LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

UNITED STATES v CITY and COUNTY OF DENVER Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: USVCACOD210754, CourtName: US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Plaintiff: UNITED STATES, State: CO Colorado, UniqueCaseRef: LCD>USVCACOD210754, Denver, District Court, United States, Jury, Vacant Position, Employment, Evidence, Instruction, Cir, City, Discrimination, Career Service, App, Congress, Police, Davoll, Sufficiency, Regulations, Ada, Appeals, Employees, Police Department, Jurisdiction, Reasonable Accommodation, Disabilities, Classified Service, Phrase, Reassignment, County, Interpretation, Legislation, Plain Error, Discovery, Qualified Individuals, Jack Davoll, Evidentiary Rulings, Discretion, Admission , ContentID: 120249276

Case Documents
1   SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 121296
24 pages
PDF
2   APPELLATE BRIEF
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 121295
65 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 2 documents , 89 pages
Price: $ 24.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
COURT
DISCRIMINATION
CONGRESS
UNITED STATES
REGULATIONS
JURISDICTION
CITY
ADA
DISTRICT COURT
CIR
PHRASE
COUNTY
INTERPRETATION
LEGISLATION
DENVER
SETTLED INTERPRETATION
APPEALS
DISABILITY
PUBLIC ENTITY
SUBJECT-MATTER JURISDICTION
SETTLED MEANING
EDUCATION
VII
PROVISION
EMPLOYEES
FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE
PROHIBITION
CONSISTENT
SUBSEQUENT LEGISLATIVE ENACTMENTS
                Nos. 97-1381, 97-1406, 97-1403

            IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT
                       ________________

     JACK L. DAVOLL; DEBORAH A. CLAIR; PAUL L. ESCOBEDO,

                                    Plaintiffs-
                                     Appellants/Cross-Appellees

                              v.

              CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, et al.,

                                     Defendants-
                                     Appellees/Cross-Appellants
                       ________________

                   UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

                                        Plaintiff-Appellee

                              v.

              CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, et al.,

                                        Defendants-Appellants
                        ________________

       ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                 FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
                       ________________

           SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF FOR THE UNITED STATES
                  AS APPELLEE IN No. 97-1403
                       ________________

                             JESSICA DUNSAY SILVER
                             SETH M. GALANTER
                               Attorneys
                               Department of Justice
                               P.O. Box 66078
                               Washington, D.C.  20035-6078
                               (202) 307-9994



                         TABLE OF CONTENTS
SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
  • CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, et al.,
  • ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
  • WHETHER TITLE II OF THE ADA APPLIES TO EMPLOYMENT IS
  • DISCRIMINATION
  • of the Phrase "Program or Activity" When It Enacted
  • Congress' Instructions About Title II Regulations Also Manifest Its Intent To Prohibit
  • Congress' Subsequent Legislative Enactments Show
  • E. The ADA's Structure Is Consistent With Reading
  • Bay Area Addiction Research & Treatment, Inc. v. City of Antioch, 1999 WL 351126 (9th Cir.
  • Title VII,
  • Individuals with Disabilities Education Act,
  • Jurisdiction & Related Matters.
  • WHETHER TITLE II OF THE ADA APPLIES TO EMPLOYMENT IS NOT A QUESTION OF SUBJECT-MATTER
  • treatment of its employees.
  • qualified individual with a disability shall,
  • of a public entity."
  • The Settled Meaning Of "Programs or Activities" Includes
  • financial assistance is to provide employment."
  • to include a provision similar to 42 U.S.C. 2000d-3.
  • prohibition of "discrimination against the handicapped under 'any
  • Congress Incorporated The Settled Interpretation Of The

  • 2 . APPELLATE BRIEF

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    DISTRICT COURT
    JURY
    VACANT POSITION
    EVIDENCE
    INSTRUCTION
    UNITED STATES
    CAREER SERVICE
    APP
    CIR
    POLICE
    DAVOLL
    CITY
    SUFFICIENCY
    POLICE DEPARTMENT
    APPEALS
    EMPLOYEES
    REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION
    DISABILITIES
    CLASSIFIED SERVICE
    PLAINTIFFS
    REASSIGNMENT
    ADA
    PLAIN ERROR
    DISCOVERY
    QUALIFIED INDIVIDUALS
    JACK DAVOLL
    EVIDENTIARY RULINGS
    DISCRETION
    ADMISSION
    
                                        ORAL ARGUMENT IS REQUESTED
    
                    Nos. 97-1381, 97-1406, 97-1403
    
                IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT
                           ________________
    
         JACK L. DAVOLL; DEBORAH A. CLAIR; PAUL L. ESCOBEDO,
    
                                        Plaintiffs-
                                         Appellants/Cross-Appellees
    
                                  v.
    
                  CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, et al.,
    
                                         Defendants-
                                         Appellees/Cross-Appellants
                           ________________
    
                       UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
    
                                            Plaintiff-Appellee
    
                                  v.
    
                  CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, et al.,
    
                                            Defendants-Appellants
                            ________________
    
           ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                     FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
                           ________________
    
          BRIEF FOR THE UNITED STATES AS APPELLEE IN 97-1403
                           ________________
    
                                 JESSICA DUNSAY SILVER
                                 SETH M. GALANTER
                                   Attorneys
                                   Department of Justice
                                   P.O. Box 66078
                                   Washington, D.C.  20035-6078
                                   (202) 307-9994
    
    
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
  • CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, et al.,
  • ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
  • Discovery and Evidentiary Rulings
  • Career Service
  • Classified Service
  • The Denver Police Department
  • Jack Davoll
  • THE DISTRICT COURT PROPERLY INSTRUCTED THE JURY
  • Davoll to a Vacant Position for Which He Was
  • the Jury that Employees with Disabilities
  • Reassignment If They Know Any Such Request
  • Obligation under the ADA by Treating
  • DENVER'S CLAIMS REGARDING THE SUFFICIENCY OF THE EVIDENCE WERE NOT PRESERVED FOR APPEAL AND,
  • Discretion in Prohibiting Denver From Using
  • Response to a Request for an Admission.
  • Additional Discovery, When It Later Permitted
  • Reasonably Accommodate the Plaintiffs.
  • F.2d 366 (10th Cir.
  •    |