LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

UNITED STATES v CAMDEN PROPERTY TRUST Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: USVCPT201760, CourtName: US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Plaintiff: UNITED STATES, State: NV Nevada, UniqueCaseRef: LCD>USVCPT201760, Consent Decree, United States, Oasis, Fair Housing, Fair Housing Act, Covered Units, Retrofit, Entry Door, Camden Property Trust, Complaint, Common Areas, Tibsherany, Retrofit Cross Slopes, Total Estimated Cost, Becker Built, Accessible Parking, Construction, Oasis Properties, Apartments, Dwellings, Site Accessibility, Disabilities, Plaintiff United States, Handrails, Violation, Install Lever Hardware, Lower Thresholds, Alterations, Nevada, Pool Restrooms, Primary Entry Door , ContentID: 120249270

Case Documents
1 2000-05 PARTIAL CONSENT DECREE
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 121286
20 pages
HTML
2 2000-03 COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 121285
4 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 2 documents , 24 pages
Price: $ 24.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . PARTIAL CONSENT DECREE

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
CONSENT DECREE
UNITED STATES
OASIS
FAIR HOUSING
FAIR HOUSING ACT
COVERED UNITS
RETROFIT
ENTRY DOOR
CAMDEN PROPERTY TRUST
COMPLAINT
COMMON AREAS
TIBSHERANY
RETROFIT CROSS SLOPES
TOTAL ESTIMATED COST
BECKER BUILT
ACCESSIBLE PARKING
OASIS PROPERTIES
APARTMENTS
SITE ACCESSIBILITY
DISABILITIES
PLAINTIFF UNITED STATES
HANDRAILS
VIOLATION
INSTALL LEVER HARDWARE
LOWER THRESHOLDS
CONSTRUCTION
ALTERATIONS
POOL RESTROOMS
PRIMARY ENTRY DOOR
                        UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                             DISTRICT OF NEVADA

   UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
        Plaintiff,

   v.

                                                    CV-8-99-112-DWH (RJJ)

   CAMDEN PROPERTY TRUST; CAMDEN
   SUBSIDIARY II, INC.; GEORGE F.
   TIBSHERANY INCORPORATED;
   ROBERT V. JONES CORP.; and
   BECKER BUILT,
        Defendants.

   ___________________________________

                  PARTIAL CONSENT DECREE AS TO DEFENDANTS
             CAMDEN PROPERTY TRUST, CAMDEN SUBSIDIARY II, INC.,
            GEORGE F. TIBSHERANY INCORPORATED, AND BECKER BUILT

   Plaintiff United States and Defendants, Camden Property Trust, Camden
   Subsidiary II, Inc., George F. Tibersherany, and Becker Built, agree
   to the terms of this Consent Decree resolving the Complaint filed by
   Plaintiff United States. Defendant Robert V. Jones is not a party to
   this Consent Decree and this Decree does not resolve any of the claims
   the United States may have against Defendant Robert V. Jones.

    I. INTRODUCTION

     On February 1, 1999, the United States filed its Complaint alleging
     violations of Section 804 (f) (1)-(3) of the Fair Housing Act, 42
     U.S.C. § 3604 (f) (1)-(3), as amended by the Fair Housing
     Amendments Act of 1988, 42 U.S.C. §§ 3601-3619 (the Act).
     Specifically, the United States' Complaint alleges that the
     defendants have engaged in a pattern or practice of discrimination
     by failing to design and construct Oasis Canyon Apartments; Oasis
     Del Mar Apartments; Oasis Pines Apartments; Rock Creek Manor
     Condominiums; Oasis Reef Apartments; Oasis Rose Apartments; Oasis
     Vinings II Apartments; Oasis Vintage Apartments; and Oasis Hills
     Apartments, all located in Las Vegas, Nevada, with the features of
     accessible and adaptable design set forth in 42 U.S.C.
     § 3604(f)(3)(C).

     Defendant Camden Property Trust is a Texas real estate investment
     trust operating through its wholly owned subsidiary, Defendant
SNIPPETS:
  • UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
  • PARTIAL CONSENT DECREE AS TO DEFENDANTS
  • CAMDEN PROPERTY TRUST, CAMDEN SUBSIDIARY II, INC., GEORGE F. TIBSHERANY INCORPORATED, AND
  • Plaintiff United States and Defendants, Camden Property Trust, Camden Subsidiary II, Inc.,
  • Defendant Robert V. Jones is not a party to this Consent Decree and this Decree does not
  • On February 1, 1999, the United States filed its Complaint alleging violations of Section 804
  • the United States' Complaint alleges that the defendants have engaged in a pattern or
  • In addition to the seven Oasis properties named in the United States' Complaint, Camden
  • The Act provides that, for non-elevator residential buildings with four or more dwelling
  • Defendant Camden answered the Amended Complaint and denied any violation of the Fair Housing
  • These actions are reasonable and practicable and will increase the number of housing units on
  • NON-DISCRIMINATION IN FUTURE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION
  • Such retrofits will include, but not be limited to, installing curb cuts, retrofitting
  • Defendant Camden agrees to retrofit the slopes at the Oasis properties by performing the
  • * Install lever hardware on primary entry door to covered units and common areas * Accessible
  • Oasis Del Mar - Total Estimated Cost:
  • * Install lever hardware on primary entry door to covered units and common areas * Accessible

