LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

UNITED STATES v CITY OF NEWTON, NORTH CAROLINA Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: USVCONNC236568, CourtName: US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Plaintiff: UNITED STATES, State: NC North Carolina, UniqueCaseRef: LCD>USVCONNC236568, City, Employee, Racial Harassment, United States, Decree, Race, Newton, Policy, Complaint, North Carolina, Discrimination, Stokley, Civil Rights, Consent Decree, Vii, Policy Statement, Charge, Alleges, Basis, Reporting, Employment, District, Act, Entry, Civil Rights Act, Violation, Purpose, Refer, Attention, Defendant Newton, Pursuant, Compliance, Charlotte, Justice, Relief, Western District, Civil Rights Division, Meaning, Donald Stokley, Sanitation Worker, Failing, Refusing , ContentID: 120249285

Case Documents
1   CONSENT DECREE
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 121312
10 pages
HTML
2   COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 121311
3 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 2 documents , 13 pages
Price: $ 24.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . CONSENT DECREE

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
CITY
RACIAL HARASSMENT
DECREE
UNITED STATES
POLICY
RACE
NEWTON
COMPLAINT
CONSENT DECREE
POLICY STATEMENT
NORTH CAROLINA
COURT
STOKLEY
VII
DISCRIMINATION
REPORTING
DISTRICT
CIVIL RIGHTS
ACT
CHARGE
ENTRY
ALLEGES
VIOLATION
BASIS
PURPOSE
REFER
ATTENTION
COMPLIANCE
CHARLOTTE
                    IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                 FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
                            STATESVILLE DIVISION
                        Civil Action No. 5:99CV189-V

   UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
   Plaintiff,
   &
   DONALD R. STOKLEY,
   Plaintiff-Intervenor,
   v.
   CITY OF NEWTON, NORTH CAROLINA,
   Defendant.

                  CONSENT DECREE BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES
                   AND THE CITY OF NEWTON, NORTH CAROLINA

   This action was brought by the United States of America ("United
   States") against the City of Newton, North Carolina, ("the City"
   or "Defendant") to enforce the provisions of Title VII of the
   Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. Section 2000e,et seq.
   ("Title VII"), following receipt by the United States Department
   of Justice from the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
   ("EEOC") of EEOC Charge Number 140-97-1556 filed by Donald R.
   Stokley.

   In its Complaint, the United States alleges that the City has
   discriminated against Mr. Stokley, a male formerly employed as a
   sanitation worker in the City's Department of Public Works and
   Utilities, in violation of Section 703(a) of Title VII of the Civil
   Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. Section 2000e-2(a), among
   other ways by:

   a. subjecting Mr. Stokley to racial harassment while he was employed
   in the City's Department of Public Works and Utilities on the basis of
   his race and his association with a black person;

   b. discharging Mr. Stokley from his employment as a sanitation worker
   on the basis of his race and his association with a black person; and

   c. failing or refusing to take appropriate action to remedy the
   effects of the discrimination against Mr. Stokley.

   The City denies that it has discriminated in any manner against Mr.
   Stokley in violation of Title VII. Nonetheless, the parties, desiring
   that this action be settled by an appropriate Consent Decree and
   without the burden of protracted litigation, agree to the jurisdiction
   of this Court over the parties, and the subject matter of this action,
SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
  • FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
  • CONSENT DECREE BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES
  • AND THE CITY OF NEWTON,
  • This action was brought by the United States of America against the City of Newton, North
  • of EEOC Charge Number 140-97-1556 filed by Donald R. Stokley.
  • In its Complaint, the United States alleges that the City has discriminated against Mr.
  • subjecting Mr. Stokley to racial harassment while he was employed in the City's Department of
  • failing or refusing to take appropriate action to remedy the effects of the discrimination
  • The City denies that it has discriminated in any manner against Mr. Stokley in violation of e to the entry of this Consent Decree as final and binding among themselves as to all issues raised
  • "date of entry of the Decree" shall refer to the date on which the Court approves and
  • The City shall not retaliate against or in any respect adversely affect any person because
  • No later than July 15, 2000, the City shall issue and distribute to all current City
  • No later than August 1, 2000, the City shall provide the United States with written
  • The City shall require all current and future employees to sign and date an acknowledgment of
  • If the employee contends that the supervisor committed, participated in, or allowed the
  • This training shall at a minimum instruct all employees on what acts may constitute racial
  • On or before June 30th of each year this Decree is in effect, the City shall forward to the
  • the Court shall retain jurisdiction over this action for the purpose of resolving disputes or
  • WILLIAM B. FENTON CHARLOTTE BURROWS BARBARA J. MEACHAM

