![]() |
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1
.
OPINION
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
PROSECUTION DELAY SINGER BARLIN MURDER RICCARDI WITNESS NY2D EVIDENCE SINGER HEARING BARTENDER APPELLATE BAR INDICTMENT SUPPORT SHAMROCK DETERMINATION QUEENS REASONS HOMICIDE DISTRICT CRIME PROMPT CHARGES SUPREME COURT SUPRA PHOTOGRAPHS ARREST GRAND JURY |
2 No. 86
The People &c.,
Respondent,
v.
Robert Vernace,
Appellant.
_________________________________________________________________
2001 NY Int. 98
July 10, 2001
This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before
publication in the New York Reports.
Paul Shechtman, for appellant.
Alyson J. Gill, for respondent.
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM:
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
The Appellate Division's determination that the People established
good cause for the delay in prosecuting the defendant is a mixed
question of law and fact for which there is support in the record.
This case involves a 1981 vicious double murder in a Queens bar, for
which no one has yet been prosecuted. Three individuals linked to
organized crime were thought to be suspects: defendant (aka "Pepe"),
Frank Riccardi (aka "Frankie the Geech") and Ronald Barlin (aka
"Ronnie the Jew"). While 20 to 25 people allegedly were in the bar at
the time of the murders, virtually all of them denied seeing the
crime. Shortly after the murders, the main witness either fled the
jurisdiction or hid from the police, refusing to cooperate. Another
witness recanted her identification of Barlin, resulting in dismissal
of an indictment against him. Riccardi has never been located. The
Appellate Division's inference of witness fear has ample support in
the record, placing the good cause issue beyond this Court's further
review.
In this State, "we have never drawn a fine distinction between due
process and speedy trial standards" when dealing with delays in
prosecution (People v Singer, , 44 NY2d 241, 253). Indeed, the
factors utilized to determine if a defendant's rights have been
abridged are the same whether the right asserted is a speedy trial
SNIPPETS:
|
| | | |