LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

UNITED STATES v COLUMBUS COUNTY, NC Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: USVCCN184126, CourtName: US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Plaintiff: UNITED STATES, State: NC North Carolina, UniqueCaseRef: LCD>USVCCN184126, County, Settlement Agreement, Aging, United States, Freeman, Complaint, Employment, Sexual Harassment, North Carolina, Columbus County, In-home, Employee, Francina Freeman, Vii, Discrimination, Policy, Civil Rights, Civil Rights Act, Eeoc Charge, Training Session, United States District, Equal Employment Opportunity, Employment Opportunity Commission, In-home Aide, Monetary Award, In-home Service, Plaintiff United States, Provisions, Defendant County, Discriminatory, Failing, Charge, Justice , ContentID: 120249292

Case Documents
1   SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 121323
15 pages
HTML
2 1994-01 COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 121322
3 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 2 documents , 18 pages
Price: $ 24.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
AGING
UNITED STATES
FREEMAN
COMPLAINT
EMPLOYMENT
SEXUAL HARASSMENT
NORTH CAROLINA
COLUMBUS COUNTY
COURT
IN-HOME
EMPLOYEE
DEFENDANT
DISCRIMINATION
VII
FRANCINA FREEMAN
POLICY
CIVIL RIGHTS
CIVIL RIGHTS ACT
EEOC CHARGE
TRAINING SESSION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY
EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION
IN-HOME AIDE
MONETARY AWARD
IN-HOME SERVICE
PLAINTIFF UNITED STATES
PROVISIONS
                    IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

   UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

   Plaintiff,

   v.

   COLUMBUS COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA,
   Defendant.

                            SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

   Plaintiff United States of America and defendant Columbus County,
   North Carolina ("Defendant" or "County") by and through their
   respective attorneys agree and stipulate as follows:

   1. The above-captioned action was brought by the United States against
   the County to enforce the provisions of Title VII of the Civil Rights
   Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et seq. ("Title VII"),
   following receipt by the Department of Justice from the Equal
   Employment Opportunity Commission ("EEOC") of EEOC Charge No.
   141-94-0719 filed by Francina Freeman.

   2. In its Complaint, the United States alleges that, during Francina
   Freeman's employment in the Columbus County Department of Aging
   ("Department of Aging") as an In-Home Aide, Defendant County, through
   the Department of Aging, discriminated against Ms. Freeman on the
   basis of her sex (female) and retaliated against her, in violation of
   Sections 703(a) and 704(a) of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e-2(a) and
   -3(a), by, among other things:

   (a) subjecting Ms. Freeman to a sexually hostile work environment by
   assigning her to a work site in which it knew or should have known
   that Ms. Freeman would be subjected to unwelcome and offensive
   touching of a sexual nature and failing to take prompt and appropriate
   remedial action to eliminate the hostile work environment;

   (b) failing or refusing to assign Ms. Freeman work because of her
   opposition to the unwelcome sexual conduct; and

   (c) failing or refusing to take appropriate action to remedy the
   effects of the discriminatory treatment of Ms. Freeman.

   3. The County denies that it has discriminated in any manner against
   Ms. Freeman in violation of Title VII.
SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
  • FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
  • Plaintiff United States of America and defendant Columbus County, North Carolina by and
  • The above-captioned action was brought by the United States against the County to enforce the
  • of EEOC Charge No. 141-94-0719 filed by Francina Freeman.
  • In its Complaint, the United States alleges that, during Francina Freeman's employment in the
  • The Court has jurisdiction over the parties and the subject matter of this action, venue is
  • The Settlement Agreement constitutes the complete agreement between the parties with respect Court.
  • The County by and through its officials, agents, employees and all persons in active concert harassment; otherwise creating, maintaining, supporting or condoning a sexually hostile work
  • In settlement of the claim of the United States for relief on behalf of Francina Freeman, the
  • The principal amount of the back pay monetary award shall be subject to withholding for
  • ADOPTION AND MAINTENANCE OF SEXUAL HARASSMENT POLICY
  • Within thirty days after the execution of this Settlement Agreement by the parties, the
  • The County will retain a consultant/trainer who will conduct the training session.
  • A settlement agreement has been entered settling a complaint of employment discrimination
  • The above relief is being offered to you on the following condition: in order to accept the
  • Sexual harassment violates Title VII of the federal Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Columbus
  • Sexual harassment is defined by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission as
  • In particular, the Department will not tolerate harassment of a Department of Aging employee,

