 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1
.
OPINION
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
PENALTY APPELLATE APPELLATE DIVISION DETERMINATION COURT MEAGHER NY2D FACTS LAW SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE POLICE PELL SUPRA REVIEW CERTIFICATES COMMISSIONER JUDGE DISPROPORTIONATE VACATION PROCEEDING AGENCY FORFEITURE RYAN OFFICER FIREARMS SECURITY GUARDS CPLR ARTICLE YORK PUBLICATION |
1 No. 43
In the Matter of Timothy Kelly,
Respondent,
v.
Howard Safir, &c., et al.,
Appellants.
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
1 No. 44
In the Matter of Justin Meagher,
Respondent,
v.
Howard Safir, &c., et al.,
Appellants.
_________________________________________________________________
Case No. 43:
_________________________________________________________________
2001 NY Int. 26
March 22, 2001
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication
in the New York Reports.
Kathleen Alberton, for appellants.
Norman A. Olch, for respondent. Case No. 44: Dona B. Morris, for
appellants.
Howard B. Sterinbach, for respondent.
_________________________________________________________________
WESLEY
, J.:
These CPLR article 78 proceedings present the Court with the same
issue: whether the Appellate Division erred in its application of the
principles governing judicial review of administrative penalties as
enunciated by this Court in Matter of Pell v Board of Educ. (34 2
222). We conclude that it did. Matter of Kelly
Petitioner Timothy Kelly was dismissed from his job as a police
sergeant with the New York City Police Department after 29 years of
service. The specifications charged Kelly with violations of the
Patrol Guide and the Penal Law (see, Penal Law §§ 175.40; 210.45).
SNIPPETS:
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|
