LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

UNITED STATES v CITY OF MILWAUKEE Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: USVCOM171607, CourtName: US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Plaintiff: UNITED STATES, State: WI Wisconsin, UniqueCaseRef: LCD>USVCOM171607, City, Housing, Milwaukee, United States, Howard Site, Private Plaintiffs, Senior Project, American Indians, Ice, Consent Order, District, Fair Housing Act, Senior, Common Council, Rezoning, Development Agreement, Race, National Origin, Discriminatory Actions, Neighborhood, Construction, Sisters, Francis, Alderwoman, Residents, Zoning, Plan, Violation, Discriminating, Entry, Wisconsin, Aldermanic District, Complexes, Senior Citizens, Alderwoman Scherbert, Opposition, Zoning Request, Indian , ContentID: 120249284

Case Documents
1   COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 121309
5 pages
HTML
2 1994-10-17 CONSENT ORDER
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 121310
5 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 2 documents , 10 pages
Price: $ 24.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . COMPLAINT

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
MILWAUKEE
AMERICAN INDIANS
ICE
HOUSING
SENIOR
UNITED STATES
CITY
DEFENDANT
COMMON COUNCIL
DISCRIMINATORY ACTIONS
DISTRICT
NEIGHBORHOOD
SISTERS
FRANCIS
ALDERWOMAN
RESIDENTS
ZONING
PLAN
WISCONSIN
ALDERMANIC DISTRICT
COMPLEXES
SENIOR CITIZENS
ALDERWOMAN SCHERBERT
REZONING
OPPOSITION
ZONING REQUEST
UNLAWFUL
CIVIL
ACCEPTANCE
                        UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                       EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

   UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
        Plaintiff,

   v.

                                                        Case No. 97-C-104

   CITY OF MILWAUKEE,
        Defendant.

   ______________________________

                                 COMPLAINT

    1. This action is brought by the United States of America to enforce
       the provisions of the Fair Housing Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C.
       3601 et seq.
    2. This Court has jurisdiction over this action under 28 U.S.C.
       1345 and 42 U.S.C. § 3614.
    3. Defendant City of Milwaukee is a governmental subdivision of the
       State of Wisconsin, located in Milwaukee County, within the
       Eastern District of Wisconsin. Milwaukee is governed by a Mayor
       and a Common Council consisting of seventeen (17) alderpersons,
       each elected by an aldermanic district.
    4. The Indian Council of the Elderly, Inc. is a nonprofit corporation
       in Milwaukee that was established to serve the American Indian
       community of Greater Milwaukee by providing such services as meals
       for elderly American Indians, preventative medical services,
       counseling services and recreational activities.
    5. The School Sisters of St. Francis and the Sisters of St. Francis
       of Assisi are two Catholic religious orders located in the Greater
       Milwaukee area that have experience in managing housing complexes
       for senior citizens that receive funds from the United States
       Department of Housing and Urban Development.
    6. In or around 1990, the Indian Council of the Elderly, the School
       Sisters of St. Francis, and the Sisters of St. Francis of Assisi
       (collectively, "ICE") sought to construct a senior center that
       would consist of 49 apartment units of senior citizen housing and
       a meal site in southwest Milwaukee for the benefit of American
       Indian and other senior citizens.
    7. In September 1993, ICE made an offer to purchase a 3.8 acre parcel
       of land at 6031 West Howard Avenue ("the Howard site") in
       Milwaukee, for the purpose of constructing the ICE senior center.
       The Howard site is located adjacent to or across from several
       commercial businesses, multifamily housing complexes, and single
SNIPPETS:
  • UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
  • EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
  • Defendant City of Milwaukee is a governmental subdivision of the State of Wisconsin, located
  • Milwaukee is governed by a Mayor and a Common Council consisting of seventeen alderpersons,
  • The Indian Council of the Elderly, Inc. is a nonprofit corporation in Milwaukee that was
  • The School Sisters of St. Francis and the Sisters of St. Francis of Assisi are two Catholic
  • In September 1993, ICE made an offer to purchase a 3.8 acre parcel of land at 6031 West
  • Alderwoman Scherbert actively opposed ICE's rezoning application and engaged in various
  • At public meetings on January 25, 1994 and March 7, 1994, and at subsequent City Plan
  • On May 17, 1994, despite the endorsement of the City Plan Commission and ICE's acceptance of
  • Persons and entities who have been victims of the defendant's unlawful actions, such as the
  • Requires such actions by the defendant as may be necessary to restore all persons aggrieved
  • Assesses civil penalties against the defendant in amounts of money authorized by 42 U.S.C. §

