LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SSM THE PEOPLE &C. v ARTHUR BURRIS Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CourtCode: AP, CourtName: NEW YORK COURT OF APPEALS, Plaintiff: SSM THE PEOPLE &C., State: NEW YORK, UniqueCaseRef: NE>AP>I01_0094, Respondent, Appellant, Review, Judge, Ssm, Arthur Burris, Int, Memorandum, Publication, York Reports, Wallace, Germain, Margaret, Mainusch, Submissions Pursuant, Contentions, Chief Judge Kaye, Judges Smith, Levine, Ciparick, Wesley, Rosenblatt, Graffeo Concur , ContentID: 120248690

Case Documents
1 2001-07-05 OPINION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 120600
1 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 1 page.    CAUTION.    PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS IS A ONE PAGE CASE.
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . OPINION

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
APPELLANT
REVIEW
JUDGE
SSM
ARTHUR BURRIS
INT
MEMORANDUM
PUBLICATION
YORK REPORTS
WALLACE
GERMAIN
MARGARET
MAINUSCH
SUBMISSIONS PURSUANT
CONTENTIONS
CHIEF JUDGE KAYE
JUDGES SMITH
LEVINE
CIPARICK
WESLEY
ROSENBLATT
GRAFFEO CONCUR


   2 No. 120 SSM 11
   The People &c.,
   Respondent,
   v.
   Arthur Burris,
   Appellant.
     _________________________________________________________________

   2001 NY Int. 94

   July 5, 2001

   This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before
   publication in the New York Reports.

   Submitted by Wallace M. Germain, for appellant.
   Submitted by Margaret E. Mainusch, for respondent.
     _________________________________________________________________

   On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules, order
   affirmed. Defendant's contentions have not been preserved for this
   Court's review. Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Smith, Levine, Ciparick,
   Wesley, Rosenblatt and Graffeo concur.

   Decided July 5, 2001
SNIPPETS:
  • No. 120 SSM 11
  • The People &c., Respondent, v. Arthur Burris, Appellant.
  • 2001 NY Int.
  • This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York
  • Submitted by Wallace M. Germain,
  • Submitted by Margaret E. Mainusch,
  • On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules,
  • Defendant's contentions have not been preserved for this Court's review.
  • Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Smith, Levine, Ciparick, Wesley, Rosenblatt and Graffeo concur.
  •    |