LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

THE PEOPLE &C. v ROBERT VERNACE Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CourtCode: AP, CourtName: NEW YORK COURT OF APPEALS, Plaintiff: THE PEOPLE &C., State: NEW YORK, UniqueCaseRef: NE>AP>I01_0098, Prosecution, Delay, Singer, Barlin, Murder, Riccardi, Witness, Ny2d, Evidence, Singer Hearing, Bartender, Appellate, Bar, Indictment, Support, Shamrock, Determination, Queens, Reasons, Homicide, District, Crime, Prompt, Charges, Supreme Court, Supra, Photographs, Arrest, Grand Jury , ContentID: 120248682

Case Documents
1 2001-07-10 OPINION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 120592
5 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 5 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . OPINION

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
PROSECUTION
DELAY
SINGER
BARLIN
MURDER
RICCARDI
WITNESS
NY2D
EVIDENCE
SINGER HEARING
BARTENDER
APPELLATE
BAR
INDICTMENT
SUPPORT
SHAMROCK
DETERMINATION
QUEENS
REASONS
HOMICIDE
DISTRICT
CRIME
PROMPT
CHARGES
SUPREME COURT
SUPRA
PHOTOGRAPHS
ARREST
GRAND JURY


   2 No. 86
   The People &c.,
   Respondent,
   v.
   Robert Vernace,
   Appellant.
     _________________________________________________________________

   2001 NY Int. 98

   July 10, 2001

   This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before
   publication in the New York Reports.

   Paul Shechtman, for appellant.
   Alyson J. Gill, for respondent.
     _________________________________________________________________
     _________________________________________________________________

   MEMORANDUM:

   The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

   The Appellate Division's determination that the People established
   good cause for the delay in prosecuting the defendant is a mixed
   question of law and fact for which there is support in the record.
   This case involves a 1981 vicious double murder in a Queens bar, for
   which no one has yet been prosecuted. Three individuals linked to
   organized crime were thought to be suspects: defendant (aka "Pepe"),
   Frank Riccardi (aka "Frankie the Geech") and Ronald Barlin (aka
   "Ronnie the Jew"). While 20 to 25 people allegedly were in the bar at
   the time of the murders, virtually all of them denied seeing the
   crime. Shortly after the murders, the main witness either fled the
   jurisdiction or hid from the police, refusing to cooperate. Another
   witness recanted her identification of Barlin, resulting in dismissal
   of an indictment against him. Riccardi has never been located. The
   Appellate Division's inference of witness fear has ample support in
   the record, placing the good cause issue beyond this Court's further
   review.

   In this State, "we have never drawn a fine distinction between due
   process and speedy trial standards" when dealing with delays in
   prosecution (People v Singer, , 44 NY2d 241, 253). Indeed, the
   factors utilized to determine if a defendant's rights have been
   abridged are the same whether the right asserted is a speedy trial
SNIPPETS:
  • The Appellate Division's determination that the People established good cause for the delay
  • This case involves a 1981 vicious double murder in a Queens bar, for which no one has yet
  • Three individuals linked to organized crime were thought to be suspects: defendant, Frank
  • While 20 to 25 people allegedly were in the bar at the time of the murders, virtually all of
  • Shortly after the murders, the main witness either fled the jurisdiction or hid from the
  • In this State, "we have never drawn a fine distinction between due process and speedy trial
  • Indeed, the factors utilized to determine if a defendant's rights have been abridged are the
  • Those factors are not simply the extent of the delay but also the reasons for the delay, the
  • Two bar owners were shot point blank after defendant's cohort allegedly became enraged over a
  • In any event, a determination made in good faith to delay prosecution for sufficient reasons
  • The Shamrock bartender had identified all three of the assailants by their nicknames,
  • The detectives initially investigating the murder were able to ascertain that the Frankie and
  • The photographs were then shown to the girlfriend on September 30, 1981, who confirmed that
  • The Homicide Bureau of the Queens County District Attorney's Office applied in a written
  • As the foregoing discussion demonstrates, the evidence against defendant at that time was
  • It is also undisputed that, for reasons never revealed during the Singer hearing, the Queens
  • Supreme Court rejected all of those contentions.
  • Supreme Court specifically found that the bartender was not the witness whose disappearance
  •    |