  • 2 . COMPLAINT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    UNITED STATES
    COUNTY
    NORTH CAROLINA
    DEFENDANT COUNTY
    CIVIL RIGHTS
    DISCRIMINATORY
    EMPLOYMENT
    AGING
    FRANCINA FREEMAN
    PLAINTIFF
    VII
    FAILING
    CHARGE
    ATTORNEY
    JUSTICE
    RELIEF
    EASTERN DISTRICT
    COURT
    CIVIL RIGHTS DIVISION
    COLUMBUS COUNTY
    ALLEGES
    CIVIL RIGHTS ACT
    RETALIATION
    HOSTILE WORK ENVIRONMENT
    REFUSING
    SEXUAL HARASSMENT
    PURSUANT
    SEXUALLY HOSTILE WORK
    UNWELCOME
    
                        IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                     FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
                                WILMINGTON DIVISION
    
       UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
       Plaintiff,
    
       v.
    
       COLUMBUS COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA,
       Defendant.
    
                        COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
    
       Plaintiff, United States of America, alleges: 1. This action is
       brought on behalf of the United States to enforce the provisions of
       Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.
       2000e, et seq. ("Title VII"). 2. This Court has jurisdiction of the
       action under 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(f) and 28 U.S.C. § 1345. 3. Defendant
       Columbus County, North Carolina ("County") is a political subdivision
       of the State of North Carolina and possesses the power to sue and be
       sued. N.C. Stat.Ann. § 153A-11. 4. Defendant County is a person within
       the meaning of 42 U.S.C. § 2000e(a) and an employer within the meaning
       of 42 U.S.C. § 2000e(b). 5. Columbus County Department of Aging
       ("Department of Aging") is an agency of defendant County. 6. Between
       May 1993 and January 1994, Francina Freeman was employed in the
       Department of Aging as an In-Home Aide. 7. Defendant County, through
       its Department of Aging, has discriminated against Francina Freeman on
       the basis of her sex in violation of Section 703(a), 42 U.S.C.
       2000e-2(a), and retaliated against her in violation of Section 704(a)
       of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-3(a), by, among other things: (a)
       Subjecting Ms. Freeman to a sexually hostile work environment by
       assigning her to work in an environment in which it knew or should
       have known that Ms. Freeman would be subjected to unwelcome and
       offensive touching of a sexual nature and failing to take prompt and
       appropriate remedial action to eliminate the sexually hostile work
       environment; (b) Failing or refusing to assign Ms. Freeman work
       because of her opposition to the unwelcome sexual conduct; and (c)
       Failing or refusing to take appropriate action to remedy the effects
       of the discriminatory treatment of Ms. Freeman.
    
       8. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("EEOC") received a
       timely charge filed by Francina Freeman (Charge No. 141-94-0719) in
       which she alleged that she had been discriminated against in
       employment by the Department of Aging by being sexually harassed and
       retaliated against because she opposed such harassment. Pursuant to
       Section 706 of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5, the EEOC investigated
       the charge, found reasonable cause to believe that the allegations of
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
  • FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
  • Plaintiff, United States of America, alleges:
  • ("Title VII").
  • Defendant Columbus County, North Carolina is a political subdivision of the State of North
  • Columbus County Department of Aging is an agency of defendant County.
  • Between May 1993 and January 1994, Francina Freeman was employed in the Department of Aging
  • Freeman would be subjected to unwelcome and offensive touching of a sexual nature and failing
  • Freeman work because of her opposition to the unwelcome sexual conduct; and Failing or
  • The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission received a timely charge filed by Francina
  • Pursuant to Section 706 of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5, the EEOC investigated the charge,
  • plaintiff United States prays that this Court grant the following relief:
  • Award compensatory damages to Francina Freeman to fully compensate her for injuries caused by
  • The Plaintiff prays for such additional relief as justice may require, together with its
  • Acting Assistant Attorney General Civil Rights Division
  • United States Attorney Eastern District of North Carolina
  •    |