LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

PEOPLE v JACKSON Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CourtCode: AP, CourtName: NEW YORK COURT OF APPEALS, Plaintiff: PEOPLE, State: NEW YORK, UniqueCaseRef: NE>AP>079_0907, Bag, Officer, Car, Police, Sergeant Rivera, Appellant, Vehicle, Contrast, Memorandum, Report, Officer Sherlock, Morningside Avenue, Ny2d, Suspect, Judge, Respondent, York, Appellate Division, Receiving, Holding, Seat, Driver, Sitting, Plastic Bag, Flashlight, Arrest, Weapon, Contends, Inasmuch , ContentID: 120248974

Case Documents
1 1992-02-25 OPINION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 120884
2 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 2 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . OPINION

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
BAG
OFFICER
CAR
POLICE
SERGEANT RIVERA
APPELLANT
VEHICLE
CONTRAST
MEMORANDUM
REPORT
OFFICER SHERLOCK
MORNINGSIDE AVENUE
NY2D
SUSPECT
JUDGE
RESPONDENT
YORK
APPELLATE DIVISION
RECEIVING
HOLDING
SEAT
DRIVER
SITTING
PLASTIC BAG
FLASHLIGHT
ARREST
WEAPON
CONTENDS
INASMUCH


  THE PEOPLE &C., RESPONDENT, v. MANUEL JACKSON, APPELLANT.

    79 N.Y.2d 907, 590 N.E.2d 240, 581 N.Y.S.2d 655 (1992).
    February 25, 1992

   1 No. 126 SSM 73
   Decided February 25, 1992
     _________________________________________________________________

   This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before
   publication in the New York Reports.

   Submitted by Ira Mickenberg, for Appellant.
   Submitted by Myles L. Orosco, for Respondent.

   MEMORANDUM.:

   The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

   In August 1989, Police Officer Kevin Sherlock, while on routine motor
   patrol in Manhattan, received a report of an abduction in progress at
   125th Street and Morningside Avenue. The report specified that two men
   in a grey four-door Volvo had kidnapped a third man and were holding
   him in the back seat of the car. Moments after receiving the
   transmission, Officer Sherlock spotted a vehicle which matched the
   description given in the radio run heading south on Morningside Avenue
   at 117th Street. He then followed the vehicle and ordered its driver
   to pull over near 116th Street and Seventh Avenue. Several other
   officers, including Sergeant Robert Rivera, subsequently arrived at
   the scene. While Officer Sherlock approached the driver and asked him
   for his license and registration, Sergeant Rivera proceeded to the
   passenger side of the automobile, where defendant was sitting. Upon
   observing a plastic bag at defendant's feet, the sergeant reached
   through the window of the car, picked up the bag, and, without opening
   it, shined his flashlight through it. Detecting what he believed to be
   marijuana, Sergeant Rivera ordered defendant out of the car. Defendant
   complied, and was subsequently placed under arrest. The ensuing search
   of defendant's person disclosed the presence of a loaded .38 caliber
   revolver in defendant's waistband. Defendant was thereafter indicted
   for criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree. Prior to
   trial, defendant moved to suppress the physical evidence that had been
   seized at the time of his arrest. After conducting a Mapp hearing,
   Supreme Court, New York County, denied defendant's motion; and
   defendant subsequently pled guilty. On appeal, the Appellate Division
   affirmed.

SNIPPETS:
  • THE PEOPLE &C., RESPONDENT, v. MANUEL JACKSON, APPELLANT.
  • This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York
  • The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
  • In August 1989, Police Officer Kevin Sherlock, while on routine motor patrol in Manhattan,
  • The report specified that two men in a grey four-door Volvo had kidnapped a third man and
  • Moments after receiving the transmission, Officer Sherlock spotted a vehicle which matched
  • While Officer Sherlock approached the driver and asked him for his license and registration,
  • Upon observing a plastic bag at defendant's feet, the sergeant reached through the window of
  • Defendant was thereafter indicted for criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree.
  • defendant moved to suppress the physical evidence that had been seized at the time of his
  • After conducting a Mapp hearing, Supreme Court, New York County, denied defendant's motion;
  • Defendant does not dispute that the police had a legitimate basis to stop the vehicle in
  • our holding in People v Torres (74 NY2d 224) does not dictate a contrary result.
  • the police proceeded to search a bag located on the front seat of a car that they had just
  • We concluded that, inasmuch as the police had already isolated the suspect from the bag, the
  • Here, by contrast, the rather cursory examination of the bag occurred while defendant was
  • Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock and Bellacosa concur.
  •    |