LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

PEARL LEATHER REFINISHERS, INC. v GLOVERSVILLE-JOHNSTOWN JOINT SEWER BD Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CourtCode: AP, CourtName: NEW YORK COURT OF APPEALS, Plaintiff: PEARL LEATHER REFINISHERS, INC., State: NEW YORK, UniqueCaseRef: NE>AP>079_0430, Sewer, Sewer Board, Respondent, Sewer Rents, Appellate, City, Discharge Permit, Industry, Authority, General Municipal Law, Revoke, Appellate Division, Penalties, Statute, County, Town Taxes, Revocation, Judge, Pearl Leather, Gloversville-johnstown Joint Sewer, Opinion, Johnstown, Industrial Wastewater, Local Legislative Body, Arrears, Accordance, Locality, Recover, Unpaid Sewer Rents , ContentID: 120249032

Case Documents
1 1992-05-07 OPINION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 120942
2 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 2 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . OPINION

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
SEWER BOARD
RESPONDENT
SEWER RENTS
APPELLATE
CITY
LAW
DISCHARGE PERMIT
INDUSTRY
AUTHORITY
GENERAL MUNICIPAL LAW
REVOKE
APPELLATE DIVISION
PENALTIES
STATUTE
COUNTY
TOWN TAXES
REVOCATION
JUDGE
PEARL LEATHER
GLOVERSVILLE-JOHNSTOWN JOINT SEWER
OPINION
JOHNSTOWN
INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER
LOCAL LEGISLATIVE BODY
ARREARS
ACCORDANCE
LOCALITY
RECOVER
UNPAID SEWER RENTS


  IN THE MATTER OF PEARL LEATHER REFINISHERS, INC., RESPONDENT, v.
  GLOVERSVILLE-JOHNSTOWN JOINT SEWER BOARD, APPELLANT.

    79 N.Y.2d 430, 593 N.E.2d 263, 583 N.Y.S.2d 809 (1992).
    May 7, 1992

   3 No. 78
   Decided May 7, 1992
     _________________________________________________________________

   This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication
   in the New York Reports.

   Deborah H. Karalunas, for Appellant.
   Preclusion, for Respondent.

   PER CURIAM:

   Respondent Pearl Leather Finishers is a leather finishing and painting
   business located in the City of Johnstown. Pursuant to General
   Municipal Law § 452, the City of Johnstown has enacted a sewer use
   law, which is contained at article 17 of the Johnstown City Code.
   Johnstown's sewer use law requires that each significant industrial
   user and each major contributing industry obtain an industrial
   wastewater discharge permit from the appellant Gloversville-Johnstown
   Joint Sewer Board. Effective November 25, 1985, the respondent, a
   major contributing industry as defined at § 17-201 (23) of the City
   Code, was granted a permit to discharge industrial wastewater into the
   public sewers served by the Gloversville-Johnstown Jointly Owned
   Wastewater Treatment Facility.

   Respondent disputed the sewer rents assessed by the appellant Sewer
   Board and did not pay its sewer use bills for the period between
   August 1986 until November 1987. Respondent was served with a notice
   of violation and after a hearing, the Sewer Board determined that
   respondent owed $8,388.05 in sewer rents. The Sewer Board ordered
   payment within 14 days or else respondent's discharge permit would be
   revoked. Respondent commenced this article 78 proceeding challenging
   the Sewer Board's determination.

   The Appellate Division, based on its review of the record, concluded
   that there was a rational basis for the Sewer Board's calculation of
   sewer rents due from respondent. The court agreed with respondent,
   however, that the Sewer Board lacked the authority to revoke its
   discharge permit. The Sewer Board appealed from that portion of the
   Appellate Division's decision, and we granted leave to appeal to
SNIPPETS:
  • Preclusion, for Respondent.
  • Respondent Pearl Leather Finishers is a leather finishing and painting business located in
  • Pursuant to General Municipal Law § 452, the City of Johnstown has enacted a sewer use law,
  • Johnstown's sewer use law requires that each significant industrial user and each major
  • Respondent disputed the sewer rents assessed by the appellant Sewer Board and did not pay its
  • The Appellate Division, based on its review of the record, concluded that there was a
  • The Sewer Board appealed from that portion of the Appellate Division's decision, and we
  • While General City Law § 20 authorizes cities to establish and impose sewer rents, this must
  • Section 452 lists several ways in which a locality can recover unpaid sewer rents.
  • The local legislative body may maintain an action "as upon contract for sewer rents in
  • Alternatively, the local legislative body may draw up an annual statement showing the may be provided by law for the collection and enforcement of city, county or town taxes."
  • This statute speaks directly to the problem of recovering past due sewer rents and gives
  • In our opinion, given the explicit nature of these remedies, the power of revocation must be
  • the Appellate Division was correct in holding that the Sewer Board's authority was derived
  • Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Kaye, Titone, Hancock and Bellacosa concur.
  •    |