![]() |
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1
.
CONSENT DECREE
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
CITY RACIAL HARASSMENT DECREE UNITED STATES POLICY RACE NEWTON COMPLAINT CONSENT DECREE POLICY STATEMENT NORTH CAROLINA COURT STOKLEY VII DISCRIMINATION REPORTING DISTRICT CIVIL RIGHTS ACT CHARGE ENTRY ALLEGES VIOLATION BASIS PURPOSE REFER ATTENTION COMPLIANCE CHARLOTTE |
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
STATESVILLE DIVISION
Civil Action No. 5:99CV189-V
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
&
DONALD R. STOKLEY,
Plaintiff-Intervenor,
v.
CITY OF NEWTON, NORTH CAROLINA,
Defendant.
CONSENT DECREE BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES
AND THE CITY OF NEWTON, NORTH CAROLINA
This action was brought by the United States of America ("United
States") against the City of Newton, North Carolina, ("the City"
or "Defendant") to enforce the provisions of Title VII of the
Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. Section 2000e,et seq.
("Title VII"), following receipt by the United States Department
of Justice from the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
("EEOC") of EEOC Charge Number 140-97-1556 filed by Donald R.
Stokley.
In its Complaint, the United States alleges that the City has
discriminated against Mr. Stokley, a male formerly employed as a
sanitation worker in the City's Department of Public Works and
Utilities, in violation of Section 703(a) of Title VII of the Civil
Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. Section 2000e-2(a), among
other ways by:
a. subjecting Mr. Stokley to racial harassment while he was employed
in the City's Department of Public Works and Utilities on the basis of
his race and his association with a black person;
b. discharging Mr. Stokley from his employment as a sanitation worker
on the basis of his race and his association with a black person; and
c. failing or refusing to take appropriate action to remedy the
effects of the discrimination against Mr. Stokley.
The City denies that it has discriminated in any manner against Mr.
Stokley in violation of Title VII. Nonetheless, the parties, desiring
that this action be settled by an appropriate Consent Decree and
without the burden of protracted litigation, agree to the jurisdiction
of this Court over the parties, and the subject matter of this action,
SNIPPETS:
|
|
2
.
COMPLAINT
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
CIVIL RIGHTS EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION STOKLEY NORTH CAROLINA NEWTON CITY CIVIL RIGHTS ACT PLAINTIFF DEFENDANT NEWTON ALLEGES VII PURSUANT RACE CHARGE JUSTICE ATTORNEY RELIEF WESTERN DISTRICT COURT CIVIL RIGHTS DIVISION COMPLAINT MEANING DONALD STOKLEY SANITATION WORKER RACIAL HARASSMENT BASIS FAILING REFUSING |
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
STATESVILLE DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
v.
CITY OF NEWTON, NORTH CAROLINA,
Defendant.
COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
Plaintiff, United States of America, alleges:
1. This action is brought on behalf of the United States to enforce
the provisions of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as
amended, 42 U.S.C. Section 2000e, et seq. ("Title VII").
2. This Court has jurisdiction over the action under 42 U.S.C. Section
2000e-5(f) and 28 U.S.C. Section 1345.
3. Defendant Newton, North Carolina (hereinafter referred to as
"Newton" or "the City") is a political subdivision of the State of
North Carolina created pursuant to North Carolina law.
4. Defendant Newton is a person within the meaning of 42 U.S.C.
Section 2000e(a), and an employer within the meaning of 42 U.S.C.
Section 2000e(b).
5. Defendant Newton has discriminated against Donald Stokley, a white
male formerly employed as a sanitation worker in the City's Department
of Public Works and Utilities, because of his race, white, and his
association with a black person, in violation of Section 703(a) of
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.
Section 2000e-2(a), among other ways, by:
a. subjecting Mr. Stokley to racial harassment while he was employed
in the City's Department of Public Works and Utilities on the basis of
his race and his association with a black person;
b. discharging Mr. Stokley from his employment as a sanitation worker
on the basis of his race and his association with a black person; and
c. failing or refusing to take appropriate action to remedy the
effects of the discrimination against Mr. Stokley.
SNIPPETS:
|
| | | |