2 No. 98
Jo-Ann Cantalino,
Appellant,
v.
Jacqueline Danner,
Respondent.
_________________________________________________________________
2001 NY Int. 86
June 28, 2001
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication
in the New York Reports.
Anthony J. Genovesi, Jr., for appellant.
John W. Burns, for respondent.
City of New York, amicus curiæ.
_________________________________________________________________
KAYE, CHIEF JUDGE:
Is a dismissal in the interest of justice a "favorable termination"
for purposes of a malicious prosecution action? Under the
circumstances here, we conclude that it is, since the court's reasons
for dismissing the criminal charges were not inconsistent with the
innocence of the accused.
This case arises out of the bitterly contested divorce of plaintiff
from her husband. The husband, a Lieutenant in the New York City
Police Department, was living with defendant -- his girlfriend, who
was also a police officer. While the divorce action was pending in
Kings County Supreme Court, the husband purported to obtain a divorce
in the Dominican Republic and marry defendant. He then repeatedly
failed to comply with orders entered in the Kings County divorce
proceeding.
Plaintiff moved to have her husband held in contempt, and Supreme
Court ordered that he be personally served. One service attempt was
unsuccessful when defendant allegedly grabbed the papers from the
process server. On another occasion, the officers at the husband's
precinct apparently thwarted a service attempt by informing the
process server that he was not at work and sending the process server
to a false location. On yet a third occasion, the Police Department
allegedly refused to provide a police escort so that plaintiff could
serve her husband at his home in Staten Island.
SNIPPETS:
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York
Under the circumstances here, we conclude that it is, since the court's reasons for
The husband, a Lieutenant in the New York City Police Department, was living with defendant
While the divorce action was pending in Kings County Supreme Court, the husband purported to
He then repeatedly failed to comply with orders entered in the Kings County divorce
Plaintiff moved to have her husband held in contempt, and Supreme Court ordered that he be
the officers at the husband's precinct apparently thwarted a service attempt by informing the
Supreme Court ordered that service be made on the husband by "nailing to the door" of his
Pursuant to that order, plaintiff, accompanied by her process server, Rosalie Perez, went to
By a Criminal Court complaint, plaintiff was charged with assault in the third degree,
In a lengthy opinion, Criminal Court dismissed the complaint in the interest of justice,
Specifically, the court held that because plaintiff was complying with Supreme Court's order
In addition, the court noted that dismissing the complaint "would have a positive effect on
Plaintiff then brought the present malicious prosecution action against defendant.Defendant
The Appellate Division reversed and dismissed the complaint, holding that a dismissal in the
In Smith-Hunter, this Court held that any termination of a criminal prosecution, such that
The same rule applies if charges are dismissed out of mercy, since mercy presupposes the
|