  • 2 . CONSENT ORDER

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    PRIVATE PLAINTIFFS
    HOUSING
    SENIOR PROJECT
    CONSENT ORDER
    FAIR HOUSING ACT
    UNITED STATES
    DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
    RACE
    NATIONAL ORIGIN
    COURT
    MILWAUKEE
    CONSTRUCTION
    DISTRICT
    VIOLATION
    DISCRIMINATING
    ENTRY
    INDIAN
    COUNCIL
    ALLEGE
    PURSUANT
    WEST HOWARD AVENUE
    REZONING
    PARTIES
    REPORT
    COUNSEL
    BASIS
    CIVIL RIGHTS
    AUTHORIZES
    REZONING REQUEST
    
                            UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                           EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
    
       INDIAN COUNCIL OF THE
       ELDERLY, INC., et al.,
            Plaintiffs,
    
       v.
    
                                                           Case No. 94-C-1156
    
       CITY OF MILWAUKEE,
            Defendant.
    
       ___________________________________
    
       UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
            Plaintiff,
    
       v.
    
                                                            Case No. 97-C-104
    
       CITY OF MILWAUKEE,
            Defendant.
    
       ___________________________________
    
                                   CONSENT ORDER
    
        I. INTRODUCTION
           These consolidated actions allege, in pertinent part, that the
           City of Milwaukee ("City") denied a zoning change to permit the
           construction and operation of a housing facility and meal site, in
           violation of the Fair Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. § 3601, et seq., by
           discriminating on the basis of race or national origin against
           American Indians.
           On October 17, 1994, the Indian Council of the Elderly, Inc., the
           Sisters of St. Francis of Assisi and the School Sisters of St.
           Francis (together, the "private plaintiffs") brought this suit
           against the City pursuant to Section 813 of the Fair Housing Act,
           42 U.S.C. § 3613, as well as other civil rights statutes. The
           private plaintiffs allege that the City denied a zoning change
           necessary to permit the construction and operation of a senior
           project that was to include forty-nine apartment units of
           low-income senior citizen housing and a meal site for American
           Indian and other senior citizens (the "senior project"), because
           of the race or national origin of the prospective residents. The
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
  • EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
  • CITY OF MILWAUKEE,
  • These consolidated actions allege, in pertinent part, that the City of Milwaukee denied a
  • On October 17, 1994, the Indian Council of the Elderly, Inc., the Sisters of St. Francis of
  • The private plaintiffs allege that the City denied a zoning change necessary to permit the
  • The senior project was to be situated at 6031 West Howard Avenue, in the Eleventh Aldermanic
  • Section 814of the Fair Housing Act authorizes the Attorney General to initiate a lawsuit in
  • the United States alleges that the City violated the Fair Housing Act by denying the rezoning
  • In its answer to the complaints, the City denied that it engaged in discrimination on the
  • the parties have engaged in lengthy negotiations and have voluntarily agreed that this
  • After reviewing the terms of this Order, the Court concludes that the entry of this Consent
  • Intergovernmental Cooperation and Development Agreement --Indian Council of the Elderly
  • Within thirty days from the date of entry of this Consent Order, the City shall file with
  • After the initial report, the City shall file this report at least every six months until the
  •    |