 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1
.
CONSENT DECREE
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
DECREE UNITED STATES EMPLOYMENT CARRILLO COURT COMPLAINTS PARTIES CONSENT DECREE CHARGES CITY VII ENTRY RESOLVE MONETARY AWARD OKLAHOMA JUSTICE NATIONAL ORIGIN DISCRIMINATION SETTLEMENT COUNSEL PAY PARTY ATTORNEY DISPUTE VIOLATION LITIGATION JURISDICTION RELIEF PRACTICES |
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
v.
CIVIL ACTION NO.
CITY OF SULPHUR, OKLAHOMA
Defendant.
CONSENT DECREE
This action was brought by the United States against the City of
Sulphur ("Sulphur") to enforce the provisions of Title VII of the
Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et seq.
("Title VII"), following receipt by the Department of Justice from the
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("EEOC") of a charge filed by
Cruz Carrillo, a Sulphur employee.
In its complaint, the United States alleges that Sulphur violated
Title VII when it improperly considered Mr. Carrillo's national
origin, Mexican-American, in making its decision to deny Mr. Carrillo
a promotion to the position of Sanitation Department Superintendent.
The City of Sulphur denies any violation of Title VII and the
allegations of discrimination.
The parties, desiring that this action be settled by appropriate
consent decree and without the burden of protracted litigation, agree
to the jurisdiction of this Court over the parties and the subject
matter of this action. Subject to the Court's approval of this Consent
Decree, the parties waive a hearing and findings of fact and
conclusions of law on all issues, and further agree to the entry of
this Decree as final and binding between themselves as to the issues
raised in the United States' complaint filed in this case and the
matters resolved in this Decree.
This Decree, being entered with the consent of the parties, shall in
no way constitute an adjudication or finding on the merits of the
case, nor be construed as an admission by Sulphur or a finding of any
wrongdoing or violation of any applicable federal or state law or
regulation.
SNIPPETS:
|
|
2
.
COMPLAINT
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
UNITED STATES DISCRIMINATION CARILLO OKLAHOMA DEFENDANT CIVIL RIGHTS ACT PLAINTIFF PURSUANT ATTORNEY EASTERN DISTRICT COURT SULPHUR VII NATIONAL ORIGIN FAILING REFUSING CHARGE JUSTICE AMERICA CITY ALLEGES MEANING EMPLOYER BASIS SANITATION DEPARTMENT SUPERINTENDENT EEOC PLAINTIFF PRAYS RELIEF COMPENSATORY |
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
v.
CITY OF SULPHUR, OKLAHOMA,
Defendant.
____________________________________
CIVIL ACTION NO.
COMPLAINT
Plaintiff, United States of America, alleges:
1. This action is brought on behalf of the United States to enforce
the provisions of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as
amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et seq.
2. This Court has jurisdiction of the action under 42 U.S.C.
2000e-5(f) and 28 U.S.C. §1345.
3. The defendant, City of Sulphur (hereinafter referred to as
"Sulphur"), is a corporate, governmental body created pursuant to the
laws of the State of Oklahoma.
4. The defendant is a person within the meaning of 42 U.S.C.
2000e(a) and an employer within the meaning of 42 U.S.C. § 2000e(b).
5. The defendant has subjected Cruz Carillo to discrimination on the
basis of his national origin, Mexican-American, in violation of Title
VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.
2000e-2(a), among other ways, by:
(a) Failing or refusing to hire or promote Mr. Carillo to the position
of Sanitation Department Superintendent and to pay him accordingly;
and;
(b) Failing or refusing to take appropriate action to remedy the
effects of the discriminatory treatment of Mr. Carillo.
6. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) received a
timely charge filed by Mr. Carillo, alleging that he had been
discriminated against on the basis of his national origin by Sulphur
SNIPPETS:
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|
