allow passage into and within all premises within such dwellings
  • Discriminated in the rental of, or otherwise made unavailable or denied, dwellings to persons
  • A pattern or practice of resistance to the full enjoyment of rights granted by the Fair
  • Persons who have been the victims of defendants' discriminatory housing practices are
  • Failing or refusing, to the extent possible, to bring the dwelling units and public use and
  • Awards such damages as would fully compensate each person aggrieved by defendants'
  • Assesses a civil penalty against defendants in an amount authorized by law.
  • Assistant Attorney General
  • Housing and Civil Enforcement Section
  •    |