LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

UNITED STATES v CANAL STREET APARTMENTS Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: USVCSA205866, CourtName: US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Plaintiff: UNITED STATES, State: ID Idaho, UniqueCaseRef: LCD>USVCSA205866, Fair Housing, Fair Housing Act, Apts, Idaho, Discriminatory, Auld, Fair Housing Council, United States, Pursuant, Dwellings, Intermountain Fair Housing, Design, Accessibility, Practices, Doors, Construction, Stewart, Complaint, Civil, District, Investment, Rights, Boise, Ground Floor, Alleges, Multifamily Dwellings, Common, Violation, Charge , ContentID: 120249271

Case Documents
1 1991-03-13 AMENDED COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 121287
5 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 5 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . AMENDED COMPLAINT

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
DEFENDANTS
FAIR HOUSING ACT
APTS
IDAHO
DISCRIMINATORY
AULD
FAIR HOUSING COUNCIL
UNITED STATES
PURSUANT
DWELLINGS
INTERMOUNTAIN FAIR HOUSING
DESIGN
ACCESSIBILITY
PRACTICES
DOORS
CONSTRUCTION
STEWART
COMPLAINT
CIVIL
DISTRICT
INVESTMENT
RIGHTS
BOISE
GROUND FLOOR
ALLEGES
MULTIFAMILY DWELLINGS
COMMON
VIOLATION
CHARGE
                        UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                         FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO

   UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
        Plaintiff,

   vs.

   CANAL STREET APARTMENTS, JAMES
   AULD, LORNA AULD, AULD
   INVESTMENT PROPERTIES, ROBERT
   STEWART, STEWART MILES &
   ASSOCIATES,
        Defendants.

   __________________________

                             AMENDED COMPLAINT

   The United States of America alleges:

    1. This action is brought by the United States to enforce the
       provisions of Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968 (the Fair
       Housing Act), as amended by the Fair Housing Amendments Act of
       1988, 42 U.S.C. §§ 3601-3619. It is brought on behalf of the
       Intermountain Fair Housing Act Council pursuant to Section 812(o)
       of the Fair Housing Act ("the Act"), as amended 42 U.S.C.
       3612(o), as well as pursuant to Section 814(a) of the Act, 42
       U.S.C. § 3614(a).
    2. This court has jurisdiction over this action under 28 U.S.C.
       1345 and 28 U.S.C. § 3614(a).
    3. Venue is proper in that the claims alleged herein arose in the
       District of Idaho.
    4. Canal Street Apartments ("Canal St. Apts.") are multifamily
       dwellings located in Boise, Idaho, in the District of Idaho.
    5. Canal St. Apts. consist of six multifamily buildings with 24
       covered ground floor dwelling units, located at 2440, 2450, 2460,
       2470, 2480, and 2490 Canal Street, Boise, Idaho.
    6. Canal St. Apts. was designed and constructed for first occupancy
       after March 13, 1991. The 24 ground floor units at Canal St. Apts.
       are dwellings within the meaning of 42 U.S.C. § 3602(b).
    7. Each of the 24 ground floor units at Canal St. Apts. is a "covered
       multifamily dwelling" within the meaning of 42 U.S.C. § 3604 (f)
       (7) (B) and is subject to the design and construction requirements
       set forth at 42 U.S.C. § 3604 (f) (3) (C).
    8. Defendants James Auld, Lorna Auld, and Auld Investment Properties,
       (hereinafter "Aulds") were at times relevant herein the
       contractors who were responsible for the construction of Canal St.
SNIPPETS:
  • UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
  • CANAL STREET APARTMENTS, JAMES AULD, LORNA AULD, AULD INVESTMENT PROPERTIES, ROBERT STEWART,
  • The United States of America alleges:
  • This action is brought by the United States to enforce the provisions of Title VIII of the
  • It is brought on behalf of the Intermountain Fair Housing Act Council pursuant to Section
  • Venue is proper in that the claims alleged herein arose in the District of Idaho.
  • Canal Street Apartments ("Canal St. Apts.") are multifamily dwellings located in Boise,
  • The 24 ground floor units at Canal St. Apts.
  • Defendants James Auld, Lorna Auld, and Auld Investment Properties, were at times relevant
  • at times relevant to the allegations of this complaint.
  • Defendant Stewart was responsible for the design of the common areas and the dwelling units
  • The Intermountain Fair Housing Council, formerly known as the Idaho Fair Housing Council, is
  • was not designed and constructed in accordance with the accessibility requirements of the
  • was designed and constructed in violation of the Fair Housing Act and to pursue a complaint
  • Based on information gathered in the investigation, the Secretary, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §
  • Accordingly, on January 29, 2001, the Secretary issued a Charge of Discrimination pursuant to
  • Ground floor units contain features of adaptive design, including but not limited to the and close the door; providing reinforcement in the walls at the tub and water closet to permit the
  • The discriminatory actions of Defendants were intentional, willful and taken in disregard for
  •    |