  • 2 . COMPLAINT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    DEFENDANTS
    DWELLINGS
    NEVADA
    RESIDENTIAL DWELLINGS
    HOUSING
    CONSTRUCTION
    UNITED STATES
    DESIGN
    ORI
    FAIR HOUSING ACT
    BUSINESS
    FAIR HOUSING
    CIVIL
    RIGHTS
    LAS VEGAS
    OASIS HILLS
    PARAGRAPH
    ACCESSIBILITY
    CSII
    PRACTICES
    DISCRIMINATORY
    OASIS CANYON
    ROCK CREEK MANOR
    CREEK MANOR
    OASIS REEF
    ROSE
    OASIS VINTAGE
    CLARK COUNTY
    ATTORNEY
    
                            UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                                 DISTRICT OF NEVADA
    
       UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
            Plaintiff,
    
       v.
    
                                                        CV-8-99-112-DWH (RJJ)
    
       CAMDEN PROPERTY TRUST; CAMDEN
       SUBSIDIARY II, INC.; GEORGE F.
       TIBSHERANY INCORPORATED;
       ROBERT V. JONES CORP.; and
       BECKER BUILT,
            Defendants.
    
       ___________________________________
    
                                     COMPLAINT
    
       The United States of America alleges:
    
        1. This action is brought by the United States to enforce the Fair
           Housing Act, Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968, as
           amended by the Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988 (Fair Housing
           Act), 42 U.S.C. §§3601-3619.
        2. This Court has jurisdiction over this action under 28 U.S.C. §1345
           and 42 U.S.C. §3614(a).
        3. The following multifamily, residential dwellings are located in
           Las Vegas, Nevada: Oasis Canyon (formerly known as Calico Canyon);
           Oasis Del Mar (formerly known as Blackhorse); Oasis Pines; Rock
           Creek Manor; Oasis Reef (formerly known as Lighthouse Cove); Oasis
           Rose (formerly known as Desert Rose); Oasis Vinings II; Oasis
           Vintage; and Oasis Hills (formerly known as Shadow Hills).
        4. The residential dwellings described in paragraph 3 were designed
           and constructed for first occupancy after March 13, 1991.
        5. The residential dwellings described in paragraph 3 are "dwellings"
           within the meaning of 42 U.S.C. §3602(b). All of the ground-floor
           units at these residential dwellings are "covered multifamily
           dwellings" within the meaning of 42 U.S.C. §3604(f)(7)(A).
        6. All of the ground-floor units described in paragraphs 3-11 are
           subject to the accessibility requirements of 42 U.S.C.
           §3604(f)(3)(C).
        7. Defendant Camden Property Trust ("CPT") is a Texas real estate
           investment trust whose principal place of business is Houston,
           Texas. Operating through its wholly owned subsidiary, defendant
           Camden Subsidiary II, Inc. ("CSII"), CPT succeeded to the business
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
  • DISTRICT OF NEVADA
  • This action is brought by the United States to enforce the Fair Housing Act, Title VIII of
  • The following multifamily, residential dwellings are located in Las Vegas, Nevada: Oasis
  • Creek Manor; Oasis Reef; Oasis Rose; Oasis Vinings II; Oasis
  • and Oasis Hills.
  • The residential dwellings described in paragraph 3 were designed and constructed for first
  • Defendant Camden Property Trust is a Texas real estate investment trust whose principal place
  • Operating through its wholly owned subsidiary, defendant Camden Subsidiary II, Inc., CPT
  • Defendant CSII is a Delaware corporation, whose principal place of business is Houston, Texas.
  • After merging with ORI through an exchange of stock, CSII succeeded to the control and
  • Specifically, ORI was directly, or through affiliated companies, including Robert V. Jones
  • ORI also owned and managed the Oasis Hills and Oasis Reef apartments.
  • Residential dwellings designed by defendant Tibsherany include Oasis Del Mar, Oasis Vinings
  • Defendants have violated 42 U.S.C. §3604by failing to design and construct one or more of the s, and thermostats in accessible locations; reinforcements in the bathroom walls to allow later
  • Failed to design and construct dwellings in compliance with the accessibility and
  • A pattern or practice of resistance to the full enjoyment of rights granted by the Fair
  • Persons who may have been the victims of defendants' discriminatory housing practices are
  • Assesses a civil penalty against each defendant in the maximum amount authorized by 42 U.S.C.
  • Acting Assistant Attorney General Civil Rights Division
  •    |