 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1
.
OPINION
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
RESPONDENT CRIMINAL POSSESSION MEMORANDUM JUDGE DEFENDANTS GRAFFEO CONCUR ROSENBLATT WESLEY CIPARICK LEVINE JUDGES SMITH CHIEF JUDGE KAYE MERIT REVIEW SHOTGUN BARREL EVIDENCE LEGAL SUFFICIENCY NY2D SYKES INDICTMENT CHARGE MORAL CERTAINTY TRIAL COURT CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE WEAPON CRIMINAL TRESPASS CONVICTIONS APPELLATE DIVISION FIERRO |
4 No. 110
The People &c.,
Respondent,
v.
Angel Cruz,
Appellant.
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
4 No. 111
The People &c.,
Respondent,
v.
Gamiliet Rosario,
Appellant.
_________________________________________________________________
Case No. 110:
_________________________________________________________________
2001 NY Int. 84
June 28, 2001
This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before
publication in the New York Reports.
Michael J. Nolan, for appellant.
Alan Cruikshank, for respondent.
Case No. 111: Submitted by Barbara S. Greathead, for appellant.
Submitted by Patrick H. Fierro, for respondent.
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM:
The order of the Appellate Division in each case should be affirmed.
Defendants appeal their convictions of first degree criminal trespass,
third degree criminal possession of a weapon, and two counts of
seventh degree criminal possession of a controlled substance. Their
arguments that the trial court should have given a "moral certainty"
charge, that the indictment was multiplicitous (see, People v Sykes, ,
22 NY2d 159), and Cruz's challenge to the legal sufficiency of the
evidence regarding the length of the shotgun barrel are unpreserved
for our review. Defendants' remaining arguments are without merit.
SNIPPETS:
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|
