LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

REGINA L. DARBY, AS THE ADMINISTRATRIX C.T.A. &C. OF PETER SHELLEY ZEILER, and REGINA L. DARBY, IND Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CourtCode: AP, CourtName: NEW YORK COURT OF APPEALS, State: NEW YORK, UniqueCaseRef: NE>AP>I01_0067, Hotel, Beach, Duty, Guests, Innkeeper, York, Dangers, Rip Tide, Water, Control, Publication, Surf Conditions, Ny2d, Failure, Darby, Zeiler, Brazilian Government, Responsibility, Facilitates, Warnings, Negligence, Land, Certification, Butts, App, Copacabana Beach, District Court , ContentID: 120248713

Case Documents
1 2001-06-07 OPINION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 120623
5 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 5 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . OPINION

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
BEACH
DUTY
GUESTS
INNKEEPER
COURT
YORK
DANGERS
RIP TIDE
WATER
CONTROL
PUBLICATION
SURF CONDITIONS
NY2D
FAILURE
DARBY
ZEILER
BRAZILIAN GOVERNMENT
DEFENDANT
RESPONSIBILITY
FACILITATES
LAW
WARNINGS
NEGLIGENCE
LAND
CERTIFICATION
BUTTS
APP
COPACABANA BEACH
DISTRICT COURT


   USCOA,2 No. 87
   Regina L. Darby, as the Administratrix C.T.A. &c. of Peter Shelley
   Zeiler, and Regina L. Darby, individually,
   Appellants,
   v.
   Compagnie National Air France, &c., et al.,
   Defendants, Societe Des Hotels Meridien, d/b/a Meridien Hotels, Inc.,
   Respondent.
     _________________________________________________________________

   2001 NY Int. 67

   June 7, 2001

   This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication
   in the New York Reports.

   Edward T. Chase, for appellants.
   Deborah Del Sordo, for respondent.
     _________________________________________________________________

   ROSENBLATT, J.:

   Peter Zeiler drowned while swimming at Copacabana Beach, a public
   facility in Rio De Janeiro, Brazil. He and Regina Darby were guests at
   the Meridien Copacabana Hotel, which is separated from the beach by a
   four-lane public highway. The hotel marketed its proximity to the
   beach and encouraged guests to use it, even providing them with
   chairs, umbrellas, towels and a security escort service. It also
   furnished guests with pamphlets warning about sun exposure and crime
   on the beach. The pamphlets did not, however, say anything about
   possibly dangerous surf conditions.

   The Brazilian government owned and maintained the beach and employed
   the lifeguards and rescue personnel. The government did not convey
   surf information to area hotels. When local weather conditions created
   rip tides,(1) lifeguards were not permitted to enter the water but
   would post red flags and, when necessary, call for helicopters to
   rescue swimmers.

   On the day in question, Zeiler went swimming at the beach. When he
   failed to return, Darby summoned help and eventually learned that he
   had drowned. Individually and on behalf of Zeiler's estate, Darby sued
   Societe des Hotels Meridien in United States District Court for the
   Southern District of New York, alleging that Zeiler drowned in a rip
   tide and that the hotel was negligent in failing to warn him of the
SNIPPETS:
  • USCOA,2 No. 87 Regina L. Darby, as the Administratrix C.T.A. &c. of Peter Shelley Zeiler, and
  • This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York
  • Peter Zeiler drowned while swimming at Copacabana Beach, a public facility in Rio De Janeiro,
  • He and Regina Darby were guests at the Meridien Copacabana Hotel, which is separated from the
  • The hotel marketed its proximity to the beach and encouraged guests to use it, even providing
  • The Brazilian government owned and maintained the beach and employed the lifeguards and
  • When local weather conditions created rip tides,lifeguards were not permitted to enter the
  • Individually and on behalf of Zeiler's estate, Darby sued Societe des Hotels Meridien in
  • The District Court held that the "hotel had no duty to warn its guests about the conditions
  • "Whether, under New York law and all of the circumstances shown by the record developed in
  • "Whether an innkeeper who so encourages and facilitates use of a nearby public beach has 'a
  • warn them of its dangerous condition'" (quoting Butts v Kouwenhoven, 272 App Div 1019,
  • A finding of negligence may be based only upon the breach of a duty.
  • Although juries determine whether and to what extent a particular duty was breached, it is
  • In assessing the scope and consequences of civil responsibility, they define the boundaries
  • In New York, negligence causes of action have been sustained against innkeepers in a variety 4; Maloney v Hearst Hotels Corp., 274 NY 106, 109 ).
  • Plaintiff asks us to impose on innkeepers a duty to warn of dangerous surf conditions at
  • As the Restatement puts it, an innkeeper owes no "duty to a guest who is injured or ncess Hotels International, Inc. v Superior Court, 33 Cal App4th 645, 651-652, 39 Cal Rptr2d 457,
  • Plaintiff relies primarily on Butts v Kouwenhoven
  • While it may well have been good practice, it would be inapt to require such a warning merely
  • Having answered the first question in the negative, we further conclude that a hotel or
  • Following certification of questions by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second
  •    |