LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

PEOPLE v MATTHEWS Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CourtCode: AP, CourtName: NEW YORK COURT OF APPEALS, Plaintiff: PEOPLE, State: NEW YORK, UniqueCaseRef: NE>AP>079_1010, Judges, Respondent, Appellant, Contentions, Ronnie Matthews, Memorandum, Publication, York Reports, Perry, Reich, Paula Milazzo, Review, Principal Contentions, Motion, Severance, Charge, Adequately Caution, Jury, Evidence Pertaining, Basis, Chief Judge Wachtler, Judges Kaye, Hancock, Bellacosa, Yesawich Concur, Judges Simons, Titone , ContentID: 120248988

Case Documents
1 1992-05-05 OPINION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 120898
1 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 1 page.    CAUTION.    PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS IS A ONE PAGE CASE.
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . OPINION

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
RESPONDENT
APPELLANT
CONTENTIONS
RONNIE MATTHEWS
MEMORANDUM
PUBLICATION
YORK REPORTS
PERRY
REICH
PAULA MILAZZO
REVIEW
PRINCIPAL CONTENTIONS
MOTION
SEVERANCE
CHARGE
ADEQUATELY CAUTION
JURY
EVIDENCE PERTAINING
BASIS
CHIEF JUDGE WACHTLER
JUDGES KAYE
HANCOCK
BELLACOSA
YESAWICH CONCUR
JUDGES SIMONS
TITONE


  THE PEOPLE &C., RESPONDENT, v. RONNIE MATTHEWS, APPELLANT.

    79 N.Y.2d 1010, 594 N.E.2d 930, 584 N.Y.S.2d 436 (1992).
    May 5, 1992

   1 No. 70
   Decided May 5, 1992
     _________________________________________________________________

   This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before
   publication in the New York Reports.

   Perry S. Reich, for Appellant.
   Paula Milazzo, for Respondent.

   * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

   Order affirmed. Defendant failed to preserve for review his principal
   contentions that the motion for a severance was improperly denied and
   that the trial court's charge did not adequately caution the jury to
   consider the evidence pertaining to each count of the indictment
   separately. Defendant's other contentions present no basis for
   reversal. Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Kaye, Hancock, Bellacosa and
   Yesawich concur. Judges Simons and Titone took no part.
SNIPPETS:
  • THE PEOPLE &C., RESPONDENT, v. RONNIE MATTHEWS, APPELLANT.
  • This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York
  • Perry S. Reich, for Appellant.
  • Paula Milazzo, for Respondent.
  • Defendant failed to preserve for review his principal contentions that the motion for a
  • Defendant's other contentions present no basis for reversal.
  • Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Kaye, Hancock, Bellacosa and Yesawich concur.
  • Judges Simons and Titone took no part.
  •    |