 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1
.
SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
DISTRICT COURT REGULATIONS ADARAND UNITED STATES TEA-21 APPEALS TRANSPORTATION COLORADO REMAND GOALS LEGISLATIVE HISTORY CONSTITUTIONALITY FEDERAL APPELLANTS REGULATORY SCC REC SUPPLEMENT GOVERNMENT NARROW TAILORING RECIPIENTS DISADVANTAGE DOT CONTRACT GOALS INJUNCTION GEIER PETER SMITH TRIAL ATTORNEY REGULATIONS SUPPORT |
CORRECTED COPY
No. 97-1304
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT
ADARAND CONSTRUCTORS, INC.,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
RODNEY E. SLATER, Secretary of Transportation, et al.,
Defendants-Appellants
ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Honorable Judge John L. Kane, Jr.
THE FEDERAL APPELLANTS' SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF
NANCY E. McFADDEN BILL LANN LEE
General Counsel Acting Assistant Attorney General
PAUL M. GEIER
Assistant General Counsel MARK L. GROSS
for Litigation LOUIS E. PERAERTZ
Attorneys
EDWARD V. A. KUSSY Department of Justice
Federal Highway P.O. Box 66078
Administration Washington, D.C. 20035-6078
(202) 616-2013
PETER S. SMITH
Trial Attorney
Department of Transportation
Washington, D.C. 20590
SNIPPETS:
|
|
2
.
REPLY BRIEF
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
ADARAND UNITED STATES DBE PROGRAM REGULATIONS ADARAND CONSTRUCTORS COLORADO TRANSPORTATION CERTIFICATE FEDERAL APPELLANTS APPEALS TEA-21 SLATER SUPP SUPREME COURT PEņA ISTEA FEDERAL-AID HIGHWAY FUNDS DISADVANTAGE CONSTITUTIONALITY GOVERNMENT PRESUMPTIONS RECIPIENTS SCC PROGRAM CIRCUIT RODNEY HONORABLE JUDGE JOHN PAUL GEIER COMPLIANCE |
No. 97-1304
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT
ADARAND CONSTRUCTORS, INC.,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
RODNEY E. SLATER, Secretary of Transportation, et al.,
Defendants-Appellants
ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Honorable Judge John L. Kane, Jr.
THE FEDERAL APPELLANTS' REPLY TO APPELLEE'S SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF
NANCY E. McFADDEN BILL LANN LEE
General Counsel Acting Assistant Attorney General
PAUL M. GEIER
Assistant General Counsel MARK L. GROSS
for Litigation LOUIS E. PERAERTZ
Attorneys
EDWARD V. A. KUSSY Department of Justice
Deputy Chief Counsel P.O. Box 66078
Federal Highway Washington, D.C. 20035-6078
Administration (202) 616-2013
PETER S. SMITH
Trial Attorney
Department of Transportation
Washington, D.C. 20590
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SNIPPETS:
|
|
3
.
OPPOSIITON TO PETITION FOR CERTIORARI
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
DISADVANTAGE PETITIONER APPEALS CONGRESS DISCRIMINATION ADARAND CONSTRUCTORS DBE PROGRAM GOVERNMENT STRICT SCRUTINY TRANSPORTATION DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE PET HIGHWAY REGULATIONS RACIAL DISCRIMINATION UNITED STATES CONTRACTING DOT PRESUMPTION LEGISLATION DBE CERTIFICATION RECIPIENTS CERTIORARI PARTICIPATION ECONOMIC DISADVANTAGE ADMINISTRATION CONSTITUTIONALITY JURISDICTION TEA-21 |
No. 00-730
In the Supreme Court of the United States
ADARAND CONSTRUCTORS, INC., PETITIONER
v.
RODNEY E. SLATER,
SECRETARY OF TRANSPORTATION, ET AL.
ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI
TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT
BRIEF FOR THE RESPONDENTS IN OPPOSITION
SETH P. WAXMAN
Solicitor General
Counsel of Record
BILL LANN LEE
Assistant Attorney General
R B
OSALIND A. KNAPP ARBARA D. UNDERWOOD
Acting General Counsel Deputy Solicitor General
P M
AUL M. GEIER ARK L. GROSS
Assistant General Counsel TERESA KWONG
for Litigation Attorneys
P Department of Justice
ETER J. PLOCKI
Senior Trial Attorney Washington, D.C. 20530-0001
(202) 5142217
EDWARD V. A. KUSSY
Acting Chief Counsel
Federal Highway
Administration
Department of
Transportation
Washington, D.C. 20590
QUESTIONS PRESENTED
1. Whether the court of appeals misapplied the strict
scrutiny standard in determining if Congress had a com-
pelling interest to enact legislation designed to remedy the
effects of racial discrimination.
2. Whether the United States Department of Trans-
SNIPPETS:
|
|
4
.
BRIEF OF RESPONDENT
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
DBE DISCRIMINATION PETITIONER CONGRESS REGULATIONS BUSINESS PROVISIONS APPEALS CONSTRUCTION DISADVANTAGE ADARAND GOVERNMENT TEA-21 RACIAL DISCRIMINATION CONSTITUTION TRANSPORTATION JURISDICTION ENTERPRISE LACKS STANDING REGULATORY PROVISIONS DOT UNITED STATES BUSINESSES SUBCONTRACTING HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION STRICT SCRUTINY DIRECT FEDERAL PROCUREMENT SBA CONTRACTING |
No. 00-730
In the Supreme Court of the United States
ADARAND CONSTRUCTORS, INC., PETITIONER
v.
NORMAN Y. MINETA, SECRETARY OF
TRANSPORTATION, ET AL.
ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI
TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT
BRIEF FOR THE RESPONDENTS
THEODORE B. OLSON
Solicitor General
Counsel of Record
ROSALIND A. KNAPP RALPH F. BOYD, JR.
Acting General Counsel Assistant Attorney General
PAUL M. GEIER PAUL D. CLEMENT
Assistant General Counsel Deputy Solicitor General
for Litigation JEFFREY A. LAMKEN
PETER J. PLOCKI Assistant to the Solicitor
Senior Trial Attorney General
PETER S. SMITH MARK L. GROSS
Trial Attorney TERESA KWONG
EDWARD V.A. KUSSY Attorneys
Acting Chief Counsel Department of Justice
Federal Highway Washington, D.C. 20530-0001
Administration (202) 5142217
Department of Transportation
Washington, D.C. 20590
QUESTIONS PRESENTED
1. Whether the court of appeals misapplied the strict
scrutiny standard in determining whether Congress had a
compelling interest to enact legislation designed to remedy
the effects of racial discrimination.
2. Whether the United States Department of Trans-
portation's current Disadvantaged Business Enterprise pro-
gram is narrowly tailored to serve a compelling govern-
mental interest.
SNIPPETS:
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|
