LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

PEOPLE v SANTIAGO Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CourtCode: AP, CourtName: NEW YORK COURT OF APPEALS, Plaintiff: PEOPLE, State: NEW YORK, UniqueCaseRef: NE>AP>080_0917, Appellant, Respondent, Review, Judge, Angel Santiago, Ssm, Memorandum, Publication, York Reports, Stanley, Kaplan, Amy Donner, Submissions Pursuant, Facts, Contention, Sentencing, Time Sufficient, Chief Judge Wachtler, Judges Simons, Kaye, Titone, Hancock, Bellacosa Concur , ContentID: 120249015

Case Documents
1 1992-09-17 OPINION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 120925
1 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 1 page.    CAUTION.    PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS IS A ONE PAGE CASE.
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . OPINION

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
RESPONDENT
REVIEW
JUDGE
ANGEL SANTIAGO
SSM
MEMORANDUM
PUBLICATION
YORK REPORTS
STANLEY
KAPLAN
AMY DONNER
SUBMISSIONS PURSUANT
FACTS
CONTENTION
SENTENCING
TIME SUFFICIENT
CHIEF JUDGE WACHTLER
JUDGES SIMONS
KAYE
TITONE
HANCOCK
BELLACOSA CONCUR


  THE PEOPLE &C., APPELLANT, v. ANGEL SANTIAGO, RESPONDENT.

    80 N.Y.2d 917, 602 N.E.2d 1118, 589 N.Y.S.2d 302 (1992).
    September 17, 1992

   1 No. 295 SSM 44
   Decided September 17, 1992
     _________________________________________________________________

   This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before
   publication in the New York Reports.

   Submitted by Stanley R. Kaplan, for Appellant.
   Submitted by Amy Donner, for Respondent.

   * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

   On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules, order
   affirmed. Under the facts and circumstances of this case, the People's
   contention with respect to sentencing was not advanced at a time
   sufficient to preserve the issue for this Court's review. Chief Judge
   Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Titone, Hancock and Bellacosa
   concur.
SNIPPETS:
  • THE PEOPLE &C., APPELLANT, v. ANGEL SANTIAGO, RESPONDENT.
  • No. 295 SSM 44 Decided September 17,
  • This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York
  • Submitted by Stanley R. Kaplan,
  • Submitted by Amy Donner, for Respondent.
  • On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules,
  • Under the facts and circumstances of this case, the People's contention with respect to
  • Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Titone, Hancock and Bellacosa concur.
  •    |