LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

IN THE MATTER OF ANTHONY BOTTOM v GLENN S. GOORD, AS COMMISSIONER OF THE NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CourtCode: AP, CourtName: NEW YORK COURT OF APPEALS, Plaintiff: IN THE MATTER OF ANTHONY BOTTOM, State: NEW YORK, UniqueCaseRef: NE>AP>I01_0053, Petitioner, Jail Time, Commissioner, Correction, City, York, Jail Time Credit, City Department, Respondents, Appellant, California, Custody, Recalculation, Cplr, Proceeding, Judge, Matter, Memorandum, Appellate Division, Pursuant, Commencement, Parole, Prior, Calculation, Requesting, Spent, Cplr Article, Relief, Penal Law , ContentID: 120248727

Case Documents
1 2001-05-08 OPINION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 120637
2 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 2 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . OPINION

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
JAIL TIME
COMMISSIONER
CORRECTION
CITY
YORK
JAIL TIME CREDIT
CITY DEPARTMENT
RESPONDENTS
APPELLANT
CALIFORNIA
CUSTODY
RECALCULATION
CPLR
LAW
PROCEEDING
JUDGE
MATTER
MEMORANDUM
APPELLATE DIVISION
PURSUANT
COMMENCEMENT
PAROLE
PRIOR
CALCULATION
REQUESTING
SPENT
CPLR ARTICLE
RELIEF
PENAL LAW


   3 No. 66
   In the Matter of Anthony Bottom,
   Appellant,
   v.
   Glenn S. Goord, as Commissioner of the New York State Department of
   Correctional Services, et al.,
   Respondents.
     _________________________________________________________________

   2001 NY Int. 53

   May 8, 2001

   This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before
   publication in the New York Reports.

   Betsy C. Sterling, for appellant.
   Lew A. Millenbach, for respondents.
   Legal Aid Society, Criminal Defense Division, amicus curić.
     _________________________________________________________________
     _________________________________________________________________

   MEMORANDUM:

   The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs,
   and respondents' motion to dismiss denied.

   On February 25, 1972, following his conviction of crimes committed in
   the State of California, petitioner was sentenced to serve a term of
   one year to life in prison. On or about December 5, 1972, petitioner
   was extradited to New York, where he was convicted of murder and
   sentenced to 25 years to life. Petitioner remained in the custody of
   the New York City Department of Correction until May 19, 1975 when he
   was returned to California to complete his sentence there.

   Petitioner was paroled from his California sentence on September 19,
   1977 and transferred to the custody of the New York City Department of
   Correction. He remained in its custody for 58 days prior to his
   transfer to the State Department of Correctional Services. At that
   time, the City Department of Correction calculated 58 days of jail
   time credit.

   By letter to the City Commissioner of Correction dated December 1,
   1998, petitioner requested a recalculation of his jail time credit to
   account for the period of two and one-half years between 1972 and 1975
   that he had spent in New York awaiting trial. The Commissioner did not
SNIPPETS:
  • This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York
  • Betsy C. Sterling, for appellant.
  • Lew A. Millenbach, for respondents.
  • The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and respondents' motion
  • On February 25, 1972, following his conviction of crimes committed in the State of
  • Petitioner remained in the custody of the New York City Department of Correction until May
  • He remained in its custody for 58 days prior to his transfer to the State Department of
  • By letter to the City Commissioner of Correction dated December 1, 1998, petitioner requested
  • On February 22, 1999, by verified petition pursuant to CPLR article 78 against the City and
  • Correction Law § 600-a requires the City Commissioner to keep a record of the jail time to
  • The calculation of jail time credit, pursuant to Correction Law § 600-a and Penal Law §
  • of Parole,, 10 NY2d 116, 121-122).
  • Where a person seeks to compel the performance of a purely ministerial act, such relief may
  • Under those circumstances, the proceeding must be commenced within four months "after the
  • Here, petitioner timely commenced this proceeding in February 1999 after he received no
  • Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Smith, Levine, Ciparick, Wesley and Rosenblatt concur.
  •    |