LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

PEOPLE v FLYNN Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CourtCode: AP, CourtName: NEW YORK COURT OF APPEALS, Plaintiff: PEOPLE, State: NEW YORK, UniqueCaseRef: NE>AP>079_0879, Vehicle, Accident, Report, Traffic Law, Ny2d, Damage, Jury, Scene, Complainant, Police, Motor Vehicle, Charge, Rosario, Appellant, Memorandum, Indictment, Leaving, Door, Insurance Identification, Sustaining, Instruct, Accordance, License, Insurance Identification Card, Operating, Nearest Police Station, Judicial Officer, Committed Reversible Error , ContentID: 120248964

Case Documents
1 1992-02-18 OPINION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 120874
3 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 3 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . OPINION

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
VEHICLE
ACCIDENT
REPORT
TRAFFIC LAW
NY2D
DAMAGE
JURY
SCENE
COMPLAINANT
COURT
POLICE
MOTOR VEHICLE
CHARGE
ROSARIO
APPELLANT
MEMORANDUM
INDICTMENT
LEAVING
DOOR
INSURANCE IDENTIFICATION
SUSTAINING
INSTRUCT
ACCORDANCE
LICENSE
INSURANCE IDENTIFICATION CARD
OPERATING
NEAREST POLICE STATION
JUDICIAL OFFICER
COMMITTED REVERSIBLE ERROR


  THE PEOPLE &C., RESPONDENT, v. ERROL FLYNN, APPELLANT.

    79 N.Y.2d 879, 589 N.E.2d 383, 581 N.Y.S.2d 160 (1992).
    February 18, 1992

   2 No. 17
   Decided February 18, 1992
     _________________________________________________________________

   This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before
   publication in the New York Reports.

   Kenneth Finkelman, for Appellant.
   Aprilanne Agostino, for Respondent.

   MEMORANDUM:

   The order of the Appellate Division should be modified by dismissing
   the indictment as to count 4, leaving the scene of an accident, and,
   as so modified affirmed.

   Defendant has been convicted of leaving the scene of an accident
   without reporting (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 600(1)(a)) and other
   crimes. At trial, complainant testified that defendant struck the door
   of complainant's parked vehicle, assaulted him, and then left the
   scene of the accident without providing a license or insurance
   identification card. Defendant testified that the accident occurred
   when the complainant suddenly opened the door so that it extended into
   his lane of travel. He claims that he stopped after striking the door
   but that a fight developed over who caused the accident and that
   complainant ran away before defendant had a chance to provide the
   information. Defendant testified that he then drove to his home, two
   blocks away, intending to report the accident to the police, but that
   he was arrested before he was able to do so.

   Vehicle and Traffic Law § 600(1)(a) provides, in part, that any person
   operating a motor vehicle who knowingly causes damage to the personal
   property of another, "shall, before leaving the place where the
   accident occurred, stop, exhibit his license and insurance
   identification card for such vehicle,... and give his name,
   residence...insurance carrier and insurance identification
   information...to the party sustaining the damage." The section further
   provides that where "the person sustaining the damage is not present
   at the place where the damage occurred," then the operator "shall
   report the same as soon as physically able to the nearest police
   station, or judicial officer" (Vehicle & Traffic Law § 600(1)(a)).
SNIPPETS:
  • THE PEOPLE &C., RESPONDENT, v. ERROL FLYNN, APPELLANT.
  • This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York
  • The order of the Appellate Division should be modified by dismissing the indictment as to
  • Defendant has been convicted of leaving the scene of an accident without reporting (Vehicle
  • At trial, complainant testified that defendant struck the door of complainant's parked
  • Defendant testified that he then drove to his home, two blocks away, intending to report the
  • Vehicle and Traffic Law § 600provides, in part, that any person operating a motor vehicle who
  • The section further provides that where "the person sustaining the damage is not present at
  • Defendant claims that the trial court committed reversible error when it failed to instruct
  • It is well settled that all the elements of an indicted crime which are not conceded by
  • Here, immediately after apprising the jury of Vehicle & Traffic Law § 600, the court
  • The People contend that the trial court properly declined to charge the disputed element of
  • Prior to trial, defendant requested from the People a copy of a motor vehicle accident report
  • Order modified in accordance with the memorandum herein and, as so modified, affirmed.
  •    |