![]() |
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1
.
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AGING UNITED STATES FREEMAN COMPLAINT EMPLOYMENT SEXUAL HARASSMENT NORTH CAROLINA COLUMBUS COUNTY COURT IN-HOME EMPLOYEE DEFENDANT DISCRIMINATION VII FRANCINA FREEMAN POLICY CIVIL RIGHTS CIVIL RIGHTS ACT EEOC CHARGE TRAINING SESSION UNITED STATES DISTRICT EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION IN-HOME AIDE MONETARY AWARD IN-HOME SERVICE PLAINTIFF UNITED STATES PROVISIONS |
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
v.
COLUMBUS COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA,
Defendant.
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
Plaintiff United States of America and defendant Columbus County,
North Carolina ("Defendant" or "County") by and through their
respective attorneys agree and stipulate as follows:
1. The above-captioned action was brought by the United States against
the County to enforce the provisions of Title VII of the Civil Rights
Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et seq. ("Title VII"),
following receipt by the Department of Justice from the Equal
Employment Opportunity Commission ("EEOC") of EEOC Charge No.
141-94-0719 filed by Francina Freeman.
2. In its Complaint, the United States alleges that, during Francina
Freeman's employment in the Columbus County Department of Aging
("Department of Aging") as an In-Home Aide, Defendant County, through
the Department of Aging, discriminated against Ms. Freeman on the
basis of her sex (female) and retaliated against her, in violation of
Sections 703(a) and 704(a) of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e-2(a) and
-3(a), by, among other things:
(a) subjecting Ms. Freeman to a sexually hostile work environment by
assigning her to a work site in which it knew or should have known
that Ms. Freeman would be subjected to unwelcome and offensive
touching of a sexual nature and failing to take prompt and appropriate
remedial action to eliminate the hostile work environment;
(b) failing or refusing to assign Ms. Freeman work because of her
opposition to the unwelcome sexual conduct; and
(c) failing or refusing to take appropriate action to remedy the
effects of the discriminatory treatment of Ms. Freeman.
3. The County denies that it has discriminated in any manner against
Ms. Freeman in violation of Title VII.
SNIPPETS:
|
|
2
.
COMPLAINT
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
UNITED STATES COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA DEFENDANT COUNTY CIVIL RIGHTS DISCRIMINATORY EMPLOYMENT AGING FRANCINA FREEMAN PLAINTIFF VII FAILING CHARGE ATTORNEY JUSTICE RELIEF EASTERN DISTRICT COURT CIVIL RIGHTS DIVISION COLUMBUS COUNTY ALLEGES CIVIL RIGHTS ACT RETALIATION HOSTILE WORK ENVIRONMENT REFUSING SEXUAL HARASSMENT PURSUANT SEXUALLY HOSTILE WORK UNWELCOME |
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
WILMINGTON DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
v.
COLUMBUS COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA,
Defendant.
COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
Plaintiff, United States of America, alleges: 1. This action is
brought on behalf of the United States to enforce the provisions of
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.
2000e, et seq. ("Title VII"). 2. This Court has jurisdiction of the
action under 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(f) and 28 U.S.C. § 1345. 3. Defendant
Columbus County, North Carolina ("County") is a political subdivision
of the State of North Carolina and possesses the power to sue and be
sued. N.C. Stat.Ann. § 153A-11. 4. Defendant County is a person within
the meaning of 42 U.S.C. § 2000e(a) and an employer within the meaning
of 42 U.S.C. § 2000e(b). 5. Columbus County Department of Aging
("Department of Aging") is an agency of defendant County. 6. Between
May 1993 and January 1994, Francina Freeman was employed in the
Department of Aging as an In-Home Aide. 7. Defendant County, through
its Department of Aging, has discriminated against Francina Freeman on
the basis of her sex in violation of Section 703(a), 42 U.S.C.
2000e-2(a), and retaliated against her in violation of Section 704(a)
of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-3(a), by, among other things: (a)
Subjecting Ms. Freeman to a sexually hostile work environment by
assigning her to work in an environment in which it knew or should
have known that Ms. Freeman would be subjected to unwelcome and
offensive touching of a sexual nature and failing to take prompt and
appropriate remedial action to eliminate the sexually hostile work
environment; (b) Failing or refusing to assign Ms. Freeman work
because of her opposition to the unwelcome sexual conduct; and (c)
Failing or refusing to take appropriate action to remedy the effects
of the discriminatory treatment of Ms. Freeman.
8. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("EEOC") received a
timely charge filed by Francina Freeman (Charge No. 141-94-0719) in
which she alleged that she had been discriminated against in
employment by the Department of Aging by being sexually harassed and
retaliated against because she opposed such harassment. Pursuant to
Section 706 of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5, the EEOC investigated
the charge, found reasonable cause to believe that the allegations of
SNIPPETS:
|
| | | |