  • 2 . COMPLAINT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    CIVIL RIGHTS
    EMPLOYMENT
    DISCRIMINATION
    STOKLEY
    NORTH CAROLINA
    NEWTON
    CITY
    CIVIL RIGHTS ACT
    PLAINTIFF
    DEFENDANT NEWTON
    ALLEGES
    VII
    PURSUANT
    RACE
    CHARGE
    JUSTICE
    ATTORNEY
    RELIEF
    WESTERN DISTRICT
    COURT
    CIVIL RIGHTS DIVISION
    COMPLAINT
    MEANING
    DONALD STOKLEY
    SANITATION WORKER
    RACIAL HARASSMENT
    BASIS
    FAILING
    REFUSING
    
                        IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
    
                     FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
    
                                STATESVILLE DIVISION
    
       UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
       Plaintiff,
       v.
       CITY OF NEWTON, NORTH CAROLINA,
       Defendant.
    
                        COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
    
       Plaintiff, United States of America, alleges:
    
       1. This action is brought on behalf of the United States to enforce
       the provisions of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as
       amended, 42 U.S.C. Section 2000e, et seq. ("Title VII").
    
       2. This Court has jurisdiction over the action under 42 U.S.C. Section
       2000e-5(f) and 28 U.S.C. Section 1345.
    
       3. Defendant Newton, North Carolina (hereinafter referred to as
       "Newton" or "the City") is a political subdivision of the State of
       North Carolina created pursuant to North Carolina law.
    
       4. Defendant Newton is a person within the meaning of 42 U.S.C.
       Section 2000e(a), and an employer within the meaning of 42 U.S.C.
       Section 2000e(b).
    
       5. Defendant Newton has discriminated against Donald Stokley, a white
       male formerly employed as a sanitation worker in the City's Department
       of Public Works and Utilities, because of his race, white, and his
       association with a black person, in violation of Section 703(a) of
       Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.
       Section 2000e-2(a), among other ways, by:
    
       a. subjecting Mr. Stokley to racial harassment while he was employed
       in the City's Department of Public Works and Utilities on the basis of
       his race and his association with a black person;
    
       b. discharging Mr. Stokley from his employment as a sanitation worker
       on the basis of his race and his association with a black person; and
    
       c. failing or refusing to take appropriate action to remedy the
       effects of the discrimination against Mr. Stokley.
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
  • FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
  • Plaintiff, v. CITY OF NEWTON, NORTH CAROLINA,
  • COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
  • Plaintiff, United States of America, alleges:
  • This action is brought on behalf of the United States to enforce the provisions of Title VII
  • ("Title VII").
  • Defendant Newton, North Carolina (hereinafter referred to as "Newton" or "the City") is a
  • Defendant Newton is a person within the meaning of 42 U.S.C. Section 2000e, and an employer
  • Defendant Newton has discriminated against Donald Stokley, a white male formerly employed as
  • subjecting Mr. Stokley to racial harassment while he was employed in the City's Department of
  • failing or refusing to take appropriate action to remedy the effects of the discrimination
  • The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission received a timely charge filed by Mr. Stokley in
  • plaintiff United States prays that this Court grant the following relief:
  • provide sufficient remedial relief to make whole Donald Stokley for the loss he has suffered
  • The plaintiff prays for such additional relief as justice may require, together with its
  • Acting Assistant Attorney General Civil Rights Division
  • United States Attorney Western District of North Carolina
  •    |